Download PDF
Synlett 2005(3): 501-505  
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-862356
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Tandem Catalysis: A Ring-Closing Metathesis Followed by Dehydrogenative Oxidation to Afford Substituted Indenones

Willem A. L. van Otterlo*, E. Mabel Coyanis, Jenny-Lee Panayides, Charles B. de Koning, Manuel A. Fernandes
Molecular Sciences Institute, School of Chemistry, University of the Witwatersrand, PO Wits, 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa
Fax: +27(11)7176749; e-Mail: willem@aurum.chem.wits.ac.za;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 29 October 2004
Publication Date:
04 February 2005 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Grubbs second generation catalyst converts substituted 1-(2-propenylphenyl)prop-2-en-1-ols into substituted indenols or indenones depending on the reaction conditions employed. The formation of indenones represents the first example of a tandem ruthenium-mediated ring-closing metathesis-dehydrogenative oxidation reaction.

Key words

metathesis - ruthenium - dehydrogenations - tandem ­reactions - indenols - indenones

    References

  • 1a Deiters A. Martin SF. Chem. Rev.  2004,  104:  2199 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 1b McReynolds MD. Dougherty JM. Hanson PR. Chem. Rev.  2004,  104:  2239 , and reviews cited therein
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Alcaide B. Almendros P. Chem.-Eur. J.  2003,  9:  1259 
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Schmidt B. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2004,  1865 
    Google Scholar
  • 4a Fürstner A. Thiel OR. Ackermann L. Schanz H.-J. Nolan SP. J. Org. Chem.  2000,  65:  2204 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4b Kinderman SS. Doodeman R. van Beijma JW. Russcher JC. Tjen KCMF. Kooistra TM. Mohaselzadeh H. van Maarseveen JH. Hiemstra H. Schoemaker HE. Rutjes FPJT. Adv. Synth. Catal.  2002,  344:  736 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4c Sutton AE. Seigal BA. Finnegan DF. Snapper ML. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2002,  124:  13390 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4d De Clercq B. Verpoort F. J. Organomet. Chem.  2003,  672:  11 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4e Louie J. Bielawski CW. Grubbs RH. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2001,  123:  11312 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4f Schmidt B. Pohler M. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2003,  1:  2512 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4g van Otterlo WAL. Ngidi EL. Coyanis EM. de Koning CB. Tetrahedron Lett.  2003,  44:  311 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4h Fogg DE. Amoroso D. Drouin SD. Snelgrove J. Conrad J. Zamanian F. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.  2002,  190:  177 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4i Moreno-Mañas M. Pleixats R. Santamaria A. Synlett  2001,  1784 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4j Schmidt B. Chem. Commun.  2004,  742 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4k Rosillo M. Casarrubios L. Domínguez G. Pérez-Castells J. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2003,  1:  1450 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5a van Otterlo WAL. Ngidi EL. de Koning CB. Tetrahedron Lett.  2003,  44:  6483 
    Google Scholar
  • 5b van Otterlo WAL. Pathak R. de Koning CB. Synlett  2003,  1859 
    Google Scholar
  • 5c van Otterlo WAL. Ngidi EL. de Koning CB. Fernandes MA. Tetrahedron Lett.  2004,  45:  659 
    Google Scholar
  • 6a Coombs MM. Benzocyclopropene, Benzocyclobutene and Indene, and their Derivatives, In Rodd’s Chemistry of Carbon Compounds   2nd ed., 2nd Suppl., Vol. IIIF(partial)/IIIG/IIIH:  Sainsbury M. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1995. 
    Google Scholar
  • 6b Ivchenko NB. Ivchenko PV. Nifant’ev IE. Russ. J. Org. Chem.  2000,  36:  609 
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Ishiguru Y. Okamoto K. Ojima F. Sonoda Y. Chem. Lett.  1993,  1139 
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Sengupta P. Sen M. Niyogi SK. Pakrashi SC. Ali E. Phytochemistry  1976,  15:  995 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Harrowven DC. Newman NA. Knight CA. Tetrahedron Lett.  1998,  39:  6757 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10a Chang K.-J. Rayabarapu DK. Cheng C.-H. J. Org. Chem.  2004,  69:  4781 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10b Quan LG. Gevorgyan V. Yamamoto Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1999,  121:  3545 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10c Gevorgyan V. Quan LG. Yamamoto Y. Tetrahedron Lett.  1999,  40:  4089 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10d Vicente J. Abad J.-A. Gil-Rubio J. Organometallics  1996,  15:  3509 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11a Pletnev AA. Tian Q. Larock RC. J. Org. Chem.  2002,  67:  9276 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11b Padwa A. Molecules  2001,  6:  1 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11c Fukuyama T. Chatani N. Kakiuchi F. Murai S. J. Org. Chem.  1997,  62:  5647 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 For a recently reported route to an indenol using a RCM approach see: Clive DLJ. Yu M. Sannigrahi M. J. Org. Chem.  2004,  69:  4116 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 de Koning CB. Michael JP. Rousseau AL. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  2000,  787 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Krompiec S. KuŸnik N. Penczek R. Rzepa J. Mrowiec-Bialoñ J. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.  2004,  219:  29 ; and citations therein
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16a Huang K.-S. Wang E.-C. Tetrahedron Lett.  2001,  42:  6155 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16b de Koning CB. Giles RGF. Green IR. Jahed NM. Tetrahedron  2003,  59:  3175 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Storage of the indenols (as oils) without the exclusion of air resulted in a slow conversion into indenones (ca. 5% over six months)
  • A literature search also revealed that mild oxidants such a MnO2,23a chromium(III)(salen) with PhI(OAc)2 23b or PhIO23c have been successfully used to accomplish the indenol to indenone transformation. See
  • 23a Wu Y. Ahlberg P. Acta Chem. Scand.  1995,  49:  364 
    Google Scholar
  • 23b Adam W. Hajra S. Herderich M. Saha-Möller CR. Org. Lett.  2000,  2:  2773 
    Google Scholar
  • 23c Adam W. Gadissa Gelalcha F. Saha-Möller CR. Stegmann VR. J. Org. Chem.  2000,  65:  1915 
    Google Scholar
  • 24a Cho JH. Kim BM. Org. Lett.  2003,  5:  531 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24b Mi Ahn Y. Yang K. Georg GI. Org. Lett.  2001,  3:  1411 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25a Westhus M. Gonthier E. Brohm D. Breinbauer R. Tetrahedron Lett.  2004,  45:  3141 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 25b Gonthier E. Breinbauer R. Synlett  2003,  1049 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • When a NMR spectroscopically monitored experiment (d 8-toluene) was conducted on 5a (with catalyst 1) at 105 °C, evidence suggested that a ruthenium-promoted redox isomerization was occurring to form the corresponding indanone 8. See the following references describing this type of transformation mediated by ruthenium metathesis catalysts:
  • 26a Greenwood ES. Parsons PJ. Young MJ. Synth. Commun.  2003,  33:  223 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26b Gurjar MK. Yakambram P. Tetrahedron Lett.  2001,  42:  3633 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26c Trost BM. Kulawiec RJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1993,  115:  2027 . Repeating the experiment in a conventional manner on substrate 5a [toluene, catalyst 1 (5%), r.t., 24 h, then ca. 100 °C, 18 h] gave the indanone 8 in an unoptimized yield of 51%; its structure was confirmed by various spectroscopic techniques. To the best of our knowledge this constitutes the first report of a tandem RCM-redox isomerization reaction and we will be investigating reactions of this type in more detail. 4-Isopropoxy-5-methoxyindan-1-one (8): 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.48 (d, 1 H, J = 8.3 Hz, 7-H), 6.95 (d, 1 H, J = 8.3 Hz, 6-H), 4.51 [sept, 1 H, J = 6.1 Hz, CH(CH3)2], 3.90 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 3.08-3.02 (m, 2 H, 2-H), 2.66-2.60 (m, 2 H, 3-H), 1.29 [d, 6 H, J = 6.1 Hz, CH(CH 3)2]. 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 205.6 (C=O), 157.6 (C), 149.0 (C), 143.4 (C), 131.0 (C), 119.7 (CH), 112.1 (CH), 74.6 (OCH), 56.1 (OCH3), 36.4 (C-2), 22.9 (C-3), 22.7 (CH3). IR: 1708, 1598 cm-1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd for C13H16O3: 220.10995; found: 220.10989. MS: m/z (%) = 220 (33) [M + ], 178 (100), 163 (8), 150 (6), 149 (6), 135 (15), 107 (10)
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27a Meijer RH. Ligthart GBWL. Meuldijk J. Vekemans JAJM. Hulshof LA. Mills AM. Kooijman H. Spek AL. Tetrahedron  2004,  60:  1065 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27b Ligthart GBWL. Meijer RH. Donners MPJ. Meuldijk J. Vekemans JAJM. Hulshof LA. Tetrahedron Lett.  2003,  44:  1507 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27c Choi JH. Kim N. Shin YJ. Park JH. Park J. Tetrahedron Lett.  2004,  45:  4607 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
13

Work taken from the post-doctoral research project of Dr. E. M. Coyanis and the ongoing MSc project of Ms J.-L. Panayides.

17

Typical Experimental Procedure for Forming Indenols:
Grubbs catalyst 1 (5 mol%) was added to a degassed solution (N2) of 5a (262 mg, 0.62 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (25 mL). The solution was then stirred under N2 at r.t. for 3 h. After evaporation of the solvent and column chromatographic purification of the residue (5-10% EtOAc-hexane), 4-isopropoxy-5-methoxy-1H-inden-1-ol (6a) was obtained as a pale yellow oil (191 mg, 87%). 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, assignments with the same superscript may be interchanged): δ = 7.12 (d, 1 H, J = 7.9 Hz, 7-H), 6.73 (d, 1 H, J = 5.6 Hz, 3-H), 6.66 (d, 1 H, J = 7.9 Hz, 2-H), 6.27 (dd, 1 H, J = 5.6 and 2.0 Hz, 6-H), 5.04 (br s, 1 H, 1-H), 4.33 [br sept, 1 H, J = 6.2 Hz, CH(CH3)2], 3.80 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 2.08 (br s, 1 H, OH), 1.28 [d, 3 H, J = 6.4 Hz, CH(CH 3)CH3], 1.25 [d, 3 H, J = 6.5 Hz, CH(CH3)CH 3]. 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 153.3 (C), 140.1 (C), 138.4 (C), 137.8 (CH), 136.7 (C), 129.2 (CH), 118.9 (CH), 109.4 (CH), 77.1 (OCH), 75.6 (C-O), 55.9 (OCH3), 22.5 (CH3), 22.4 (CH3).
IR: 3400(br), 1674, 1617, 1596, 1556 cm-1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd for C13H16O3: 220.10995; found: 220.10990. MS: m/z (%) = 220 (69) [M + ], 179 (18), 178 (100), 177 (28), 176 (16), 163 (41), 161 (12), 149 (16), 147 (18), 146 (18), 135 (10), 118 (10), 77 (10), 69 (11), 57 (14), 55 (12), 43 (28), 41 (19).

18

All new compounds were identified using routine spectroscopy and gave satisfactory data.

19

In an attempt to improve the yields of indenols 6d and 6e we protected the alcohol functionalities of 5d and 5e with acetyl groups. However, much to our surprise, the RCM reactions of these substrates, at r.t. or at 110 °C, did not proceed to afford the acetyl-protected cyclic products and only starting material was recovered.

20

Typical Experimental Procedure for Forming Indenones:
Grubbs catalyst 1 (8 mol%) was added to a degassed solution (N2) of 5a (141 mg, 0.54 mmol) in toluene (10 mL). The solution was then heated at 80 °C under N2 for 2 h. Evaporation of the solvent and column chromatographic purification of the residue (20% EtOAc-hexane) then afforded 4-isopropoxy-5-methoxyinden-1-one (7a) as a yellow semi-solid (72 mg, 62%). 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.64 (d, 1 H, J = 5.8 Hz, H-3), 7.38 (d, 1 H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-7), 6.60 (d, 1 H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-6), 5.86 (d, 1 H, J = 5.8 Hz, H-2), 4.40 [sept, 1 H, J = 6.1 Hz, CH(CH3)2], 3.87 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 1.31 [d, 6 H, J = 6.1 Hz, CH(CH 3)2]. 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.2 (C=O), 158.8 (C), 145.5 (CH), 142.0 (C), 137.5 (C), 127.9 (CH), 123.9 (C), 119.7 (CH), 109.8 (CH), 75.9 (OCH), 56.1 (OCH3), 22.4 (CH3). IR: 1708, 1604 cm-1. HRMS (CI): m/z calcd for C13H14O3: 218.09430; found: 218.09433. MS: m/z (%) = 218 (29) [M + ], 193 (21), 178 (20), 177 (40), 176 (100), 175 (25), 163 (17), 161 (23), 149 (37), 147 (20), 105 (21), 91 (17), 77 (26), 73 (23), 69 (22), 57 (33), 55 (26), 43 (49), 41 (46).

21

X-ray crystal structure of 4-isopropoxy-5-methoxy-2-methyl-3-phenylinden-1-one (7f): crystallized from CHCl3, formula: C20H20O3, M = 308.36, color of crystal: yellow, prism, crystal size 0.31 × 0.20 × 0.02 mm, a = 6.3298 (11) Å, b = 18.133 (3) Å, c = 7.7645 (13) Å, β = 110.094 (3)°, V = 836.9 (2) Å3, ρcalc = 1.224 Mg/m3, µ = 0.081 mm-1, F(000) = 328, Z = 2, monoclinic, space group P21, T = 293 K, 5132 reflections collected, 2444 independent reflections, θmax = 26.50°, 212 refined parameters, maximum residual electron density 0.129 and -0.161 e·Å-3. R1 = 0.0421, wR2 = 0.0813. Crystallographic data for the structure have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as deposition No. CCDC-250072.