Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1219364
A Flexible Approach to the Chromenoquinolines under Copper/Lewis Acid Catalysis
Publication History
Publication Date:
02 February 2010 (online)
Abstract
The synthesis of chromenoquinolines via cyclization of different substituted anilines or naphthylamine with O-propargylated salicylaldehydes using CuI/La(OTf)3 as an efficient catalyst in the reflux temperature of acetonitrile is reported.
Key words
chromenoquinoline - estrogenic agents - catalyst
- Supporting Information for this article is available online:
- Supporting Information
- 1
Campbell N. Rodd’s Chemistry of Carbon Compounds Vol. IVf: Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1976. p.231-235 - 2
Balasubramanian M.Keay JG. Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II Pergamon Press; Oxford: . -
3a
Nies TW.Taylor AS. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 8th ed.: Pergamon Press; New York: 1990. Chap. 58. p.1397-1412 -
3b
Savouret JF.Chauchereau AE. Hum. Reprod. 1994, 9: 7 - 4
Jones TK,Goldmani ,Hamann LG, andDavis RL. inventors; WO 96/19458. -
5a
Martin BR.Shahnazari M.Lee WH.Helferich WG.Qian J.Waters DJ.Arabshahi A.Barnes S.Welch J. J. Nutr. 2009, 139: 1908 -
5b
Suwandi LS.Agoston GE.Shah JH. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19: 6459 -
5c
Harmer GLM.Broom WA. Lancet 1948, 2: 766 -
6a
Mendelsohn K.Karas RH. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 340: 1801 -
6b
Epperson CN.Katherine LW.Bryan Y. Psychosom. Med. 1999, 61: 676 -
6c
Crandall CJ.
J. Womens Health Gend. Base Med. 1999, 8: 1155 -
6d
Monk D.Brodaty H. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2000, 11: 1 -
6e
Hurn PD.Macrae IM. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2000, 20: 631 -
6f
Calvin M. Maturitas 2000, 34: 195 - 7
Swaminathan KS.Ganesh RS.Venkatachalam CS.Balasubramanian KK. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24: 3653 - 8
Ibrahim YA.Ahmed HM. J. Chem. Res., Synop. 1999, 254 - 9
Tomashevskaya MM.Potekhin AA. Russ. Org. Chem. 2007, 43: 77 - 10
Rabin B.Dhananjaya SNS.Ramu B.Sai UK.Rajender K.Mukkanti K.Pal M. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 582 -
11a
Li Z.Li C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126: 11810 -
11b
Choudary BM.Sridhar C.Kantam ML.Sreedhar B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 7319 -
11c
Bieber LW.Silva MF.Menezes PH. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 8281 -
11d
Benaglia M.Negri D.Dell’Anna G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 8705 -
11e
Black DA.Arndtsen BA. Org. Lett. 2004, 6: 1107 -
12a
Sebastien R.Janine C. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108: 5359 -
12b
Matthew W.Valery VF. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45: 3157 -
12c
Syeda HHZ.Rajkumar H.Singh SK.Das J.Javed I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43: 6485 -
12d
Fengping X.Yulin C.Yu L.Jianbo W. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 2755 -
13a
Li CJ. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35: 533 -
13b
Dyker G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38: 1698 - 14
Wei C.Li Z.Li CJ. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 4473 - 15
Wei C.Li CJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125: 9584 - 16
Shi L.Tu YQ.Wang M.Zhang FM.Fan CA. Org. Lett. 2004, 6: 1001
References and Notes
The CCDC deposition number of 3c is 753403; molecular formula: C17H13NO2,
chemical formula weight 263.28, monoclinic, unit cell parameters: a = 13.037 (8), b = 7.587 (4), c = 13.158
(8), β = 97.576 (9),
space group P21/c.
The CCDC deposition number
of 6a is 753401; molecular formula: C30H13NO,
chemical formula weight 283.31, monoclinic, unit cell parameters: a = 8.6729 (14), b = 15.418 (3), c = 10.8031 (18), β = 106.891 (2), space
group P21/c.
The CCDC deposition number of 3b is 753402; molecular formula: C17H13NO,
chemical formula weight 247.29, monoclinic, unit cell parameters: a = 12.9795 (11), b = 23.1902 (19), c = 8.4440 (7), β = 95.2790 (10), space
group P21/c.
The CCDC deposition number of 3f is 753404; molecular formula: C16H10ClNO,
chemical formula weight 267.71, monoclinic, unit cell parameters: a = 31.333 (3), b = 3.8586 (4), c = 40.188 (5), β = 102.334 (4), space
group C2/c.
A Typical Procedure
for the Preparation of 3a
In a round-bottom flask
equipped with a magnetic stirring bar, aniline (1a,
1.0 mmol), O-propargylated salicylaldehyde (2a,
1.0 mmol) in MeCN (20 mL), was added La(OTf)3 (10 mol%)
and CuI (10 mol%). Reaction mixture was stirred at reflux
temperature of MeCN for 4 h. After completion of the reaction, as
indicated by the TLC, the MeCN was evaporated and H2O
(20 mL) was added to the crude reaction mass. Then aqueous layer
was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 20
mL), and the combined organic layers were dried over anhyd Na2SO4,
filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The product was
purified by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane-EtOAc)
afforded 3a (0.210 g, 90%); mp
126 ˚C. IR (KBr): 3051, 2295, 1649, 1033, 740 cm-¹. ¹H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, TMS): δ = 8.48
(1 H, d, J = 8.0
Hz), 8.11 (1 H, d, J = 8.0
Hz), 7.81 (1 H, s), 7.72 (1 H, d, J = 7.5
Hz), 7.67 (1 H, t, J = 7.5
Hz), 7.46 (1 H, t, J = 6.5
Hz), 7.36 (1 H, t, J = 7.5
Hz), 7.16 (1 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz),
7.01 (1 H, d, J = 7.5
Hz), 5.32 (2 H, s). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3, TMS): δ = 157.4, 149.0, 148.3,
131.8, 130.9, 129.5, 129.4, 127.5, 127.4, 126.2, 125.5, 125.2, 123.2, 122.5,
117.3 (arom. C); 68.4 (aliph. C). MS (+): m/z = 234 [M + H].
Anal. Calcd for C16H11NO: C, 82.38; H, 4.75;
N, 6.00. Found: C, 82.25; H, 4.80; N, 6.12.