Download PDF
Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(01): E107-E111
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-107899
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

High efficacy with deep nurse-administered propofol sedation for advanced gastroenterologic endoscopic procedures

Jeppe Thue Jensen
1   Gastro unit D, Department of endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Denmark
,
Pernille Hornslet
1   Gastro unit D, Department of endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Denmark
,
Lars Konge
2   Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
,
Ann Merete Møller
3   Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Denmark
,
Peter Vilmann
1   Gastro unit D, Department of endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Denmark
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 December 2015 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: Whereas data on moderate nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) efficacy and safety for standard endoscopy is abundant, few reports on the use of deep sedation by endoscopy nurses during advanced endoscopy, such as Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) are available and potential benefits or hazards remain unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate the efficacy of intermittent deep sedation with propofol for a large cohort of advanced endoscopies and to provide data on the safety.

Patients and methods: All available data from patients sedated with intermittent deep NAPS for ERCP, EUS or double balloon enteroscopy (DBE, since the method was implemented in May 2007 through December 2012 were included for evaluation in a retrospective case-control design.

Results: Data from 1899 patients undergoing 1899 procedures were included for evaluation. All but one procedure were completed with intermittent deep NAPS. The mean propofol dose was 397 mg (SD: 232.4) and the infusion rate was 23.9 mg/kg. The frequency of hypoxia was 4.3 % and 20 patients needed assisted ventilation (1.1 %). Anesthesiologic support was requested eight times (0.4 %). One patient was intubated due to suspected aspiration.

Conclusions: Intermittent deep NAPS for advanced endoscopies in selected patients provided an almost 100 % success rate. However, the rate of hypoxia, hypotension and respiratory support was high compared with previously published data, but the method was still assessed as safe.

 

  • References

  • 1 Frieling T, Heise J, Kreysel C et al. Sedation-associated complications in endoscopy--prospective multicentre survey of 191142 patients. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 568-572
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rex DK, Deenadayalu VP, Eid E et al. Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience. Gastroenterology 2009; 137: 1229-1237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Goudra BG, Singh PM, Gouda G et al. Safety of non-anesthesia provider-administered propofol (NAAP) sedation in advanced gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: comparative meta-analysis of pooled results. Dig Dis Sci 03.03.2015; [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cheriyan DG, Byrne MF. Propofol use in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 18: 5171-5176
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ootaki C, Stevens T, Vargo J et al. Does general anesthesia increase the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses?. Anesthesiology 2012; 117: 1044-1050
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Nayar DS, Guthrie WG, Goodman A et al. Comparison of propofol deep sedation versus moderate sedation during endosonography. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 2537-2544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yarmus LB, Akulian JA, Gilbert C et al. Comparison of moderate versus deep sedation for endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2013; 10: 121-126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Horn E, Nesbit SA. Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of sedatives and analgesics. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2004; 14: 247-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dewitt J, McGreevy K, Sherman S et al. Nurse-administered propofol sedation compared with midazolam and meperidine for EUS: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 499-509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Singh H, Poluha W, Cheang M et al. Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rex DK, Heuss LT, Walker JA et al. Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 1384-1391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kulling D, Orlandi M, Inauen W. Propofol sedation during endoscopic procedures: how much staff and monitoring are necessary?. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 443-449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jensen JT, Moeller AM, Hornslet P et al. Moderate and deep nurse-administered propofol sedation is safe. Dan Med J 2015; 62: A5049 [Epup ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Riphaus A, Geist C, Schrader K et al. Intermittent manually controlled versus continuous infusion of propofol for deep sedation during interventional endoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 1078-1085
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Amornyotin S, Leelakusolvong S, Chalayonnawin W et al. Age-dependent safety analysis of propofol-based deep sedation for ERCP and EUS procedures at an endoscopy training center in a developing country. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2012; 5: 123-128
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chun SY, Kim KO, Park DS et al. Safety and efficacy of deep sedation with propofol alone or combined with midazolam administrated by nonanesthesiologist for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut Liver 2012; 6: 464-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lera Dos Santos ME, Maluf-Filho F, Chaves DM et al. Deep sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: propofol-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl regimens. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 3439-3446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Chan WH, Chang SL, Lin CS et al. Target-controlled infusion of propofol versus intermittent bolus of a sedative cocktail regimen in deep sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: Comparison of cardiovascular and respiratory parameters. J Dig Dis 2014; 15: 18-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Scheepstra GL, Booij LH, Rutten CL et al. Propofol for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia: comparison between younger and older patients. Br J Anaesth 1989; 62: 54-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Coley S, Mobley KA, Bone ME et al. Haemodynamic changes after induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation following propofol or thiopentone in patients of ASA grade I and III. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63: 423-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Goudra B, Singh PM. ERCP: The Unresolved Question of Endotracheal Intubation. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59: 513-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C et al. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 1229-1236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pagano N, Arosio M, Romeo F et al. Balanced Propofol Sedation in Patients Undergoing EUS-FNA: A Pilot Study to Assess Feasibility and Safety. Diagn Ther Endosc 2011; DOI: 10.1155/2011/542159.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Fanti L, Agostoni M, Arcidiacono PG et al. Target-controlled infusion during monitored anesthesia care in patients undergoing EUS: Propofol alone versus midazolam plus propofol A prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial. Digest Liver Dis 2007; 39: 81-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Yusoff IF, Raymond G, Sahai AV. Endoscopist administered propofol for upper-GI EUS is safe and effective: a prospective study in 500 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 356-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar