Iron-Promoted Decarboxylation of Arylacetic Acids for the Synthesis of Aromatic Nitriles with Sodium Nitrite as the Nitrogen Source

Abstract

A new and effective method was developed for the synthesis of aromatic nitriles from arylacetic acids by using NaNO₂ as the nitrogen source and Fe(OTf)₃ as the promoter at 50 °C. A series of arylacetic acids underwent this transformation to give the targeted products in yields of 51–90%. Because of the mild conditions, the reaction is compatible with a broad range of functional groups, including ester, carboxy, hydroxy, acetamido, halo, nitro, cyano, methoxy, and even highly reactive formyl groups.

Key words

aryl nitriles - nitriles - decarboxylation - sodium nitrite - iron catalysis - arylacetic acids

• References and Notes

• 1a Zhao L, Dong Y, Xia Q, Bai J, Li Y. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 6471
• 1b Xu S, Teng J, Yu J.-T, Sun S, Cheng J. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 9919
• 1c Wang Z, Wang X, Ura Y, Nishihara Y. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 6779
• 1d Liu L.-Y, Yeung K.-S, Yu J.-Q. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 2199
• 1e Bhagat SB, Telvekar VN. Synlett 2018; 29: 874
• 1f Gao G, Sun P, Li Y, Wang F, Zhao Z, Qin Y, Li F. ACS Catal. 2017; 7: 4927
• 1g Li J, Liu G, Long X, Gao G, Wu J, Li F. J. Catal. 2017; 355: 53
• 2a Hosseinian A, Ahmadi S, Monfared A, Nezhad PD. K, Vessally E. Curr. Org. Chem. 2018; 22: 1862
• 2b Chaitanya M, Anbarasan P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018; 16: 7084
• 2c Jereb M, Hribernik L. Green Chem. 2017; 19: 2286
• 2d Ghodse SM, Takale BS, Hatvate NT, Telvekar VN. ChemistrySelect 2018; 3: 4168
• 2e Yabe O, Mizufune H, Ikemoto T. Synlett 2009; 1291
• 3 Li J, Xu W, Ding J, Lee K.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 1205
• 4a Shee M, Shah SS, Singh ND. P. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 4240
• 4b Niknam E, Panahi F, Khalafi-Nezhad A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 2020: 2699
• 4c Chen H, Sun S, Liu YA, Liao X. ACS Catal. 2020; 10: 1397
• 4d Mills LR, Graham JM, Patel P, Rousseaux SA. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019; 141: 19257
• 5a Nandi J, Leadbeater NE. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019; 17: 9182
• 5b Fang W.-Y, Qin H.-L. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 5803
• 5c Gurjar J, Bater J, Fokin VV. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 1906
• 6a Olivares M, Knörr P, Albrecht M. Dalton Trans. 2020; 49: 1981
• 6b Das HS, Das S, Dey K, Singh B, Haridasan RK, Das A, Ahmed J, Mandal SK. Chem. Commun. 2019; 55: 11868
• 6c Lu G.-P, Li X, Zhong L, Li S, Chen F. Green Chem. 2019; 21: 5386
• 6d Achard T, Egly J, Sigrist M, Maisse-François A, Bellemin-Laponnaz S. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 13271
• 7a Zhang W, Lin J.-H, Zhang P, Xiao J.-C. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 6221
• 7b Zhao Y, Mei G, Wang H, Zhang G, Ding C. Synlett 2019; 30: 1484
• 7c Ding R, Liu Y, Han M, Jiao W, Li J, Tian H, Sun B. J. Org. Chem. 2018; 83: 12939
• 8a Liu M, You E, Cao W, Shi J. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2019; 8: 1850
• 8b Chen H, Mondal A, Wedi P, van Gemmeren M. ACS Catal. 2019; 9: 1979
• 8c Hayrapetyan D, Rit RK, Kratz M, Tschulik K, Gooßen LJ. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 11288
• 9a Liu J, Zhang C, Zhang Z, Wen X, Dou X, Wei J, Qiu X, Song S, Jiao N. Science 2020; 367: 281
• 9b Wang Y, Zhang H, Xie S, Sun H, Li X, Fuhr O, Fenske D. Organometallics 2020; 39: 824
• 9c Hota PK, Maji S, Ahmed J, Rajendran NM, Mandal SK. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 575
• 10 Lamani M, Prabhu KR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 6622
• 11a Gu L, Jin C, Zhang H, Liu J, Li G, Yang Z. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016; 14: 6687
• 11b Xu B, Jiang Q, Zhao A, Jia J, Liu Q, Luo W, Guo C. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 11264
• 12 Cui J, Song J, Liu Q, Liu H, Dong Y. Chem. Asian J. 2018; 13: 482
• 13a Patil BN, Lade JJ, Karpe AS, Pownthurai B, Vadagaonkar KS, Mohanasrinivasan V, Chaskar AC. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019; 60: 891
• 13b Hussain FH, Suria M, Namdeo A, Borah G, Dutta D, Goswami T, Paharia P. Catal. Commun. 2019; 124: 76
• 13c Hatvate NT, Takale BS, Ghodse SM, Telvekar VN. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018; 59: 3892
• 13d Fang J, Wang D, Deng G.-J, Gong H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017; 58: 4503
• 13e Wang D, Fang J, Deng G.-J, Gong H. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017; 5: 6398
• 14 Feng Q, Song Q. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014; 356: 1697
• 15 Kangani CO, Day BW, Kelley DE. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008; 49: 914
• 16 Nitriles 2a–r: General Procedure A tube of approximate volume 45 mL was charged with the appropriate arylacetic acid (0.5 mmol), NaNO₂ (3 mmol), Fe(OTf)₃ (1 mmol), and undried DMSO (2 mL), and the air in the tube was replaced by argon gas. The tube was sealed and the mixture was heated with magnetic stirring at 50 °C for 10 h, then cooled to r.t. The solvent was evaporated, and the residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel). Biphenyl-4-carbonitrile (2a)^11b White solid; yield: 77.1 mg (86%); m.p. 84–86°C. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.76 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.61–7.63 (m, 2 H), 7.50–7.53 (m, 2 H), 7.44–7.48 (m, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 145.7, 139.2, 132.6, 129.1, 128.7, 127.8, 127.3, 119.0, 110.9. Methyl 4-Cyanobenzoate (2j)^5b White solid; yield: 62 mg (77%); m.p. 63–65°C. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 8.15 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.97 (s, 3 H). C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 165.4, 133.9, 132.2, 130.1, 118.0, 116.4, 52.7. 1-Naphthonitrile (2p)^5b White solid; yield: 52.8 mg (69%); m.p. 37–39°C. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 8.25 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.93 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.71 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.64 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.54 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 134.7, 134.2, 132.3, 129.2, 129.1, 128.4, 128.1, 127.7, 126.4, 119.3, 109.4.
• 17a Ge J.-J, Yao C.-Z, Wang M.-M, Zheng H.-X, Kang Y.-B, Li Y.-D. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 228
• 17b Ahmad A, Spenser ID. Can. J. Chem. 1960; 38: 1625
• 17c Jereb M. Curr. Org. Chem. 2013; 17: 1694
• 18a Song Q, Feng Q, Zhou M. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 5990
• 18b Zorin AV, Lenkova AO, Khachaturyan AB, Zorin VV. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2018; 88: 1590
• 18c Li Y.-T, Liao B.-S, Chen H.-P, Liu S.-T. Synthesis 2011; 2639