PDF herunterladen
Synlett 2009(8): 1277-1280  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1088132
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Palladium-Catalyzed Reaction of Arenediazonium Tetrafluoroborates with Methyl 4-Hydroxy-2-butenoate: An Approach to 4-Aryl Butenolides and an Expeditious Synthesis of Rubrolide E

Sandro Cacchi*, Giancarlo Fabrizi, Antonella Goggiamani, Alessio Sferrazza
Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie del Farmaco, Università degli Studi ‘La Sapienza’, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
Fax: +39(06)49912780; e-Mail: sandro.cacchi@uniroma1.it;
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 10 February 2009
Publikationsdatum:
08. April 2009 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Abstract

The palladium-catalyzed reaction of arenediazonium ­tetrafluoroborates with methyl 4-hydroxy-2-butenoate in MeOH under mild conditions gives 4-arylbutenolides usually in good to high yields through a domino vinylic substitution/cyclization process. The reaction tolerates a variety of useful substituents including the whole range of halogen substituents, nitro, ether, cyano, keto, and ester groups and can be performed as a one-pot process generating the arenediazonium salt in situ. By using this method, the marine antibiotic rubrolide E has been synthesized via an expeditious and efficient sequential protocol that omits the isolation of the butenolide intermediate (two operative steps, 52% overall yield).

Key words

diazonium salts - Heck reaction - cyclization - buten­olides - rubrolides

    References and Notes

  • 1 For an excellent recent review on the palladium chemistry of arenediazonium salts, see: Roglans A. Pla-Quintana A. Moreno-Mañas M. Chem. Rev.  2006,  106:  4622 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • For some recent selected references, see:
  • 2a Brunner H. Le Cousturier de Courcy N. Genêt J.-P. Synlett  2000,  201 
    Google Scholar
  • 2b Cai MZ. Hu RH. Zhou J. Chin. Chem. Lett.  2001,  12:  861 
    Google Scholar
  • 2c Hu R.-H. Liu X.-L. Cai M.-Z. Jiangxi Shifan Daxue Xuebao, Ziran Kexueban  2001,  25:  246 ; Chem. Abstr. 2001, 136, 355024
    Google Scholar
  • 2d Darses S. Pucheault M. Genêt J.-P. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2001,  1121 
    Google Scholar
  • 2e Sengupta S. Bhattacharyya S. Tetrahedron Lett.  2001,  42:  2035 
    Google Scholar
  • 2f Andrus MB. Song C. Zhang J. Org. Lett.  2002,  4:  2079 
    Google Scholar
  • 2g Selvakumar K. Zapf A. Spannenberg A. Beller M. Chem. Eur. J.  2002,  8:  3901 
    Google Scholar
  • 2h Andrus MB. Ma Y. Zang Y. Song C. Tetrahedron Lett.  2002,  43:  9137 
    Google Scholar
  • 2i Ma Y. Song C. Chai Q. Ma C. Andrus MB. Synthesis  2003,  2886 
    Google Scholar
  • 2j Wang C. Tan L.-S. He J.-P. Hu H.-W. Xu J.-H. Synth. Commun.  2003,  33:  773 
    Google Scholar
  • 2k Masllorens J. Moreno-Mañas M. Pla-Quintana A. Roglans A. Org. Lett.  2003,  5:  1559 
    Google Scholar
  • 2l Schmidt B. Chem. Commun.  2003,  1656 
    Google Scholar
  • 2m Nelson ML. Ismail MY. McIntyre L. Bhatia B. Viski P. Hawkins P. Rennie G. Andorsky D. Messersmith D. Stapleton K. Dumornay J. Sheahan P. Verma AK. Warchol T. Levy SB. J. Org. Chem.  2003,  68:  5838 
    Google Scholar
  • 2n Dai M. Liang B. Wang C. Chen J. Yang Z. Org. Lett.  2004,  6:  221 
    Google Scholar
  • 2o Kabalka GW. Dong G. Venkataiah B. Tetrahedron Lett.  2004,  45:  2775 
    Google Scholar
  • 2p Xu L.-H. Zhang Y.-Y. Wang X.-L. Chou J.-Y. Dyes Pigm.  2004,  62:  283 
    Google Scholar
  • 2q Masllorens J. Bouquillon S. Roglans A. Hénin F. Muzart J. J. Organomet. Chem.  2005,  690:  3822 
    Google Scholar
  • 2r Farina A. Ferranti C. Marra C. Guiso M. Norcia G. Nat. Prod. Res.  2007,  21:  564 
    Google Scholar
  • 2s Moro AV. Cardoso FSP. Correia CRD. Tetrahedron Lett.  2008,  49:  5668 
    Google Scholar
  • For some recent references, see:
  • 3a Severino EA. Costenaro ER. Garcia ALL. Correia CRD. Org. Lett.  2003,  5:  305 
    Google Scholar
  • 3b Garcia ALL. Correia CRD. Tetrahedron Lett.  2003,  44:  1553 
    Google Scholar
  • 3c Montes de Oca ACB. Correia CRD. ARKIVOC  2003,  (x):  390 
    Google Scholar
  • 3d Schmidt B. Chem. Commun.  2003,  1656 
    Google Scholar
  • 3e Garcia Ariel LL. Carpes MJS. Montes de Oca ACB. dos Santos MAG. Santana CC. Correia CRD. J. Org. Chem.  2005,  70:  1050 
    Google Scholar
  • 3f Sabino AA. Machado AHL. Correia CRD. Eberlin MN. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2004,  43:  2514 
    Google Scholar
  • 3g Sabino AA. Machado AHL. Correia CRD. Eberlin MN. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2004,  43:  4389 
    Google Scholar
  • 3h Pastre JC. Correia CRD. Org. Lett.  2006,  8:  1657 
    Google Scholar
  • 3i Burtoloso ACB. Garcia ALL. Miranda KC. Correia CRD. Synlett  2006,  3145 
    Google Scholar
  • 3j Artuso E. Barbero M. Degani I. Dughera S. Fochi R. Tetrahedron  2006,  62:  3146 
    Google Scholar
  • 3k Meira PRR. Moro AV. Correia CRD. Synthesis  2007,  2279 
    Google Scholar
  • 3l Peixoto da Silva K. Godoi MN. Correia CRD. Org. Lett.  2007,  9:  2815 
    Google Scholar
  • 3m Barreto R. Nascimbem LBLR. Correia CRD. Synth. Commun.  2007,  37:  2011 
    Google Scholar
  • 3n Bartoli G. Cacchi S. Fabrizi G. Goggiamani A. Synlett  2008,  2508 
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Perez R. Veronese D. Coelho F. Antunes OAC. Tetrahedron Lett.  2006,  47:  1325 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Konno T. Yamada S. Tani A. Miyabe T. Ishihara T. Synlett  2006,  3025 
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cacchi S. Fabrizi G. Goggiamani A. Persiani D. Org. Lett.  2008,  10:  1597 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Ethyl and methyl 4-hydroxy-2-butenoates were prepared according to literature procedures:
  • 7a Rambaud R. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr.  1934,  1:  1317 
    Google Scholar
  • 7b Hassner A. Friedman O. Dehaen W. Liebigs Ann./ Recl.  1997,  587 
    Google Scholar
  • 8a Bezuidenhoudt BCB. Swanepoel A. Brandt EV. Ferreira D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  1990,  2599 
    Google Scholar
  • 8b Miao S. Andersen RJ. J. Org. Chem.  1991,  56:  6275 
    Google Scholar
  • 8c Miles DH. Chittawong V. Lho D.-S. Payne AM. de la Cruz AA. Gomez ED. Weeks JA. Atwood JL. J. Nat. Prod.  1991,  54:  286 
    Google Scholar
  • 8d Nohara T. Kinjo J. Furusawa J. Sakai Y. Inoue M. Shirataki Y. Ishibashi Y. Yokoe I. Komatsu M. Phytochemistry  1993,  33:  1207 
    Google Scholar
  • 8e Cerri A. Mauri P. Mauro M. Melloni P. J. Heterocycl. Chem.  1993,  30:  1581 
    Google Scholar
  • 8f Tan L. Chen C.-y. Larsen RD. Verhoeven TR. Reider PJ. Tetrahedron Lett.  1998,  39:  3961 
    Google Scholar
  • 8g Smith CJ. Hettich RL. Jompa J. Tahir A. Buchanan MV. Ireland CM. J. Org. Chem.  1998,  63:  4147 
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Miao S. Andersen RJ. J. Org. Chem.  1991,  56:  6275 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ortega MJ. Zubia E. Ocana JM. Naranjo S. Salva J. Tetrahedron  2000,  56:  3963 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • For selected recent syntheses of rubrolides, see:
  • 12a Bellina F. Anselmi C. Stephane V. Mannina L. Rossi R. Tetrahedron  2001,  57:  9997 
    Google Scholar
  • 12b Bellina F. Anselmi C. Rossi R. Tetrahedron Lett.  2002,  43:  2023 
    Google Scholar
  • 12c Bellina F. Anselmi C. Manina F. Rossi R. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2003,  2290 
    Google Scholar
  • 12d Boukouvalas J. Pouliot M. Synlett  2005,  343 
    Google Scholar
  • 12e Kar A. Argade NP. Synlett  2005,  2284 
    Google Scholar
  • 12f Chavan SP. Pathak AB. Pandey A. Kalkote UR. Synth. Commun.  2007,  37:  4253 
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Doyle MP. Bryker WJ. J. Org. Chem.  1979,  44:  1572 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
9

Typical Procedure for the Preparation of Butenolides (3) To a stirred solution of 2b (58.0 mg, 0.50 mmol) and Pd(OAc)2 (5.6 mg, 0.025 mmol) in anhyd MeOH (5.0 mL), 1b (250.0 mg, 1.0 mmol) was added at r.t. under argon. The reaction mixture was warmed at 40 ˚C and stirred at that temperature for 4 h (the reactor was protected from light with aluminum film). After cooling, the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc, washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 [n-hexane-EtOAc, 60:40] to afford 83.9 mg of 3b (77% yield); mp: 192-194 ˚C. IR (KBr): 1745, 1710, 1280 cm-¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.15 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 6.21 (t, J = 1.6 Hz, 2 H), 5.16 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 2 H), 3.97 (s, 3 H). ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.2, 166.0, 162.5, 133.6, 132.9, 130.5, 126.5, 115.3, 70.9, 52.6. MS: m/z (%) = 216 (8) [M+], 75 (42), 59 (100).

14

One-Pot Procedure for the Preparation of Butenolides (3) from Anilines
A solution of BF3˙OEt2 (140 µL, 1.1 mmol) in anhyd THF (1 mL) was cooled at -15 ˚C, and 4-carbomethoxylaniline (151.2 mg, 1 mmol) was added. Then, tert-butyl nitrite (160 µL, 1.3 mmol) in 1 mL of the same solvent was added dropwise to the rapidly stirred solution over a 10 min period. After that, the reaction temperature was maintained at -15 ˚C for 10 min, allowed to warm to 5 ˚C (ice-water bath) over a 20 min period, warmed to r.t., and stirred at the same temperature till the disappearance of the starting aniline. The reaction mixture was subsequently concentrated under reduced pressure and diluted with anhyd MeOH (5 mL). Then, 2b (58.0 mg, 0.50 mmol) and Pd(OAc)2 (5.6 mg, 0.025 mmol) were added, the reaction mixture was warmed at 40 ˚C, and stirred at that temperature for 4 h (the reactor was protected from light with aluminum film). After cooling, the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc, washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by chromatography on SiO2 [n-hexane-EtOAc, 60:40] to afford 80.0 mg of 3b (73% yield).