Download PDF
Ultraschall Med 2017; 38(03): 273-284
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-115410
Guidelines & Recommendations
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

EFSUMB Recommendations and Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound - Part 1: Examination Techniques and Normal Findings (Short version)

EFSUMB-Empfehlungen und Leitlinien des Gastrointestinalen Ultraschalls - Teil 1: Untersuchungstechniken und Normalbefund (Kurzversion)
Kim Nylund
1   National Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
,
Giovanni Maconi
2   Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, “L.Sacco” University Hospital, Milan, Italy
,
Alois Hollerweger
3   Department of Radiology, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Salzburg, Austria
,
Tomas Ripolles
4   Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
,
Nadia Pallotta
5   Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy
,
Antony Higginson
6   Department of Radiology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Carla Serra
7   Department of Digestive System, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital and University of Bologna, Italy
,
Christoph F. Dietrich
8   Department of Internal Medicine 2, Caritas Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
,
Ioan Sporea
9   Dept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, "Victor Babes", University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Romania
,
Adrian Saftoiu
10   Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania
,
Klaus Dirks
11   Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Rems-Murr-Klinikum Winnenden, Germany
,
Trygve Hausken
12   Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
,
Emma Calabrese
13   Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
,
Laura Romanini
14   Dept. of Radiology, Radiologia 1, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Italy
,
Christian Maaser
15   Outpatients Department of Gastroenterology, University Teaching Hospital Lueneburg, Germany
,
Dieter Nuernberg
16   Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany
,
Odd Helge Gilja
17   National Centre of Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 June 2016

09 August 2016

Publication Date:
07 September 2016 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

In October 2014 the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology formed a Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS) task force group to promote the use of GIUS in a clinical setting. One of the main objectives of the task force group was to develop clinical recommendations and guidelines for the use of GIUS under the auspices of EFSUMB. The first part, gives an overview of the examination techniques for GIUS recommended by experts in the field. It also presents the current evidence for the interpretation of normal sonoanatomical and physiological features as examined with different ultrasound modalities.

Zusammenfassung

Im Oktober 2014 bildete die „European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology“ einen Arbeitskreis „Gastrointestinaler Ultraschall“ (GIUS), um den Einsatz des GIUS in der klinischen Praxis voranzutreiben. Eines der Hauptziele des Arbeitskreises war die Erarbeitung klinischer Empfehlungen und Leitlinien für den Einsatz des GIUS unter der Schirmherrschaft des EFSUMB. Der erste Teil gibt einen Überblick über die Untersuchungsmethoden des GIUS, wie er von Experten auf diesem Gebiet empfohlen wurde. Außerdem wird die derzeit aktuelle Evidenz für die Interpretation normaler sonoanatomischer und physiologischer Merkmale, wie sie mit unterschiedlichen Ultraschallmethoden untersucht wurden, präsentiert.

Key words

guideline - ultrasound - gastrointestinal - examination technique - normal variants
 

  • References

  • 1 Panes J. Bouzas R. Chaparro M. et al. Systematic review: the use of ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis, assessment of activity and abdominal complications of Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 125-145
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Panes J. Bouhnik Y. Reinisch W. et al. Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. J Crohns Colitis 2013; 7: 556-585
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Bamber J. Cosgrove D. Dietrich CF. et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 169-184
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Claudon M. Dietrich CF. Choi BI. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39: 187-210
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Cosgrove D. Piscaglia F. Bamber J. et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 238-253
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Dietrich CF. Lorentzen T. Sidhu PS. et al. An Introduction to the EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS). Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 460-463
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Jenssen C. Brkljacic B. Hocke M. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part VI – Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Interventions. Ultraschall in Med 2015; Nov 18.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Jenssen C. Hocke M. Fusaroli P. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV – EUS-guided interventions: General Aspects and EUS-guided Sampling (Short Version). Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: 157-169
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Lorentzen T. Nolsoe CP. Ewertsen C. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. General Aspects (Short Version). Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 464-472
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Piscaglia F. Nolsoe C. Dietrich CF. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 33: 33-59
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Sidhu PS. Brabrand K. Cantisani V. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part II. Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: E15-E35
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Howick J. Chalmers I. Glasziou P. et al. The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group, Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. 2009 Available from: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Haber HP. Stern M. Intestinal ultrasonography in children and young adults: bowel wall thickness is age dependent. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 315-321
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Nylund K. Hausken T. Odegaard S. et al. Gastrointestinal wall thickness measured with transabdominal ultrasonography and its relationship to demographic factors in healthy subjects. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33: E225-E232
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Aibe T. Fuji T. Okita K. et al. A fundamental study of normal layer structure of the gastrointestinal wall visualized by endoscopic ultrasonography. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1986; 123: 6-15
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Boscaini M. Moscini PL. Montori A. Transrectal ultrasonography: interpretation of normal intestinal wall structure for the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1986; 123: 87-98
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kimmey MB. Martin RW. Haggitt RC. et al. Histologic correlates of gastrointestinal ultrasound images. Gastroenterology 1989; 96: 433-441
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Rompel O. Huelsse B. Bodenschatz K. et al. Harmonic US imaging of appendicitis in children. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36: 1257-1264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Schmidt T. Hohl C. Haage P. et al. Phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging compared to fundamental B-mode ultrasound in the evaluation of the pathology of large and small bowel. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 2021-2030
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Ying M. Sin MH. Comparison of extended field of view and dual image ultrasound techniques: accuracy and reliability of distance measurements in phantom study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 79-83
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Troger J. Darge K. SieScape--a new dimension of ultrasound imaging in pediatric radiology. Radiologe 1998; 38: 417-419
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Giovagnorio F. Diacinti D. Vernia P. Doppler sonography of the superior mesenteric artery in Crohn's disease. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 123-126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Maconi G. Parente F. Bollani S. et al. Factors affecting splanchnic haemodynamics in Crohn's disease: a prospective controlled study using Doppler ultrasound. Gut 1998; 43: 645-650
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Mirk P. Palazzoni G. Gimondo P. Doppler sonography of hemodynamic changes of the inferior mesenteric artery in inflammatory bowel disease: preliminary data. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 381-387
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Van Oostayen JA. Wasser MN. van Hogezand RA. et al. Activity of Crohn disease assessed by measurement of superior mesenteric artery flow with Doppler US. Radiology 1994; 193: 551-554
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Dietrich CF. Jedrzejczyk M. Ignee A. Sonographic assessment of splanchnic arteries and the bowel wall. Eur J Radiol 2007; 64: 202-212
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Ignee A. Boerner N. Bruening A. et al. Duplexsonography of the mesenteric vessels – a critical evaluation of inter observer variability. Z Gastroenterol 2016; 54: 304-311
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Nylund K. Hausken T. Gilja OH. Ultrasound and inflammatory bowel disease. Ultrasound Q 2010; 26: 3-15
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Van Oostayen JA. Wasser MN. Griffioen G. et al. Activity of Crohn's disease assessed by measurement of superior mesenteric artery flow with Doppler ultrasound. Neth J Med 1998; 53: S3-S8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Ruess L. Blask AR. Bulas DI. et al. Inflammatory bowel disease in children and young adults: correlation of sonographic and clinical parameters during treatment. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 79-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Spalinger J. Patriquin H. Miron MC. et al. Doppler US in patients with crohn disease: vessel density in the diseased bowel reflects disease activity. Radiology 2000; 217: 787-791
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Patriquin HB. Garcier JM. Lafortune M. et al. Appendicitis in children and young adults: Doppler sonographic-pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 629-633
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Ripolles T. Simo L. Martinez-Perez MJ. et al. Sonographic findings in ischemic colitis in 58 patients. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 777-785
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Drews BH. Barth TF. Hanle MM. et al. Comparison of sonographically measured bowel wall vascularity, histology, and disease activity in Crohn's disease. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 1379-1386
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Neye H. Voderholzer W. Rickes S. et al. Evaluation of criteria for the activity of Crohn's disease by power Doppler sonography. Dig Dis 2004; 22: 67-72
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Esteban JM. Maldonado L. Sanchiz V. et al. Activity of Crohn's disease assessed by colour Doppler ultrasound analysis of the affected loops. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1423-1428
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Ripolles T. Martinez MJ. Morote V. et al. Appendiceal involvement in Crohn's disease: gray-scale sonography and color Doppler flow features. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 1071-1078
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Rapaccini GL. Pompili M. Orefice R. et al. Contrast-enhanced power doppler of the intestinal wall in the evaluation of patients with Crohn disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004; 39: 188-194
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Robotti D. Cammarota T. Debani P. et al. Activity of Crohn disease: value of Color-Power-Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging 2004; 29: 648-652
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Serra C. Menozzi G. Labate AM. et al. Ultrasound assessment of vascularization of the thickened terminal ileum wall in Crohn's disease patients using a low-mechanical index real-time scanning technique with a second generation ultrasound contrast agent. Eur J Radiol 2007; 62: 114-121
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Incesu L. Yazicioglu AK. Selcuk MB. et al. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler US in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur J Radiol 2004; 50: 201-209
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Kratzer W. Schmidt SA. Mittrach C. et al. Contrast-enhanced wideband harmonic imaging ultrasound (SonoVue): a new technique for quantifying bowel wall vascularity in Crohn's disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005; 40: 985-991
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Pauls S. Gabelmann A. Schmidt SA. et al. Evaluating bowel wall vascularity in Crohn's disease: a comparison of dynamic MRI and wideband harmonic imaging contrast-enhanced low MI ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2410-2417
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Schreyer AG. Finkenzeller T. Gossmann H. et al. Microcirculation and perfusion with contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in Crohn's disease: first results with linear contrast harmonic imaging (CHI). Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2008; 40: 143-155
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Cui XW. Ignee A. Jedrzejczyk M. et al. Dynamic Vascular Pattern (DVP), a quantification tool for contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 427-431
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Dietrich CF. Averkiou MA. Correas JM. et al. An EFSUMB introduction into Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33: 344-351
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Frohlich E. Muller R. Cui XW. et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantification of tissue perfusion. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34: 179-196
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Jirik R. Nylund K. Gilja O. et al. Ultrasound perfusion analysis combining bolus-tracking and burst-replenishment. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2013; 60: 310-319
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Nylund K. Jirik R. Mezl M. et al. Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound comparison between inflammatory and fibrotic lesions in patients with Crohn's disease. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39: 1197-1206
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Romanini L. Passamonti M. Navarria M. et al. Quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the bowel wall can predict disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83: 1317-1323
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Esteban JM. Aleixandre A. Hurtado MJ. et al. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of inflammatory abdominal masses in Crohn's disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 15: 253-259
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Ripolles T. Martinez-Perez MJ. Paredes JM. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation between phlegmon and abscess in Crohn's disease and other abdominal conditions. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: e525-e531
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Havre R. Gilja OH. Elastography and strain rate imaging of the gastrointestinal tract. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83: 438-441
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Giannetti A. Biscontri M. Matergi M. Feasibility of real-time strain elastography in colonic diseases. J Ultrasound 2014; 17: 321-330
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Waage JE. Leh S. Rosler C. et al. Endorectal ultrasonography, strain elastography and MRI differentiation of rectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17: 124-131
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Waage JE. Bach SP. Pfeffer F. et al. Combined endorectal ultrasonography and strain elastography for the staging of early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17: 50-56
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Allgayer H. Ignee A. Zipse S. et al. Endorectal ultrasound and real-time elastography in patients with fecal incontinence following anorectal surgery: a prospective comparison evaluating short- and long-term outcomes in irradiated and non-irradiated patients. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 1281-1286
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Allgayer H. Ignee A. Dietrich CF. Endosonographic elastography of the anal sphincter in patients with fecal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 30-38
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Baumgart DC. Muller HP. Grittner U. et al. US-based Real-time Elastography for the Detection of Fibrotic Gut Tissue in Patients with Stricturing Crohn Disease. Radiology 2015; 275: 889-899
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Fraquelli M. Branchi F. Cribiu FM. et al. The Role of Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging in Predicting Ileal Fibrosis in Crohn's Disease Patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015; 21: 2605-2612
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Gilja OH. Education and Practical Standards Committee, EFSUMB. Minimum Training recommendations for the practice of medical ultrasound. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27: 79-105
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Sinan T. Leven H. Sheikh M. Is fasting a necessary preparation for abdominal ultrasound?. BMC Med Imaging 2003; 3: 1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Ehrenstein BP. Froh S. Schlottmann K. et al. To eat or not to eat? Effect of fasting prior to abdominal sonography examinations on the quality of imaging under routine conditions: A randomized, examiner-blinded trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009; 44: 1048-1054
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Dauzat M. Lafortune M. Patriquin H. et al. Meal induced changes in hepatic and splanchnic circulation: a noninvasive Doppler study in normal humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1994; 68: 373-380
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Matheson PJ. Wilson MA. Garrison RN. Regulation of intestinal blood flow. J Surg Res 2000; 93: 182-196
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Qamar MI. Read AE. Effects of ingestion of carbohydrate, fat, protein, and water on the mesenteric blood flow in man. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988; 23: 26-30
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Sidery MB. Macdonald IA. Blackshaw PE. Superior mesenteric artery blood flow and gastric emptying in humans and the differential effects of high fat and high carbohydrate meals. Gut 1994; 35: 186-190
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Stubbs TA. Macdonald IA. Within- and between-day variability in transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound measurements of superior mesenteric artery blood flow (SMABF) in the fasted state. Physiol Meas 1998; 19: 181-187
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Qamar MI. Read AE. Effects of exercise on mesenteric blood flow in man. Gut 1987; 28: 583-587
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Hollerweger A. Dirks K. Szopinski K. Transabdominal ultrasound of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Dietrich CF. , editor. EFSUMB Course Book on Ultrasound. 2012: 233-271
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 71 Maconi G. Rigazio C. Ercole E. Bowel Ultrasound: Investigation Technique and Normal Findings. In: Maconi G. Bianchi PorroG. , editors. Ultrasound of the Gastrointestinal tract. 2nd ed. Springer; 2014: 7-17
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 72 Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 1986; 158: 355-360
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 73 Puylaert JB. Rutgers PH. Lalisang RI. et al. A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 666-669
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 74 Jeffrey Jr RB. Laing FC. Lewis FR. Acute appendicitis: high-resolution real-time US findings. Radiology 1987; 163: 11-14
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 75 Niekel RA. Lampmann LE. Graded compression sonography in acute appendicitis. Rofo 1986; 145: 441-445
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 76 Carroll PJ. Gibson D. El-Faedy O. et al. Surgeon-performed ultrasound at the bedside for the detection of appendicitis and gallstones: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2013; 205: 102-108
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 77 Siegel MJ. Friedland JA. Hildebolt CF. Bowel wall thickening in children: differentiation with US. Radiology 1997; 203: 631-635
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 78 Schwerk WB. Schwarz S. Rothmund M. Sonography in acute colonic diverticulitis. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 1077-1084
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 79 Lameris W. van RA. Bipat S. et al. Graded compression ultrasonography and computed tomography in acute colonic diverticulitis: meta-analysis of test accuracy. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2498-2511
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 80 Parra DA. Navarro OM. Sonographic diagnosis of intestinal polyps in children. Pediatr Radiol 2008; 38: 680-684
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 81 Pallotta N. Baccini F. Corazziari E. Ultrasonography of the small bowel after oral administration of anechoic contrast solution. Lancet 1999; 353: 985-986
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 82 Folvik G. Bjerke-Larssen T. Odegaard S. et al. Hydrosonography of the small intestine: comparison with radiologic barium study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999; 34: 1247-1252
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 83 Limberg B. Diagnosis and staging of colonic tumors by conventional abdominal sonography as compared with hydrocolonic sonography. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 65-69
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 84 European Commitee for MEdical Ultrasound Safety (ECMUS). EFSUMB clinical safety statement for diagnostic ultrasound (2015). European Commitee for Medical Ultrasound Safety (ECMUS). 2015 Available from: http://www.efsumb.org/guidelines/ss2015clinical.pdf
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 85 Wiersema MJ. Wiersema LM. High-resolution 25-megahertz ultrasonography of the gastrointestinal wall: histologic correlates. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 499-504
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 86 Goldstein NS. Soman A. Sacksner J. Disparate surgical margin lengths of colorectal resection specimens between in vivo and in vitro measurements – The effects of surgical resection and formalin fixation on organ shrinkage. Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 111: 349-351
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 87 Chiorean L. Schreiber-Dietrich D. Braden B. et al. Transabdominal ultrasound for standardized measurement of bowel wall thickness in normal children and those with Crohn's disease. Med Ultrason 2014; 16: 319-324
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 88 Dialer I. Hundt C. Bertele-Harms RM. et al. Sonographic evaluation of bowel wall thickness in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003; 37: 55-60
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 89 Haber HP. Busch A. Ziebach R. et al. Bowel wall thickness measured by ultrasound as a marker of Crohn's disease activity in children. Lancet 2000; 355: 1239-1240
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 90 Huh CH. Bhutani MS. Farfan EB. et al. Individual variations in mucosa and total wall thickness in the stomach and rectum assessed via endoscopic ultrasound. Physiol Meas 2003; 24: N15-N22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 91 Sandek A. Bauditz J. Swidsinski A. et al. Altered intestinal function in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 1561-1569
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 92 Ferri E. Bonvicini U. Pisani M. Ultrasonography of normal vermiform appendix. Chir Ital 2001; 53: 231-238
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 93 Simonovsky V. Sonographic detection of normal and abnormal appendix. Clin Radiol 1999; 54: 533-539
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 94 Simonovsky V. Normal appendix: is there any significant difference in the maximal mural thickness at US between pediatric and adult populations?. Radiology 2002; 224: 333-337
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 95 Kimmey MB. Hwang JH. Assessment of the Layered Structure of the Gastrointestinal Tract. In: Ødegaard S. Gilja OH. Gregersen H. , editors. Basic and New Aspects of Gastrointestinal Ultrasonography. Singapore: World Scientific; 2005: 167-188
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 96 Odegaard S. Kimmey MB. Location of the muscularis mucosae on high frequency gastrointestinal ultrasound images. Eur J Ultrasound 1994; 1: 39-50
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 97 Silverstein F. Kimmey M. Martin R. et al. Ultrasound and the intestinal wall: experimental methods. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1986; 123: 34-40
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 98 Jorgensen CS. Dall FH. Jensen SL. et al. A new combined high-frequency ultrasound-impedance planimetry measuring system for the quantification of organ wall biomechanics in vivo. J Biomech 1995; 28: 863-867
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 99 Odegaard S. Kimmey MB. Martin RW. et al. The effects of applied pressure on the thickness, layers, and echogenicity of gastrointestinal wall ultrasound images. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 351-356
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 100 Cosar S. Oktar SO. Cosar B. et al. Doppler and gray-scale ultrasound evaluation of morphological and hemodynamic changes in liver vascualture in alcoholic patients. Eur J Radiol 2005; 54: 393-399
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 101 Erden A. Cumhur T. Olcer T. Superior mesenteric artery blood flow in patients with small bowel diseases: evaluation with duplex Doppler sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1998; 26: 37-41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 102 Gentile AT. Moneta GL. Lee RW. et al. Usefulness of fasting and postprandial duplex ultrasound examinations for predicting high-grade superior mesenteric artery stenosis. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 476-479
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 103 Kalantzis N. Rouvella P. Tarazis S. et al. Doppler US of superior mesenteric artery in the assessment of ulcerative colitis. A prospective study. Hepatogastroenterology 2002; 49: 168-171
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 104 Schaberle W. Seitz K. Duplex ultrasound measurement of blood flow in the superior mesenteric artery. Ultraschall in Med 1991; 12: 277-282
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 105 Sigirci A. Baysal T. Kutlu R. et al. Doppler sonography of the inferior and superior mesenteric arteries in ulcerative colitis. J Clin Ultrasound 2001; 29: 130-139
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 106 Sjekavica I. Barbaric-Babic V. Krznaric Z. et al. Assessment of Crohn's disease activity by doppler ultrasound of superior mesenteric artery and mural arteries in thickened bowel wall: cross-sectional study. Croat Med J 2007; 48: 822-830
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 107 Dinc H. Sari A. Resit GH. et al. Portal and splanchnic haemodynamics in patients with advanced post-hepatitic cirrhosis and in healthy adults. Assessment with duplex Doppler ultrasound. Acta Radiol 1998; 39: 152-156
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 108 Ludwig D. Wiener S. Bruning A. et al. Mesenteric blood flow is related to disease activity and risk of relapse in Crohn's disease: a prospective follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 2942-2950
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 109 Piscaglia F. Zironi G. Gaiani S. et al. Relationship between splanchnic, peripheral and cardiac haemodynamics in liver cirrhosis of different degrees of severity. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997; 9: 799-804
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 110 Qamar MI. Read AE. Skidmore R. et al. Transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound measurement of superior mesenteric artery blood flow in man. Gut 1986; 27: 100-105
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 111 Ray-Chaudhuri K. Ryder SA. Thomaides T. et al. The relationship between blood flow and pulsatility index in the superior mesenteric artery at rest and during constrictor stimuli in normal subjects. J Clin Ultrasound 1994; 22: 149-160
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 112 Sato S. Ohnishi K. Sugita S. et al. Splenic artery and superior mesenteric artery blood flow: nonsurgical Doppler US measurement in healthy subjects and patients with chronic liver disease. Radiology 1987; 164: 347-352
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 113 Ergun T. Lakadamyali H. Doppler ultrasound evaluation of morphological and hemodynamical changes of hepatic and mesenteric structures in end-stage renal disease patients on regular hemodialysis. Int Urol Nephrol 2010; 42: 205-210
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 114 Sigirci A. Senol M. Aydin E. et al. Doppler waveforms and blood flow parameters of the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries in patients having Behcet disease with and without gastrointestinal symptoms: preliminary data. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 449-457
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 115 Odegaard S. Kimmey MB. Cheung AHS. et al. High frequency endosonography of gastrointestinal arteries: potential and limitations in vitro. Eur J Ultrasound 1995; 2: 313-319
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 116 Heyne R. Rickes S. Bock P. et al. Non-invasive evaluation of activity in inflammatory bowel disease by power Doppler sonography. Z Gastroenterol 2002; 40: 171-175
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 117 Scholbach T. Herrero I. Scholbach J. Dynamic color Doppler sonography of intestinal wall in patients with Crohn disease compared with healthy subjects. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004; 39: 524-528
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 118 Hollerweger A. Colonic diseases: the value of US examination. Eur J Radiol 2007; 64: 239-249
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 119 Gilja OH. Braden B. Piscaglia F. et al. Functional ultrasound of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Dietrich CF. , editor. EFSUMB Course book on ultrasound. 1 ed. London: EFSUMB; 2015: 597-620
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 120 Rettenbacher T. Hollerweger A. Macheiner P. et al. Outer diameter of the vermiform appendix as a sign of acute appendicitis: evaluation at US. Radiology 2001; 218: 757-762
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 121 Nylund K. Odegaard S. Hausken T. et al. Sonography of the small intestine. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1319-1330
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 122 Rettenbacher T. Hollerweger A. Macheiner P. et al. Adult celiac disease: US signs. Radiology 1999; 211: 389-394
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 123 Phillips SF. Functions of the large bowel: an overview. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1984; 93: 1-12
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 124 Walker TG. Mesenteric vasculature and collateral pathways. Semin Intervent Radiol 2009; 26: 167-174
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 125 Schmutz GR. Benko A. Fournier L. et al. Small bowel obstruction: role and contribution of sonography. Eur Radiol 1997; 7: 1054-1058
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 126 Pallotta N. Baccini F. Corazziari E. Small intestine contrast ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 127 Hollerweger A. Wustner M. Dirks K. Bowel Obstruction: Sonographic Evaluation. Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 216-235
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 128 Jaffe T. Thompson WM. Large-Bowel Obstruction in the Adult: Classic Radiographic and CT Findings, Etiology, and Mimics. Radiology 2015; 275: 651-663
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 129 Taniguchi DK. Martin RW. Myers J. et al. Measurement of the ultrasonic attenuation of fat at high frequency. Acad Radiol 1994; 1: 114-120
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 130 Liu KH. Chan YL. Chan WB. et al. Mesenteric fat thickness is an independent determinant of metabolic syndrome and identifies subjects with increased carotid intima-media thickness. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 379-384
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 131 Gottschalk U. Nitzsche C. Felber J. et al. Enteroscopy and imaging in sclerosing mesenteritis. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 1013-1017
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 132 Maconi G. Greco S. Duca P. et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of sonographic evidence of mesenteric fat alterations in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008; 14: 1555-1561
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 133 Puylaert JB. Ultrasound of colon diverticulitis. Dig Dis 2012; 30: 56-59
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 134 Roson N. Garriga V. Cuadrado M. et al. Sonographic findings of mesenteric panniculitis: correlation with CT and literature review. J Clin Ultrasound 2006; 34: 169-176
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 135 Vanhoenacker F. Vanwambeke K. Jacomen G. Amyloidosis: an unusual cause of mesenteric, omental and lymph node calcifications. JBR -BTR 2014; 97: 283-286
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 136 Schreiber-Dietrich D. Braden B. Chiorean L. et al. Sonografische Darstellung mesenterialer Lymphknoten bei gesunden Kindern. Endo heute 2015; 28: 149-152
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 137 Macari M. Hines J. Balthazar E. et al. Mesenteric adenitis: CT diagnosis of primary versus secondary causes, incidence, and clinical significance in pediatric and adult patients. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 853-858
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 138 Sivit CJ. Newman KD. Chandra RS. Visualization of enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes at US examination. Clinical significance. Pediatr Radiol 1993; 23: 471-475
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 139 Watanabe M. Ishii E. Hirowatari Y. et al. Evaluation of abdominal lymphadenopathy in children by ultrasonography. Pediatr Radiol 1997; 27: 860-864
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 140 Dietrich CF. Zeuzem S. Caspary WF. et al. Ultrasound lymph node imaging in the abdomen and retroperitoneum of healthy probands. Ultraschall in Med 1998; 19: 265-269
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 141 Karmazyn B. Werner EA. Rejaie B. et al. Mesenteric lymph nodes in children: what is normal?. Pediatr Radiol 2005; 35: 774-777
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 142 Lucey BC. Stuhlfaut JW. Soto JA. Mesenteric lymph nodes: detection and significance on MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 41-44
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 143 Standards for the provision of an ultrasound service. The Royal College of Radiologists, The society and college of Radiographers. 2014 Available from: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/BFCR(14)17_Standards_ultrasound.pdf
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 144 Terasawa T. Blackmore CC. Bent S. et al. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 537-546
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 145 van Randen A. Bipat S. Zwinderman AH. et al. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology 2008; 249: 97-106
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 146 Andeweg CS. Wegdam JA. Groenewoud J. et al. Toward an evidence-based step-up approach in diagnosing diverticulitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014; 49: 775-784
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 147 Andeweg CS. Mulder IM. Felt-Bersma RJ. et al. Guidelines of diagnostics and treatment of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Dig Surg 2013; 30: 278-292
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 148 Kruis W. Germer CT. Leifeld L. Diverticular disease: guidelines of the german society for gastroenterology, digestive and metabolic diseases and the german society for general and visceral surgery. Digestion 2014; 90: 190-207
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 149 Gasche C. Moser G. Turetschek K. et al. Transabdominal bowel sonography for the detection of intestinal complications in Crohn's disease. Gut 1999; 44: 112-117
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 150 Grunshaw ND. Renwick IG. Scarisbrick G. et al. Prospective evaluation of ultrasound in distal ileal and colonic obstruction. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 356-362
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 151 Unluer EE. Yavasi O. Eroglu O. et al. Ultrasonography by emergency medicine and radiology residents for the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Eur J Emerg Med 2010; 17: 260-264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 152 Hirche TO. Russler J. Schroder O. et al. The value of routinely performed ultrasonography in patients with Crohn disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 1178-1183
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 153 Dietrich CF. Lembcke B. Jenssen C. et al. Intestinal Ultrasound in Rare Gastrointestinal Diseases, Update, Part 2. Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 428-456
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 154 Maconi G. Radice E. Bareggi E. et al. Hydrosonography of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 700-708
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar