Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744541
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Thromboprophylaxis with Heparins Following Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Funding None.
Abstract
Background The efficacy and safety of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains unclear.
Methods A literature search was performed to collect studies comparing the effect of thromboprophylaxis in patients with ICH. The primary endpoints were deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and hematoma expansion or rebleeding. A meta-analytic approach was employed to estimate the relative risk (RR) by fitting fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) models.
Results A total of 28 studies representing 3,697 hospitalized patients with ICH were included. Thromboprophylaxis was initiated within 4 days following hospital presentation and continued for 10 to 14 days in most of studies. Compared with control, thromboprophylaxis was associated with a reduced risk of DVT (47/1,399 [3.4%] vs. 202/1,377 [14.7%]; FE: RR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.18–0.32; RE: RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.19–0.39) as well as PE (9/953 [0.9%] vs. 37/864 [4.3%]; FE: RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19–0.57; RE: RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21–0.66). Thromboprophylaxis was not associated with increased risk of hematoma expansion or rebleeding (32/1,319 [2.4%] vs. 37/1,301 [2.8%]; FE: RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.48–1.18; RE: RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.49–1.30) or mortality (117/925 [12.6%] vs. 139/904 [15.4%]; FE: RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65–1.03; RE: RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66–1.04).
Conclusion Thromboprophylaxis was effective in preventing DVT and PE without increasing the risk of hematoma expansion or bleeding among ICH patients. Future studies should explore the long-term effects of thromboprophylaxis in this population, particularly on the functional outcomes.
Author Contributions
G.C. had full access to all of the data in the study and took responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors approved the final version to be published, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Conception and design: G.C., J.M. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: G.C., J.J.L., S.S., J.M., M.L.C. Drafting of the manuscript: G.C., J.J.L, S.S. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: J.M., M.L.C. Statistical analysis: G.C. Supervision: M.L.C.
Publication History
Received: 31 July 2021
Accepted: 08 February 2022
Article published online:
19 June 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany