Download PDF
Clin Colon Rectal Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1801401
Review Article

Defining and Achieving High-Quality Colon Cancer Surgery

Arden M. Morris
1   Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Cindy J. Kin
1   Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

There have been extensive efforts to improve the quality of colon cancer surgery to reduce variation in practice and improve outcomes. Providing the most appropriate care begins with following guidelines for preoperative diagnostics and staging, which should lead to risk stratification, high-quality counselling, and even prehabilitation before an operation. Intraoperatively, adherence to standardized surgical protocols can enhance delivery of high-quality care, and documenting using synoptic formats can reduce ambiguity. Participating in programs that track data and provide feedback can further allow hospitals and surgeons to identify patterns and opportunities to improve the care they deliver.

Keywords

colon cancer surgery - appropriateness - quality improvement - synoptic operative report - enhanced recovery


Publication History

Article published online:
31 December 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73 (03) 233-254
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY. et al. Comparison of 30-day outcomes after emergency general surgery procedures: potential for targeted improvement. Surgery 2010; 148 (02) 217-238
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY. et al. Comparison of hospital performance in nonemergency versus emergency colorectal operations at 142 hospitals. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210 (02) 155-165
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Hendren SK, Morris AM. Evaluating patients undergoing colorectal surgery to estimate and minimize morbidity and mortality. Surg Clin North Am 2013; 93 (01) 1-20
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Schwarze ML, Brasel KJ, Mosenthal AC. Beyond 30-day mortality: aligning surgical quality with outcomes that patients value. JAMA Surg 2014; 149 (07) 631-632
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Taylor LJ, Nabozny MJ, Steffens NM. et al. A framework to improve surgeon communication in high-stakes surgical decisions: best case/worst case. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (06) 531-538
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Molenaar CJL, Minnella EM, Coca-Martinez M. et al; PREHAB Study Group. Effect of multimodal prehabilitation on reducing postoperative complications and enhancing functional capacity following colorectal cancer surgery: the PREHAB randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2023; 158 (06) 572-581
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Simianu VV, Gaertner WB, Kuntz K. et al. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of laparoscopic versus robotic minimally invasive colectomy. Ann Surg 2020; 272 (02) 334-341
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Katz MHG, Francescatti AB, Hunt KK. Cancer Surgery Standards Program of the American College of Surgeons. Technical standards for cancer surgery: commission on cancer standards 5.3-5.8. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29 (11) 6549-6558
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Thomas KK, Francescatti AB, Vreeland TJ. et al. Standardization of colon resection for cancer: an overview of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Standard 5.6. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31 (01) 6-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Nelson H. American College of Surgeons, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Operative Standards for Cancer Surgery. Vol 1. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 American College of Surgeons. Operative Standards Toolkit. 2024. Accessed July 7, 2024 at: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/cssp/resources/operative-standards-toolkit
    PubMed
  • 13 Hieken TJ, Burns WR, Francescatti AB, Morris AM, Wong SL. Cancer Surgery Standards Program of the American College of Surgeons. Technical standards for cancer surgery: improving patient care through synoptic operative reporting. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29 (11) 6526-6533
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Maniar RL, Hochman DJ, Wirtzfeld DA. et al. Documentation of quality of care data for colon cancer surgery: comparison of synoptic and dictated operative reports. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21 (11) 3592-3597
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Ban KA, Berian JR, Ko CY. Does implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in colorectal surgery improve patient outcomes?. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019; 32 (02) 109-113
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Eisenstein S, Stringfield S, Holubar SD. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) to perform clinical research in colon and rectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019; 32 (01) 41-53
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar