Download PDF
Synlett 2017; 28(16): 2126-2130
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1590815
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Ethynylation of Isoquinoline and Quinoline Derivatives with Calcium Carbide

Alireza Samzadeh-Kermani
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran   Email: drsamzadeh@gmail.com
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 23 March 2017

Accepted after revision: 31 May 2017

Publication Date:
14 July 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category


Abstract

An operatically simple method for the ethynylation of isoquinolines and quinolines is described. The ionic adduct derived from an alkynoic ester and the N-heterocycle was attacked by calcium carbide to give the ethynylation product. The procedure uses tetrabutylammonium fluoride trihydrate as a catalyst in aqueous N,N-dimethylacetamide. Steric and electronic effects of various substituents on the outcome of the reaction were examined.

Key words

ethynylation - isoquinolines - quinolines - calcium carbide - multicomponent reaction - alkynoic ester

Supporting Information

    Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1590815.
  • Supporting Information
 

  • References and Notes

  • 1 Dayaker G. Durand T. Balas L. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 2657
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Piersanti G. Bartoccini F. Lucarini S. Cabri W. Stasi MA. Riccioni T. Borsini F. Tarzia G. Minetti P. J. Med. Chem. 2013; 56: 5456
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Jin L. Hao W. Xu J. Sun N. Hu B. Shen Z. Mo W. Hu X. Chem. Commun. 2017; 53: 4124
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Shibata T. Hirashima H. Kasagawa M. Tsuchikama K. Endo K. Synlett 2011; 2171
    Thieme Connect
  • 5 Adeleke AF. Brown AP. N. Cheng L.-J. Mosleh KA. M. Cordier JC. Synthesis 2017; 49: 790
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Teles JH. Brode S. Chabanas M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998; 37: 1415
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Liao WW. Müller TJ. J. Synlett 2006; 3469
    Thieme Connect
  • 8 Ghazanfarpour-Darjani M. Babapour-Kooshalshahi M. Mousavi-Safavi SM. Akbari-Neyestani J. Khalaj M. Synlett 2016; 27: 259
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Samzadeh-Kermani A. Synlett 2015; 26: 643
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Knöpfel TF. Carreira EM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 6054
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 de Armas P. Tejedor D. García-Tellado F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 1013
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Wöhler F. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1862; 124: 220
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Rodygin KS. Werner G. Kucherov FA. Ananikov VP. Chem. Asian J. 2016; 11: 965
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Kaewchangwat N. Sukato R. Vchirawongkwin V. Vilaivan T. Sukwattanasinitt M. Wacharasindhu S. Green Chem. 2015; 17: 460
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Rattanangkool E. Vilaivan T. Sukwattanasinitt M. Wacharasindhu S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 4244
  • 16 Sum YN. Yu D. Zhang Y. Green Chem. 2013; 15: 2718
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Yu D. Sum YN. Ean AC. C. Chin MP. Zhang Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 5125
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Lin Z. Yu D. Sum YN. Zhang Y. ChemSusChem 2012; 5: 625
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Rodygin KS. Ananikov VP. Green Chem 2016; 18: 482
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Yang Q. Jiang Y. Kuang C. Helv. Chim. Acta 2012; 95: 448
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Hosseini A. Seidel D. Miska A. Schreiner PR. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 2808
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Taylor AM. Schreiber SL. Org. Lett. 2006; 8: 143
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Samzadeh-Kermani A. Tetrahedron 2016; 72: 5301
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Samzadeh-Kermani A. Synlett 2016; 27: 2213
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Samzadeh-Kermani A. Monatsh. Chem. 2016; 147: 761
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Samzadeh-Kermani A. Synlett 2016; 27: 461
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Fischer R. Gärtner M. Görls H. Westerhausen M. Organometallics 2006; 25: 3496
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Wiegrebe W. Kramer WJ. Shamma M. J. Nat. Prod. 1984; 47: 397
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Huff JR. Anderson PS. Baldwin JJ. Clinesschmidt BV. Guare JP. Lotti VJ. Pettibone DJ. Randale WC. Vacca JP. J. Med. Chem. 1985; 28: 1756
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 N-Alkynylisoquinolines 4 and N-Alkynylquinolines 6; General Procedure The N-heterocycle (1.1 mmol), acetylenic ester (1.0 mmol), carbide (2 mmol, 0.13 g), and TBAF·3 H2O (0.1–0.2 mmol; see Tables 2 and 3) were added to 1% H2O–DMA (3 mL), and the mixture was stirred at 55 °C for 6 h. When the reaction was complete, the mixture was diluted with EtOAc (5 mL) and sat. aq NH4Cl (5 mL). The mixture was stirred for an additional 30 min and then the two layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL), and the combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by chromatography [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc (5:1)]. Dimethyl (2E)-2-(1-Ethynylisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)but-2-enedioate (4a) Clear oil; yield: 0.27 g (91%). IR (KBr): 3055, 2981, 2229, 1731, 1723, 1546, 1320, 1126 cm–1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.56 (d, 3 J = 2.1, 1 H, CH), 3.57 (s, 3 H, MeO), 3.69 (s, 3 H, MeO), 4.63 (d, 3 J = 2.1, 1 H, CH), 5.75 (d, 3 J = 6.4, 1 H, CH), 6.46 (d, 3 J = 7.1, 1 H, CH), 6.63 (s, 1 H, CH), 7.21–7.37 (m, 4 H, 4 × CH). 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 53.6 (MeO), 55.9 (MeO), 62.5 (CH), 72.1 (CH), 83.5 (C), 101.6 (CH), 112.1 (CH), 124.3 (CH), 126.7 (CH), 127.1 (CH), 127.9 (CH), 128.8 (CH), 135.4 (C), 139.0 (C), 149.1 (C), 165.3 (C), 166.8 (C). EI-MS: m/z = 297 (12) [M+], 272 (25), 154 (51), 142 (67), 129 (100), 54 (38). Anal. Calcd for C17H15NO4 (297.31): C, 68.68; H, 5.09; N, 4.71. Found: C, 68.92; H, 5.43; N, 4.97. Dimethyl (2Z)-2-(2-Ethynylquinolin-1(2H)-yl)but-2-enedioate (6a) Clear oil; yield: 0.24 g (82%). IR (KBr): 3081, 2953, 2197, 1736, 1728, 1567, 1341, 1118 cm–1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.76 (d, 3 J = 2.0, 1 H, CH), 3.55 (s, 3 H, MeO), 3.91 (s, 3 H, MeO), 4.12 (dd, 3 J = 2.0, 3 J = 6.2, 1 H, CH), 5.50 (s, 1 H, CH), 5.79 (d, 3 J = 6.8, 1 H, CH), 6.42 (d, 3 J = 6.5, 1 H, CH), 6.94 (t, 3 J = 6.1, 1 H, CH), 7.20 (d, 3 J = 6.1, 1 H, CH), 7.25 (d, 3 J = 6.1, 1 H, CH), 7.36 (t, 3 J = 7.0, 1 H, CH). 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 54.1 (MeO), 57.2 (MeO), 63.1 (CH), 73.4 (CH), 82.9 (C), 109.1 (CH), 116.1 (CH), 119.1 (CH), 120.4 (C), 126.1 (CH), 127.0 (CH), 128.2 (CH), 129.5 (CH), 139.8 (C), 143.7 (C), 165.1 (C), 166.3 (C). EI-MS: m/z = 297 (8) [M+], 272 (41), 154 (31), 142 (72), 129 (100), 54 (67). Calcd for C17H15NO4 (297.31): C, 68.68; H, 5.09; N, 4.71. Found: C, 68.87; H, 5.34; N, 4.93. Dimethyl 11bH-Pyrido[2,1-a]isoquinoline-3,4-dicarboxylate (10) A solution of isoquinoline derivative 4a (1.0 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (1 mL) was added to a stirred mixture of AgOTf or AgBF6 (20 mol%) and 1,4-dioxane (2 mL), and the resulting mixture was heated to 70 °C for 16 h. When the reaction was complete, the mixture was diluted with EtOAc (5 mL) and sat. aq NH4Cl (5 mL). The mixture was stirred for an additional 30 min, and the two layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL), and the combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by chromatography [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc (3:1)] to give a yellow oil; yield: 0.15 g (51%). IR (KBr): 3046, 2967, 1731, 1718, 1647, 1470, 1345, 1227 cm–1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.71 (s, 3 H, MeO), 3.90 (s, 3 H, MeO), 4.79 (d, 3 J = 6.7, 1 H, CH), 5.79 (d, 3J = 6.5, 1 H, CH), 6.35 (d, 3 J = 6.2, 1 H, CH), 6.45 (d, 3 J = 6.2, 1 H, CH), 6.78 (d, 3 J = 6.5, 1 H, CH), 7.27–7.36 (m, 4 H, 4 CH). 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 52.6 (MeO), 56.1 (MeO), 69.2 (CH), 102.1 (CH), 112.2 (CH), 117.1 (C), 125.3 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 126.7 (CH), 128.1 (CH), 128.7 (CH), 130.9 (CH), 133.1 (C), 137.2 (C), 148.2 (CH), 166.8 (C), 167.8 (C). EI-MS: m/z = 297 (3) [M+], 266 (34), 235 (41), 208 (100), 180 (76). Calcd for C17H15NO4 (297.31): C, 68.68; H, 5.09; N, 4.71. Found: C, 68.82; H, 5.37; N, 4.96.