Palladium-Catalyzed α-Arylation of Meyers’s Chiral Bicyclic Lactams and a Deprotonative Ring-Opening Sideline

Abstract

Described is a deprotonative α-arylation reaction of Meyers’s chiral bicyclic lactams (MCBLs) under palladium catalysis, and a substrate-dependent post-transformation. When the bridgehead carbon of the MCBLs is substituted with a methyl or an ethyl group, the initial arylation product undergoes a further rearrangement reaction to give a conjugated framework. On the other hand, substrates bearing a bridgehead isopropyl or aryl group are converted into the corresponding exo-arylation products. Preliminary studies indicated that the rearrangement pathway was promoted by deprotonation and was independent of palladium catalysis. In addition to mechanistic interests, this study demonstrates a modular and divergent synthesis of functionalized lactams.

Key words

arylation - palladium catalysis - enolates - rearrangement - stereoselectivity - lactams

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 27. November 2023

Angenommen nach Revision: 31. Januar 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
31. Januar 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. Februar 2024

• References and Notes

• 1a Sivanandan ST, Shaji A, Ibnusaud I, Johansson Seechurn CC. C, Colacot TJ. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 38
• 1b Potukuchi HK, Spork AP, Donohoe TJ. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015; 13: 4367
• 2a Hao Y.-J, Hu X.-S, Zhou Y, Zhou J, Yu J.-S. ACS Catal. 2020; 10: 955
• 2b Li S, Wei J, Ren Q, Yue G, Qiu D, Fagnoni M, Protti S. ChemCatChem 2023; 15: e202201555
• 3a Satoh T, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Nomura M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997; 36: 1740
• 3b Palucki M, Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 11108
• 3c Hamann BC, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 12382
• 4a Bellina F, Rossi R. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 1082
• 4b Novák P, Martín R. Curr. Org. Chem. 2011; 15: 3233
• 4c Wang M, Wang W, Li D, Wang W.-J, Zhan R, Shao L.-D. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2021; 11: 379
• 5a Hou W.-Y, Wu Y.-K. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 1220
• 5b Yang Y.-C, Lin Y.-C, Wu Y.-K. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 9286
• 5c Chang Y.-H, Peng W.-L, Chen I.-C, Hsu H.-Y, Wu Y.-K. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 4660
• 5d Lin Y.-C, Yen K.-W, Lin H.-J, Yang Y.-C, Wu Y.-K. Chem. Commun. 2021; 57: 12119
• 6a Meyers AI, Harre M, Garland R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984; 106: 1146
• 6b Meyers AI, Wanner KT. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985; 26: 2047
• 6c Meyers AI, Lefker BA, Wanner KT, Aitken RA. J. Org. Chem. 1986; 51: 1936
• 6d Meyers AI, Brengel GP. Chem. Commun. 1997; 1
• 6e Romo D, Meyers AI. Tetrahedron 1991; 47: 9503
• 6f Trauner D, Danishefsky SJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999; 40: 6513
• 6g Kopach ME, Fray AH, Meyers AI. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996; 118: 9876
• 7a Meyers AI, Hanreich R, Wanner KT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985; 107: 7776
• 7b Meyers AI, Lefker BA. J. Org. Chem. 1986; 51: 1541
• 7c Meyers AI, Schwarz JB. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 6511
• 7d Degnan AP, Meyers AI. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999; 121: 2762
• 7e Kuwahara S, Saito M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 5047
• 8a He Z.-T, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 11749
• 8b Cossy J, de Filippis A, Pardo DG. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 3037
• 9a Williard PG, Hintze MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990; 112: 8602
• 9b Reich HJ. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 7130
• 10a Chen L, Ren P, Carrow BP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 6392
• 10b Carrow BP, Chen L. Synlett 2017; 28: 280
• 11a Munchhof MJ, Meyers AI. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 7084
• 11b Groaning MD, Meyers AI. Chem. Commun. 2000; 1027
• 12 1-[(1S)-1-(Hydroxymethyl)-2-methylpropyl]-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-methyl-1,5-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-2-one (3a) A 0.71 M solution of LiHMDS was prepared prior to use by adding a 2.5 M solution of BuLi in hexanes (2 mmol, 0.8 mL) to freshly distilled (TMS)₂NH (2 mmol, 0.42 mL) in THF (2 mL) at 0 °C and then stirring for 15 min. A 0.71 M solution of LDA was also prepared prior to use by adding a 2.5 M solution of BuLi in hexanes (4 mmol, 1.6 mL) to freshly distilled i-Pr₂NH (4 mmol, 0.56 mL) in THF (4 mL) at 0 °C and then stirring for 15 min. A round-bottomed flask was charged with the Meyers lactam 1a (1.0 mmol, 183 mg) and toluene (5.0 mL). The solutions of LiHMDS (1 equiv, 1.41 mL) and LDA (2.0 equiv, 2.82 mL) were added sequentially to the reaction flask at –78 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 2 h. The resulting mixture was transferred to a round-bottomed flask containing 4-bromoanisole (1.2 equiv, 1.2 mmol, 224 mg), Pd(OAc)₂ (5 mol%, 11 mg), and PAd₃ (6 mol%, 26 mg) at –78 °C. The cooling bath was removed, and the resulting mixture was stirred at r.t. for 1 h until the reaction was complete (TLC). The reaction was then quenched with aq NH₄Cl and the mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite. The filtrate was diluted with EtOAc and extracted sequentially with H₂O and brine. The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by flash column chromatography [silica gel, hexanes–EtOAc (2:1)] to give a yellow oil; yield: 142 mg (49%); R_f = 0.33 (hexanes–EtOAc, 2:1). IR (film): 3354, 3012, 2967, 2933, 2914, 2874 cm^–1. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.81 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.99 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 5.09 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.12 (qd, J = 6.9, 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.04 (br s, 1 H), 3.85–3.81 (m, 4 H), 2.96 (ddd, J = 9.7, 4.8, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.84–2.70 (m, 1 H), 1.32 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 1.05 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H), 0.86 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 171.54, 141.37, 138.72, 135.87, 129.24, 128.59, 127.09, 64.41, 64.33, 59.44, 26.18, 21.44, 20.48, 20.15, 17.22. HRMS (EI): m/z [M]⁺ calcd for C₁₇H₂₃NO₃: 289.1672; found: 289.1664.
• 13 CCDC 2309298 and 2308874 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compounds 2f and 3b, respectively. The data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures
• 14 Exo- and endo-2a were prepared in four steps from methyl (4-methoxyphenyl)acetate; see the Supporting Information for more details.
• 15a Jin S.-J, Arora PK, Sayre LM. J. Org. Chem. 1990; 55: 3011
• 15b Chou H.-H, Wu H.-M, Wu J.-D, Ly TW, Jan N.-W, Shia K.-S, Liu H.-J. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 121