References
-
1a
Kocienski PJ.
Protecting Groups
3rd ed.:
Georg Thieme Verlag;
Stuttgart:
2004.
-
1b
Greene TW.
Wuts PGM.
Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis
3rd ed.:
Wiley-Interscience;
New York / Weinheim:
1999.
p.615-631
-
2a
He F.
Snider BB.
Synlett
1997,
483
-
2b
Yokoyama F.
Sugiyama H.
Aoyama T.
Shiori T.
Synthesis
2004,
1476
-
2c
Baran PS.
Guerrero CA.
Corey EJ.
Org. Lett.
2003,
5:
1999
- 3
Teranishi K.
Hayashi S.
Nakatsuka S.
Goto T.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1994,
35:
8173
- 4
Horwell DC.
McKiernan MJ.
Osborne S.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1998,
39:
8729
- 5
Teranishi K.
Hayashi S.
Nakatsuka S.
Goto T.
Synthesis
1995,
506
-
6a
Stratmann K.
Moore RE.
Bonjouklian R.
Deeter JB.
Patterson GML.
Shaffer S.
Smith CD.
Smitka TA.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994,
116:
9935
-
6b
Smith CD.
Zilfou JT.
Stratmann K.
Patterson GML.
Moore RE.
Mol. Pharmacol.
1995,
47:
241
- 7 For a review of synthetic work on welwitindolinones and related areas, see: Avendaño C.
Menéndez JC.
Curr. Org. Synth.
2004,
1:
65
-
For selected reviews on MDR modulators, see:
-
8a
Wiese M.
Pajeva IK.
Curr. Med. Chem.
2001,
8:
685
-
8b
Teodori E.
Dei S.
Scapecchi S.
Gualtieri F.
Il Farmaco
2002,
57:
385
-
8c
Avendaño C.
Menéndez JC.
Curr. Med. Chem.
2002,
9:
159
-
8d
Robert J.
Jarry C.
J. Med. Chem.
2003,
46:
4805
-
8e
Avendaño C.
Menéndez JC.
Med. Chem. Rev. Online
2004,
1:
419
-
11a
Zhao S.
Gan T.
Yu P.
Cook JM.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1998,
39:
7009
-
11b
Zhao S.
Smith KS.
Deveau AM.
Dieckhaus CM.
Johnson MA.
Macdonald TL.
Cook JM.
J. Med. Chem.
2002,
45:
1559
-
11c
Selvi S.
Pu S.-C.
Cheng Y.-M.
Fang J.-M.
Chou PT.
J. Org. Chem.
2004,
69:
6674
- 12
Hwu JR.
Wong FF.
Huang JJ.
Tsay SC.
J. Org. Chem.
1997,
62:
4097
-
13a
Kowalski C.
Creary X.
Rollin AJ.
Burke MC.
J. Org. Chem.
1978,
43:
2601
-
13b
De Kimpe N.
Palamareva M.
Schamp N.
J. Org. Chem.
1985,
50:
2993
- 14
Hoare JH.
Yates P.
J. Org. Chem.
1983,
48:
3333
- 15
Baceiredo A.
Bertrand G.
Dyer PW.
Fawcett J.
Griep-Raming N.
Guerret O.
Hanton MJ.
Russell DR.
Williamson AM.
New J. Chem.
2001,
25:
591
9
Representative Procedure for the
N
-Pivaloylation:
To a stirred suspension of NaH (409 mg, 17.08 mmol) in dry THF (20 mL) was added a solution of indole-3-carbaldehyde (1.230 g, 8.54 mmol) in dry THF (20 mL), under an argon atmosphere. After stirring at r.t. for 5 min, hydrogen evolution ceased and the solution became reddish yellow in color. Pivaloyl chloride (1.05 mL, 1.03 g, 8.54 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 1 h. After confirming by TLC the disappearance of the starting indole, the reaction mixture was poured onto a sat. aq NH4Cl solution (30 mL), which was then extracted with CH2Cl2 (5 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated to yield 1-pivaloylindole-3-carbaldehyde as a pale orange solid (1.79 g, 92%). Mp 93-95 °C. IR: 1711, 1678, 1551, 1400 cm-1. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 10.32 (s, 1 H, CHO), 8.46 (d, 1 H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-7), 8.34 (s, 1 H, H-2), 8.28 (d, 1 H, J = 8.1 Hz, H-4), 7.47-7.40 (m, 2 H, H-5 and H-6), 1.58 [(s, 9 H, C(CH3)3] ppm. 13C NMR (63 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 185.8 (CHO), 177.2 (CO-t-Bu), 135.5 (C-7), 126.8 (C-4), 126.4 (C-7a), 125.3 (C-2), 123.0 (C-3a), 122.0 (C-3), 121.6 (C-6), 117.6 (C-5), 38.6 [C(CH3)3], 28.43 [C(CH3)3] ppm. Anal. Calcd for C14H15NO2: C, 73.34; H, 6.59; N, 6.11. Found: C, 73.04; H, 6.86; N, 6.03.
10
Representative Procedure for the Deprotection:
A 1.6 M solution of butyllithium in hexanes (5.45 mL, 8.72 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of diisopropylamine (880 mg, 8.72 mmol) in dry THF (20 mL), at 0 °C, under an argon atmosphere. Stirring was continued for 10 min at 0 °C, and the solution of LDA thus prepared was added via cannula to a stirred solution of 1-pivaloyl-indole-3-carbaldehyde (1 g, 4.36 mmol) in dry THF (20 mL), under an argon atmosphere at -78 °C. When the addition was complete, the reaction mixture was heated in an oil bath at 40-45 °C for 2 h, cooled and poured onto a sat. aq NH4Cl solution (30 mL), which was then extracted with CH2Cl2 (5 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated, and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel, eluting with 9:1 EtOAc-petroleum ether, yielding indole-3-carbaldehyde (627 mg, 99%), which was identical in all respects to the commercially available sample employed as starting material for the protection reaction.