Am J Perinatol 2005; 22(1): 35-39
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-837268
Copyright © 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Prediction of Spontaneous Onset of Labor at Term: The Role of Cervical Length Measurement and Funneling of Internal Cervical Os Detected by Transvaginal Ultrasonography

Özlem Bayramoglu1 , Murat Arslan2 , F. Gurkan Yazici2 , Ahmet Erdem1 , Mehmet Erdem1 , Koray Bayramoglu1 , Handan Camdeviren3
  • 1Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
  • 2Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mersin, Mersin, Turkey
  • 3Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, University of Mersin, Mersin, Turkey
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 January 2005 (online)

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to examine the values of the cervical length measurement and detection of internal cervical os funneling by transvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of spontaneous labor within a 7-day period at term. Ninety-three pregnant women were enrolled into this study. All patients were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography first at the 37th completed week of gestation and weekly thereafter. Endocervical canal length was measured and the presence of funneling was recorded. The end points were the percentage of patients with a spontaneous onset of labor in the week after these data were recorded. The optimal cutoff values for predicting the onset of spontaneous labor within 7 days were 29.5 mm for cervical length at 37 weeks, 27.5 mm at 38 weeks, 25.5 mm at 39 weeks, and 24.5 mm at 40 weeks of gestation. There was also statistically significant agreement between the presence of the funneling and spontaneous labor within 7 days. Measurement of cervical length and detection of funneling at the internal cervical os by transvaginal ultrasonography might help us to predict the spontaneous onset of labor in a 7-day period, and help clinicians to decide about the time of labor induction in certain complicated pregnancies.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R et al.. Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  171 956-964
  • 2 Önderoğlu L S. Digital examination and transperineal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length to assess risk of preterm delivery.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997;  59 223-228
  • 3 Cetin M, Cetin A. The role of transvaginal sonography in predicting recurrent preterm labor in patients with intact membranes.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997;  74 7-11
  • 4 Guzman E R, Benito C, Hanley M. Sonography in the evaluation of the cervix during pregnancy.  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  8 99-105
  • 5 Okitsu O, Mimura T, Nakayama T, Aono T. Early prediction of preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonography.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992;  2 402-409
  • 6 Kushnir O, Vigil D A, Izquierdo L, Schiff M, Curet L B. Vaginal ultrasonographic assessment of cervical length changes during normal pregnancy.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;  162 991-993
  • 7 Brieger G M, Ning X H, Dawkins R R et al.. Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical dynamics during the third trimester of normal pregnancy.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;  76 118-122
  • 8 Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Hessabi M, Femme S. Comparison of the Bishop score, ultrasonographically measured cervical length, and fetal fibronectin assay in predicting time until delivery and type of delivery at term.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  182 108-113
  • 9 Vimercati A, Greco P, Lopalco P L et al.. The value of ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting post-term pregnancy.  J Perinat Med. 2001;  29 317-321
  • 10 Usher R H, Boyd M E, McLean F H, Kramer M S. Assessment of fetal risk in postdate pregnancies.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;  158 259-264
  • 11 Cunnigham F G, Gant N F, Leveno K J, Gilstrap L C, Hauth J C, Wenstrom K D. Williams Obstetrics, 21st ed New York; McGraw-Hill 2001: 470-481

Murat Arslan M.D. 

Menderes Mah. Bakanliklar Cad. Liparis 2 Sitesi

B-Blok Kat:8 No:15

Mezitli, Mersin, Turkey

    >