Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000083.xml
Synlett 2022; 33(12): 1189-1193
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1720887
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1720887
cluster
Organic Photoredox Catalysis in Synthesis – Honoring Prof. Shunichi Fukuzumi’s 70th Birthday
7,10-Dibromo-2,3-dicyanopyrazinophenanthrene Aggregates as a Photosensitizer for Nickel-Catalyzed Aryl Esterification
We are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21572028 and 21372035) for their financial support. This work was also supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (2019JH3/30100001), the National Joint Fund for Regional Innovation and Development (U20A20143), and LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC1802030).
Abstract
Self-assembled aggregates of 7,10-dibromo-2,3-dicyanopyrazinophenanthrene which act as a new organophotocatalyst in combination with Ni catalyst for the Caryl–Oacyl cross-coupling reactions of carboxylic acids with aryl halides are described. This visible-light-induced Caryl–Oacyl bond-formation reaction proceeds smoothly to afford aryl esters with satisfactory to excellent yields.
Key words
7,10-dibromo-2,3-dicyanopyrazinophenanthrene - aggregates - organophotocatalyst - carboxylic acids - aryl iodides - esterificationSupporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1720887.
- Supporting Information
Publication History
Received: 31 July 2021
Accepted after revision: 31 August 2021
Article published online:
22 September 2021
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1a Fujiwara K, Sato T, Sano Y, Norikura T, Katoono R, Suzuki T, Matsue H. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 5161
- 1b Klare JE, Tulevski GS, Sugo K, de Picciotto A, White KA, Nuckolls C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 6030
- 1c Schmidt JM, Tremblay GB, Pagé M, Mercure J, Feher M, Dunn-Dufault R, Peter MG, Redden PR. J. Med. Chem. 2003; 46: 1289
- 1d Reddy MV. R, Rao MR, Rhodes D, Hansen MS. T, Rubins K, Bushman FD, Venkateswarlu Y, Faulkner DJ. J. Med. Chem. 1999; 42: 1901
- 1e Pion F, Ducrot P.-H, Allais F. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2014; 215: 431
- 2a Chakraborti AK, Shivani S. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 5785
- 2b Ishihara K. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 1085
- 2c Carle MS, Shimokura GK, Murphy GK. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 23: 3930
- 2d Otera J. Chem. Rev. 1993; 93: 1449
- 3 Luo F, Pan CD, Qian PC, Cheng J. Synthesis 2010; 2005
- 4 Thasana N, Worayuthakarn R, Kradanrat P, Hohn E, Young L, Ruchirawat S. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 72: 9379
- 5a Dai JJ, Liu JH, Luo DF, Liu L. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 677
- 5b Zhang L, Zhang G, Zhang M, Cheng J. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 7472
- 6a Xie H, Yang S, Zhang C, Ding M, Liu M, Guo J, Zhang F. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 5250
- 6b Bhattarai B, Tay JH, Nagorny P. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 5398
- 7a Kitano H, Ito H, Itami K. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 2428
- 7b Liang JY, Shen SJ, Xu XH, Fu YL. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 6627
- 8 Colby DA, Bergman RG, Ellman JA. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 624
- 9a Krylov IB, Vil VA, Terent’ev AO. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015; 11: 92
- 9b Moghimi S, Mahdavi M, Shafiee A, Foroumadi A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 3282
- 10 Padala K, Jeganmohan M. Chem. Commun. 2013; 49: 9651
- 11a Lan J, Xie H, Lu X, Deng Y, Jiang H, Zeng W. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 4279
- 11b Lin C, Chen Z, Liu Z, Zhang Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018; 360: 519
- 11c Ueno R, Natsui S, Chatani N. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 1062
- 12 Wang F, Hu Q, Shu C, Lin Z, Min D, Shi T, Zhang W. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 3636
- 13 Welin ER, Le C, Arias-Rotondo DM, McCusker JK, MacMillan DW. C. Science 2017; 355: 380
- 14 Lu J, Pattengale B, Liu Q, Yang S, Shi W, Li S, Huang J, Zhang J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 13719
- 15 Zhu DL, Li HX, Xu ZM, Li HY, Young DJ, Lang JP. Org. Chem. Front. 2019; 6: 2353
- 16 Zu W, Day C, Wei L, Jia X, Xu L. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 8273
- 17 He M, Yu X, Wang Y, Li F, Bao M. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 5016
- 18 p-Carbomethoxyphenyl p-tert-Butylbenzoate (3e); Typical Procedure To a dried 20 mL reaction tube was charged with 4-(tert-butyl)benzoic acid (1e, 35.7 mg, 0.3 mmol), 4-iodobenzoate (2a, 52.4 mg, 0.2 mmol), DCPP2 (4.4 mg, 5 mol%), nickel(II) chlorine·diglyme (4.4 mg, 10 mol%), and dtbbpy (5.4 mg, 10 mol%). The tube was capped. After evacuated and backfilled nitrogen three times, DMF (3 mL) was added via a gastight syringe, followed by the addition of N-tert-butyl-isopropylamine (95 μL, 0.6 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred under the irradiation of a 10 W 430 nm blue LED at 40 °C for 24 h. After 24 h, the mixture was quenched with water and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuo. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1: 5) to afford a white solid (56.5 mg, 90%); mp 115–117 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.14–8.11 (m, 4 H), 7.55–7.53 (m, 2 H), 7.31–7.28 (m, 2 H), 3.93 (s, 3 H), 1.37 (s, 9 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.4, 164.6, 157.8, 154.7, 131.2, 130.1, 127.6, 126.3, 125.7, 121.8, 52.2, 35.2, 31.1. IR: ν = 3422, 3134, 1639, 1400, 1122, 1035, 962, 601, 561 cm–1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd [M + H]+: 313.1440; found: 313.1436.
- 19a Kumar GR, Sarkar SK, Thilagar P. Chemistry 2016; 22: 17215
- 19b Reckmeier CJ, Schneider J, Xiong Y, Häusler J, Kasák P, Schnick W, Rogach AL. Chem. Mater. 2017; 29: 10352
- 20a Terrett JA, Cuthbertson JD, Shurtleff VW, MacMillan DW. Nature 2015; 524: 330
- 20b Perry IB, Brewer TF, Sarver PJ, Schultz DM, DiRocco DA, MacMillan DW. C. Nature 2018; 560: 70
- 21 The energy level of the lowest-lying excited state is determined by calculating the energy of the wavelength at which the substrate’s UV/Vis absorption and emission spectra overlap, E0,0 (DCPP2) = 2.98 eV. E1/2 red([DCPP2] n */[DCPP2] n •−) = +1.32 V vs SCE in DMF.
- 22 Welin ER, Le C, Arias-Rotondo DM, McCusker JK, MacMillan DW. C. Science 2017; 355: 380