Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1394-6502
Insufficiency Fractures vs. Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures – Epidemiological, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Characteristics of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring
Article in several languages: English | deutschAbstract
Background Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) encompass two fracture entities: fracture after low-energy trauma and insufficiency fracture without trauma. It is unclear whether the two subgroups differ in terms of diagnosis and therapy. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate insufficiency fractures with regard to defined parameters and to compare specific parameters with the fractures after low-energy trauma.
Patients and Methods In the period from 2008 to 2017, 203 patients with FFP were recorded at our clinic (Level 1 Trauma Centre DGU, SAV approval). Of these, 25 had an insufficiency fracture and 178 had a pelvic ring fracture after low-energy trauma. Epidemiological, diagnostic and therapeutic parameters were examined.
Results There was a relative increase in the insufficiency fracture within the FFP (2008 – 2009: 5.0% vs. 2015 – 2017: 17.8%). In these patients, osteoporosis tended to be more pronounced than in patients after low-energy trauma (t-value: − 3.66 vs. − 3.13). The diagnosis of insufficiency fractures showed increased use of MRI and DECT (60.9% vs. 26.0%) and a high proportion of type IV fractures after FFP (40.0% vs. 7.9%). In terms of therapy, surgical treatment of the insufficiency fracture was sought more often (68,2% vs. 52,1%), with a tendency towards increased use of combined osteosynthesis procedures (14.3% vs. 7.6%).
Conclusion We were able to show that as the number of cases increases, the insufficiency fracture becomes more important within FFP. If these patients tend to have more pronounced osteoporosis, particular attention should be paid to the diagnosis and adequate therapy of the osteoporosis, especially in the case of an insufficiency fracture. In addition to the increased diagnostic testing using MRI and DECT to detect oedema and the increased surgical therapy for this type of fracture, it is also noteworthy that the insufficiency fracture can cause higher-grade fractures after FFP.
Publication History
Article published online:
19 April 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References/Literatur
- 1 Oberkircher L, Ruchholtz S, Rommens PM. et al. Osteoporotic pelvic fractures. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018; 115: 70-80 doi:10.3238/arztebl.2018.0070
- 2 Holstein JH, Stuby FM, Herath SC. et al. Einfluss des Beckenregisters der DGU auf die Versorgung von Beckenringfrakturen. Unfallchirurg 2016; 119: 475-481 doi:10.1007/s00113-016-0168-2
- 3 Sullivan MP, Baldwin KD, Donegan DJ. et al. Geriatric Fractures About the Hip: Divergent Patterns in the Proximal Femur, Acetabulum, and Pelvis. Orthopedics 2014; 37: 151-157 doi:10.3928/01477447-20140225-50
- 4 Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: Recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury 2013; 44: 1733-1744 doi:10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.023
- 5 Grüneweller N, Fuchs T, Wähnert D. et al. Die augmentierte iliosakrale Schraube bei Beckenfrakturen im Alter. OP-Journal 2017; 33: 18-26
- 6 Culemann U, Scola A, Tosounidis G. et al. Versorgungskonzept der Beckenringverletzung des alten Patienten: Eine Herausforderung. Unfallchirurg 2010; 113: 258-271 doi:10.1007/s00113-010-1762-3
- 7 Stuby FM, Schäffler A, Haas T. et al. [Insufficiency fractures of the pelvic ring]. Unfallchirurg 2013; 116: 351-364 doi:10.1007/s00113-012-2349-y
- 8 Hackenbroch C, Riesner H-J, Lang P. et al. Dual Energy CT – a Novel Technique for Diagnostic Testing of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis. Z Orthop Unfall 2017; 155: 27-34 doi:10.1055/s-0042-110208
- 9 Cosker TDA, Ghandour A, Gupta SK. et al. Pelvic ramus fractures in the elderly. Acta Orthop 2009; 76: 513-516
- 10 Murthy NS. Imaging of stress fractures of the spine. Radiol Clin North Am 2012; 50: 799-821 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2012.04.009
- 11 Hackenbroch C, Riesner H-J, Lang P. et al. Dual Energy Computed Tomography in Musculoskeletal Imaging, with Focus on Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis. Z Orthop Unfall 2017; 155: 708-715 doi:10.1055/s-0043-117738
- 12 Palm H-G, Lang P, Sailer L. et al. Dual-energy CT as an innovative method for diagnosing fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: a retrospective comparison with MRI as the gold standard. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020; 140: 473-480 doi:10.1007/s00402-019-03283-8
- 13 Rommens PM, Arand C, Thomczyk S. et al. Fragilitätsfrakturen des Beckens. Unfallchirurg 2019; 122: 469-482 doi:10.1007/s00113-019-0643-7
- 14 Fuchs T, Rottbeck U, Hofbauer V. et al. Beckenringfrakturen im Alter. Die unterschätzte osteoporotische Fraktur. Unfallchirurg 2011; 114: 663-670 doi:10.1007/s00113-011-2020-z
- 15 Dodge G, Brison R. Low-impact pelvic fractures in the emergency department. CJEM 2010; 12: 509-513
- 16 Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Schwartz MC. et al. Pubic rami fracture: a benign pelvic injury?. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11: 7-9
- 17 Krappinger D, Struve P, Schmid R. et al. Fractures of the pubic rami: a retrospective review of 534 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129: 1685-1690
- 18 Tokumaru S, Toita T, Oguchi M. Insufficiency Fractures After Pelvic Radiation Therapy for Uterine Cervical Cancer: An Analysis of Subjects in a Prospective Multi-institutional Trial, and Cooperative Study of the Japan Radiation Oncology Group (JAROG) and Japanese Radiation Oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 84: e195-e200 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.042
- 19 Dreher R, Buttgereit F, Demary W. et al. Insuffizienzfrakturen in der Rheumatologie. Z Rheumatol 2006; 65: 417-423
- 20 Bogoch ER, Elliot-Gibson V, Wang RYC. et al. Secondary causes of osteoporosis in fracture patients. J Orthop Trauma 2012; 26: e145-e152
- 21 McCabe MP, Smyth MP, Richardson DR. Current concept reviews: vitamin D and stress fractures. Foot Ankle Int 2012; 33: 526-533
- 22 Chan K, Resnick D, Pathria M. et al. Pelvic instability after bone graft harvesting from posterior iliac crest: report of nine patients. Skeletal Radiol 2001; 30: 278-281
- 23 Papadopoulos EC, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP. Sacral fractures complicating thoracolumbar fusion to the sacrum. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33: E699-E707
- 24 Rollmann MF, Herath SC, Kirchhoff F. et al. Pelvic ring fractures in the elderly now and then – a pelvic registry study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2017; 71: 83-88 doi:10.1016/j.archger.2017.03.007
- 25 Cosker TDA, Ghandour A, Gupta SK. et al. Pelvic ramus fractures in the elderly: 50 Patients studied with MRI. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 513-516 doi:10.1080/17453670510044634
- 26 Böhme J, Höch A, Boldt A. et al. Einfluss der Standard-Computertomografie hinsichtlich Frakturklassifikation und Therapie von Beckenringfrakturen bei Patienten über dem 65. Lebensjahr. Z Orthop Unfall 2012; 150: 477-483 doi:10.1055/s-0032-1315270
- 27 Wagner D, Ossendorf C, Gruszka D. et al. Fragility fractures of the sacrum: how to identify and when to treat surgically?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2015; 41: 349-362 doi:10.1007/s00068-015-0530-z
- 28 Hackenbroch C, Lang P, Merz C. et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pelvic Fractures – Part 2: Gaining Information and Clinical Therapeutic Relevance. Z Orthop Unfall 2020; 158: 360-368 doi:10.1055/a-0965-7686
- 29 Lang P, Sterneder M, Riesner H. et al. Fragilitätsfrakturen des Beckenrings – führt der Ödemnachweis zu mehr Operationen?. Z Orthop Unfall 2020;
- 30 Schindler OS, Watura R, Cobby M. Sacral insufficiency fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2007; 15: 339-346
- 31 Mendel T, Ullrich BW, Hofmann GO. et al. Progressive instability of bilateral sacral fragility fractures in osteoporotic bone: a retrospective analysis of X-ray, CT, and MRI datasets from 78 cases. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2021; 47: 11-19 doi:10.1007/s00068-020-01480-4
- 32 Nüchtern JV, Hartel MJ, Henes FO. et al. Significance of clinical examination, CT and MRI scan in the diagnosis of posterior pelvic ring fractures. Injury 2015; 46: 315-319
- 33 Lang P, Merz C. Hackenbroch Cet al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pelvic Fractures – Part 1: Which Criteria Lead Us to Supplementary MRI Diagnostics?. Z Orthop Unfall 2020; 158: 351-359 doi:10.1055/a-0965-7589
- 34 Rommens PM, Arand C, Hopf C. et al. Progress of instability in fragility fractures of the pelvis: An observational study. Injury 2019; 50: 1966-1973 doi:10.1016/j.injury.2019.08.038
- 35 Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S. et al. Low-Trauma Pelvic Fractures in Elderly Finns in 1970–2013. Calcif Tissue Int 2015; 97: 577-580
- 36 Nanninga GL, de Leur K, Panneman MJM. et al. Increasing rates of pelvic fractures among older adults: The Netherlands, 1986–2011. Age Ageing 2014; 43: 648-653