Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29(04): 298-305
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-15-04-0058
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Effects of two occlusive, hydrocolloid dressings on healing of full-thickness skin wounds in cats

Vassiliki Tsioli
1   Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Thessaly, Karditsa, Greece
,
Pagona G. Gouletsou
2   Department of Obstetrics and Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Thessaly, Karditsa, Greece
,
Apostolos D. Galatos
1   Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Thessaly, Karditsa, Greece
,
Dimitra Psalla
3   Laboratory of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Antonis Lymperis
1   Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Thessaly, Karditsa, Greece
,
Lyssimachos G. Papazoglou
4   Department of Clinical Studies, Companion Animal Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Maria Karayannopoulou
4   Department of Clinical Studies, Companion Animal Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 10 April 2015

Accepted: 16 March 2016

Publication Date:
17 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: To determine the effects of two occlusive, hydrocolloid dressings on second intention wound healing in cats.

Methods: Three 2×2 cm full-thickness skin wounds were created on each side of the trunk of 10 cats. Two bilateral wounds were bandaged using different hydrocolloid dressings, namely Hydrocoll and DuoDerm while a semi-occlusive pad (Melolin) was applied to the third bilateral wound (control group). Wound planimetry, subjective evaluation of wound healing, and qualitative bacterial cultures were performed on the right-sided wounds, whereas left-sided wounds were subjected to histological examination.

Results: Subjective evaluation revealed accelerated (p <0.01) granulation tissue formation in hydrocolloid-treated wounds. The amount of wound exudate was initially greater (p <0.01) in these wounds. Seventeen out of 120 evaluated wounds (14.2%) produced purulent exudate, 11 of which showed Staphylococcus aureus growth. Fewer control wounds (3/17) emitted puru-lent exudate, but all of them yielded moderate bacterial growth as compared to hydrocolloid-treated wounds (8/17) which had a low incidence of bacterial growth. The only significant difference in histological variables was increased cellular infiltration noted on day 7 in Hydrocoll-treated wounds compared to controls. No significant differences in planimetry variables were found between groups.

Clinical significance: Despite the initially increased amount of wound exudate and the low growth of Staphylococcus aureus, hydrocolloid dressings accelerate granulation tissue formation and can hence be suggested for second intention wound healing in cats.

Keywords

Cat - feline - hydrocolloid dressing - occlusive dressing - second intention wound healing
 

  • References

  • 1 Dyson M, Young SR, Len Pendle C. et al. Comparison of the effects of moist and dry conditions on dermal repair. J Invest Dermatol 1992; 99: 729-733.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Turner TD. Interactive dressings used in the management of human soft tissue injuries and their potential in veterinary practice. Vet Dermatol 1997; 8: 235-242.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Eaglstein WH. Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings: a clinical focus. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27: 175-181.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 MacPhail CM. Surgery of the integumentary system. In Fossum TW. editor Small Animal Surgery 4th edition. St.. Louis: Mosby; 2013: 190-288.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Swaim SF. Wound dressing materials and topical medications. In Swaim SF, Henderson Jr RA. editors Small Animal Wound Management 2nd edition.. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1997: 53-85.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Pavletic MM. Atlas of Small Animal Wound Management and Reconstructive Surgery. 3rd edition. Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Kannon GA, Garrett AB. Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings: a clinical review. Dermatol Surg 1995; 21: 583-590.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 De Coninck A, Draye JP, Van Strubarq A. et al. Healing of full-thickness wounds in pigs: effects of occlusive and non-occlusive dressings associated with a gel vehicle. J Dermatol Sci 1996; 13: 202-211.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Campbell BG. Dressings, bandages, and splints for wound management in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2006; 36: 759-792.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Krahwinkel DJ, Boothe HW. Topical and systemic medications for wounds. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2006; 36: 739-758.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Howard RD, Stashak TS, Baxter GM. Evaluation of occlusive dressings for management of full-thickness excisional wounds on the distal portion of the limbs of horses. Am J Vet Res 1993; 12: 2150-2154.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Cockbill SME, Turner TD. Management of veterinary wounds. Vet Rec 1995; 136: 362-365.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Stashak TS, Farstvedt E, Othic A. Update on wound dressings: indications and best use. Clin Tech Eq Pract 2004; 3: 148-163.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Agren MS, Mertz PM, Franztn L. A comparative study of three occlusive dressings in the treatment of full-thickness wounds in pigs. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36: 53-58.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Morgan PW, Binnington AG, Miller CW. et al. The effect of occlusive and semi-occlusive dressings on the healing of acute full-thickness skin wounds on the forelimbs of dogs. Vet Surg 1994; 23: 494-502.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Abramo F, Argiolas S, Pisani G. et al. 2008. Effect of a hydrocolloid dressing on first intention healing surgical wounds in the dog: a pilot study. Aust Vet J 2008; 86: 95-99.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Bohling MW, Henderson RA, Swaim SF. et al. Cutaneous wound healing in the cat: A macroscopic description and comparison with cutaneous wound healing in the dog. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 579-587.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 van Hengel T, ter Haar G, Kirpensteijn J. Wound management: a new protocol for dogs and cats. In Kirpensteijn J, ter Haar G. editors Reconstructive Surgery and Wound Management of the Dog and Cat. London: Manson Publishing; 2013: 21-48.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Ramsey DT, Pope ER, Wagner-Mann C. et al. Effects of three occlusive dressing materials on healing of full-thickness skin wounds in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1995; 56: 941-949.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Bohling MW, Henderson RA, Swaim SF. et al. Comparison of the role of the subcutaneous tissues in cutaneous wound healing in the dog and cat. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 3-14.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Winkler JT, Swaim SF, Sartin EA. et al. The effect of a porcine-derived small intestinal submucosa product on wounds with exposed bone in dogs. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 541-551.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Gillette RL, Swaim SF, Sartin EA. et al. Effects of a bioactive glass on healing of closed skin wounds in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 1149-1153.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Swaim SF, Gillette RL, Sartin EA. et al. Effects of a hydrolyzed collagen dressing on the healing of open wounds in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61: 1574-1578.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Court MH, Bellenger CR. Comparison of adhesive polyurethane membrane and polypropylene sutures for closure of skin incisions in cats. Vet Surg 1989; 18: 211-215.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Bolton LL, Johnson CL, Rijswijk LV. Occlusive dressings: Therapeutic agents and effects on drug delivery. Clin Dermatol 1992; 9: 573-583.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Alvarez OM, Mertz PM, Eaglstein WH. The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen synthesis and re-epithelialization in superficial wounds. J Surg Res 1983; 35: 142-148.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Katz MH, Alvarez AF, Kirsner RS. et al. Human wound fluid from acute wounds stimulates fibroblast and endothelial cell growth. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 25: 1054-1058.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Lee AH, Swaim SF, Yang ST. et al. The effects of petrolatum, polyethylene glycol, nitrofurazone, and a hydroactive dressing on open wound healing. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 443-451.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Etris MB, Pribble J, LaBrecque J. Evaluation of two wound measurement methods in a multi-center, controlled study. Ostomy Wound Manag 1994; 40: 44-48.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Young SR, Dyson M, Hickman R. et al. Comparison of the effects of semi-occlusive polyurethane dressings and hydrocolloid dressings on dermal repair: 1. Cellular Changes. J Invest Dermatol 1991; 97: 586-592.
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar