RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1219354
An Organocatalytic Approach to Enantiopure 2,6-Disubstituted Tetrahydropyranols
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
26. Januar 2010 (online)
Abstract
A method is described for the synthesis of cis-2,6-disubstituted tetrahydropyranols related to ring A of ambruticin S. An organocatalytic and metal-free aldol condensation was utilized as a key step between appropriate carbonyl-containing precursors resulting in high diastereoselection and 24% overall yield for seven steps.
Key words
organocatalysis - tetrahydropyranol - aldol reaction - ambruticin S - Michael-type cyclization
- 1 For example, see:
Faul MM.Huff BE. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100: 2407 - For selected reviews, see:
-
2a
Clarke PA.Santos S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 2045 -
2b
Muzart J. Tetrahedron 2005, 6: 5955 -
2c
Boivin TLB. Tetrahedron 1987, 43: 3309 - 3
Hanessian S. Total Synthesis of Natural Products. The Chiron Approach Pergamon Press; New York: 1983. - For selected reviews of the hetero Diels-Alder reaction, see:
-
4a
Jørgensen KA. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 10: 2093 -
4b
Tietze LF.Kettschau G.Gewert JA.Schuffenhauer A. Curr. Org. Chem. 1998, 2: 19 -
4c
Tietze LF.Kettschau G. Top. Curr. Chem. 1997, 189: 1 - For selected reviews, see:
-
5a
Pellissier H. Tetrahedron 2009, 65: 2839 -
5b
Lin LL.Liu XH.Feng XM. Synlett 2007, 2147 -
5c
Osborn HMI.Coisson D. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem. 2004, 1: 41 -
5d
Jørgensen KA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39: 3558 -
5e
Waldmann H. Synthesis 1994, 535 - For an authoritative monograph, see:
-
6a
Berkessel A.Gröger H. In Asymmetric Organocatalysis Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2005. - For pertinent recent reviews and articles, see:
-
6b
Dondoni A.Massia A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47: 4638 -
6c
Melchiorre P.Marigo M.Carlone A.Bartoli G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47: 6138 -
6d
Enders D.Niemeier O.Henseler A. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107: 5606 -
6e
Pellissier H. Tetrahedron 2007, 63: 9267 -
6f
Dalko PI.Moisan L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43: 5138 -
6g
Dalko PI.Moisan L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40: 3726 -
6h For a thematic issue on
organocatalysis, see: Chem. Rev.
2007,
107:
5413-5883
-
7a
Northrup AB.MacMillan DWC. Science 2004, 305: 1752 -
7b
Northrup AB.Mangion IK.Hettche F.MacMillan DWC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43: 2152 -
8a
Grondal C.Enders D. Tetrahedron 2006, 62: 329 -
8b
Enders D.Grondal C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44: 1210 -
9a
Zhao G.-L.Liao W.-W.Córdova A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 4929 -
9b
Casas J.Engqvist M.Ibrahem I.Kaynak B.Córdova A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44: 1343 -
9c
Córdova A.Ibrahem I.Casas J.Sundén H.Engqvist M.Reyes E. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11: 4772 - 10
Suri JT.Ramachary DB.Barbas CF. Org. Lett. 2005, 7: 1383 -
11a
Connor DT.von Strandtmann M. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43: 4606 -
11b
Connor DT.Greenough RC.von Strandtmann M. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42: 3664 -
11c For a review of the biology
and chemistry, see:
Williams DR.Li JJ.Hutchings RH. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2000, 32: 409 -
11d See also:
Michelet V.Genêt J.-P. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005, 9: 405 -
12a
Bonini C.Chiummiento L.Videtta V.Colobert F.Solladié G. Synlett 2006, 2427 -
12b
Crimmins MT.Siliphaivanh P. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 4641 -
13a
Berberich SM.Cherney RJ.Colucci J.Courillon C.Geranci LS.Kirkland TA.Marx MA.Schneider MF.Martin SF. Tetrahedron 2003, 59: 6819 -
13b
Kirkland TA.Colucci J.Geraci LS.Marx MA.Schneider M.Kaelin DE.Martin SF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123: 12432 -
13c
Michelet V.Adiey K.Bulic B.Genêt J.-P.Dujardin G.Rossignol S.Brown E.Toupet L. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 2885 -
13d
Liu L.Donaldson WA. Synlett 1996, 103 -
13e
Just G.Potvin P. Can. J. Chem. 1980, 58: 2173 -
13f See also:
Betancort JM.Martín VS.Padrón JM.Palazón JM.Ramírez MA.Soler MA. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62: 4570 -
14a
Niewczas I.Majewski M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 33 -
14b
Calderón F.Doyagüez EG.Cheong PH.-Y.Fernández-Mayoralas A.Houk KN. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73: 7916 -
14c
Enders D.Narine AA. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73: 7857 -
14d
Doyagüez EG.Calderón F.Sánchez F.Fernández-Mayoralas A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72: 9353 -
14e
Palyam N.Niewczas I.Majewski M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 9195 -
14f
Suri JT.Mitsumori S.Albertshofer K.Tanaka F.Barbas CF. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71: 3822 -
14g
Enders D.Palecek J.Grondal C. Chem. Commun. 2006, 655 -
14h
Majewski M.Niewczas I.Palyam N. Synlett 2006, 2387 -
14i
Enders D.Voith M.Lenzen A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44: 1304 ; and references cited therein -
14j For a review, see:
Enders D.Voith M.Lanzen A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44: 1304 -
15a
Kende AS.Mendoza JS.Fujii Y. Tetrahedron 1993, 49: 8015 -
15b
Kende AS.Fujii Y.Mendoza JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112: 9645 - 16
Lee E.Choi SJ.Kim H.Han HO.Kim YY.Min SJ.Son SH.Lim SM.Jang WS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41: 176 - 17
Sándrez MEL.Michelet V.Besnier I.Genêt J.-P. Synlett 1994, 705 - 18
Barnes NJ.Davidson AH.Hughes LR.Procter G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 1292 - 19
Liu P.Jacobsen EN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123: 10772 - 20
Michelet V.Adiey K.Tanier S.Dujardin G.Genêt J.-P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 2947
References and Notes
Procedure for
the
d
-Proline-Catalyzed Aldol Product 3
A
solution of 2 (349 mg, 2.0 mmol) in DMF
solution (2.0 mL) was added slowly over the course of 18 h to a
stirring suspension of 1 (1.63 g, 6.0 mmol), d-proline (69 mg, 0.6 mmol) in DMF solution
(3.0 mL) at 4 ˚C. After stirring at 4 ˚C for 18
h, the resulting solution was diluted with Et2O (25 mL)
and washed successively with H2O (15 mL) and brine (15
mL). The combined aqueous layers were then re-extracted with 3 portions
of CH2Cl2 (20 mL). The organic layers were
then combined, dried over Na2SO4, concen-trated,
and purified with flash column chromatography (silica gel, EtOAc-hexanes = 1:4)
to afford the desired aldol product 3 as
a colorless oil (134 mg, 15%).
¹H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.65 (d, J = 1.2 Hz,
1 H), 7.02 (dt, J = 15.6,
7.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.91 (d, J = 15.6
Hz, 1 H), 4.15 (dd, J = 4.8,
1.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.03 (dd, J = 10.8,
5.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.80 (dt, J = 6.4,
4.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.74 (s, 3 H), 2.66-2.59 (m, 1 H), 2.51-2.43
(m, 1 H), 0.94 (s, 9 H), 0.90 (s, 9 H), 0.13 (s, 6 H), 0.10 (s,
6 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 201.20,
166.26, 144.64, 123.28, 77.69, 75.59, 69.97, 51.10, 34.84, 25.45,
25.39, 17.84, 17.64, -4.62, -4.85, -4.89,
-5.39.
ESI-MS: m/z calcd for C21H43O6Si2 [M + H]+:
446.3; found: 446.3.
Procedure for
the
d
-Proline-Catalyzed Aldol Product 7
To
a solution of d-proline (35 mg, 0.30 mmol)
in DMF (2 mL) were added 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-5-one (6, 650 mg, 5.0 mmol) and aldehyde 1 (272 mg, 1.0 mmol), and the resulting
reaction mixture was stirred at 4 ˚C for 3 d. Then sat.
NH4Cl solution (2 mL) and Et2O (5 mL) were
added with vigorous stirring and the layers separated. The organic
phase was combined, washed with brine (4 mL), dried over Na2SO4,
concentrated, and purified with flash column chromatography (silica
gel, EtOAc-hexanes = 1:4) to afford the desired
aldol product 7 as a colorless oil (242
mg, 60%).
¹H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): δ = 6.94 (dt, J = 15.6,
7.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.92 (d, J = 15.6
Hz, 1 H), 4.30 (ABq, J = 17.2
Hz, 1 H), 4.13 (m, 1 H), 4.09 (ABq, J = 17.2
Hz, 1 H), 3.77 (m, 1 H), 3.74 (s, 3 H), 3.06 (d, J = 9.6
Hz, 1 H), 2.66 (ddt, J = 15.2,
7.6, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.42 (ddt, J = 14.8,
7.6, 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 1.49 (s, 3 H), 1.46 (s, 3 H), 0.92 (s, 9 H),
0.12 (d, J = 1.6 Hz,
6 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 209.39,
166.31, 144.26, 123.23, 100.40, 73.66, 71.50, 69.62, 66.66, 51.14, 36.57,
25.54, 24.24, 23.43, 17.80. [α]D
²0 +80.6
(c 2.2, CHCl3). ESI-MS: m/z calcd for C19H35O7Si [M + H]+:
403.2; found: 403.2.
Procedure for 8 To a solution of 7 (350 mg, 0.87 mmol) in MeOH (9 mL) was added NaBH4 (66 mg, 1.74 mmol) at -20 ˚C. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred at -20 ˚C for 2 h until TLC showed consumption of starting material, followed by treatment of ice water. The aqueous layer was then extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The organic phase was combined, dried over MgSO4, concentrated, and purified with flash column chromatography (silica gel, EtOAc-hexanes = 1:2) to afford 8 as a colorless oil (211 mg, 80%). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.93 (dt, J = 15.6, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.92 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.11 (dd, J = 8.0, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.92 (dd, J = 11.2, 5.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.79 (m, 1 H), 3.76 (s, 3 H), 3.74 (m, 1 H), 3.64 (dd, J = 11.2, 9.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.46 (m, 1 H), 2.58 (ddt, J = 15.2, 7.6, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.43 (m, 1 H), 1.48 (s, 3 H), 1.38 (s, 3 H), 0.94 (s, 9 H), 0.15 (s, 6 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.25, 143.62, 123.28, 98.12, 76.44, 71.20, 67.90, 67.10, 62.95, 51.16, 37.03, 28.44, 25.46, 19.26, 17.87, -4.32, -4.96. [α]D ²0 +10.6 (c 2.0 in CHCl3). ESI-MS: m/z calcd for C19H38O7Si [M + H]+: 405.2; found: 405.2.
24
Procedure for
9
A solution of H2SO4 (0.1 M
in MeOH, 0.68 mL) was added to a solution of 8 (138
mg, 0.34 mmol) in anhyd MeOH (3.4 mL), and this reaction mixture
was heated under reflux for 3 h. The reaction was cooled to r.t.
and the solvent removed in vacuo. The resultant residue was redissolved
in MeOH (3.4 mL) and the solution heated under reflux for 3 h. This process
was repeated for 3 times, then stirred overnight at r.t., at which
time NaOMe (0.5 M in MeOH, 0.96 mL) was added. The mixture was heated
under reflux for an additional 24 h. The solution was then cooled
to r.t. and H2SO4 (0.1 M in MeOH) was added
until the solution was strongly acidic (pH ca. 1). The solution
was stirred for 2 h at r.t., and sat. aq NaHCO3 was added
until the mixture was neutral. The insoluble salts were removed
by filtration, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure.
The resulting oil was purified by flash chromatography (silica gel,
MeOH-EtOAc = 1:10) to provide compound 9 as a white solid
(58 mg, 68%).
¹H
NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 3.89-3.84
(m, 2 H), 3.73-3.70 (m, 2 H), 3.69 (s, 3 H), 3.64-3.56
(m, 2 H), 3.24 (dd, J = 9.6,
4.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.55 (d, J = 3.2
Hz, 1 H), 2.53 (d, J = 1.6
Hz, 1 H), 2.02 (ddd, J = 12.8,
5.6, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.36 (q, J = 12.8
Hz, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 171.48,
78.92, 73.16, 71.85, 71.70, 62.33, 50.44, 39.43, 38.01. [α]D
²0 -6.89
(c 2.8, MeOH). ESI-MS: m/z calcd
for C10H19O7 [M + H]+:
251.1; found: 251.1.
Procedure for
5
To a solution of 9 (50
mg, 0.2 mmol) in THF and H2O (3 mL, v/v 2:1)
was added NaIO4 (51 mg, 0.24 mmol) at 0 ˚C,
and the resulting solution was stirred for 15 min at 0 ˚C,
followed by addition of EtOAc. The solution was filtered through
a Celite pad and washed with EtOAc. The EtOAc filtrate was then
washed with sat. Na2S2O3 (3 mL),
dried over MgSO4, and concentrated under vacuum. The
crude aldehyde was then dissolved in MeOH (2 mL), to which NaBH4 (30
mg, 0.8 mmol) was added in one portion at 0 ˚C. The resulting solution
was then stirred at 0 ˚C for 30 min, followed by treatment
of ice water. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 5
mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under
vacuum. The crude triol was then purified with flash column chromatography
(silica gel, MeOH-EtOAc = 1:9) to provide 5
¹³e as a
white solid (32 mg, 72%).
¹H
NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 3.92-3.81
(m, 2 H), 3.69 (s, 3 H), 3.59-3.55 (m, 2 H), 3.20 (d, J = 1.6 Hz,
1 H), 2.61 (dd, J = 15.6,
7.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.51 (dd, J = 15.6,
5.6 Hz, 1 H), 2.04 (ddd, J = 12.8,
5.2, 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.36 (q, J = 12.8
Hz, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 176.33,
82.77, 73.16, 72.63, 71.04, 62.98, 52.80, 41.85, 39.77. ESI-MS: m/z calcd for C9H17O6 [M + H]+:
220.1; found: 220.1.