Utilizing IHE-based Electronic Health Record Systems for Secondary Use

Summary

Objectives: Due to the increasing adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) for primary use, the number of electronic documents stored in such systems will soar in the near future. In order to benefit from this development in secondary fields such as medical research, it is important to define requirements for the secondary use of EHR data. Furthermore, analyses of the extent to which an IHE (Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise)-based architecture would fulfill these requirements could provide further information on upcoming obstacles for the secondary use of EHRs.

Methods: A catalog of eight core requirements for secondary use of EHR data was deduced from the published literature, the risk analysis of the IHE profile MPQ (Multi-Patient Queries) and the analysis of relevant questions. The IHE-based architecture for cross-domain, patient-centered document sharing was extended to a cross-patient architecture.

Results: We propose an IHE-based architecture for cross-patient and cross-domain secondary use of EHR data. Evaluation of this architecture concerning the eight core requirements revealed positive fulfillment of six and the partial fulfillment of two requirements.

Conclusions: Although not regarded as a primary goal in modern electronic healthcare, the re-use of existing electronic medical documents in EHRs for research and other fields of secondary application holds enormous potential for the future. Further research in this respect is necessary.

Keywords

Electronic health record - data retrieval - secondary use - integrating the healthcare enterprise

• References

• 1 Jha A, Doolan D, Grandt D, Scott T, Bates D. The use of health information technology in seven nations. Int J Med Inform 2008; 77 (12) 848-854.
• 2 Bisbal J, Berry D. An Analysis Framework for Electronic Health Record Systems. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (02) 180-189.
• 3 IBM. Feasibility study for implementing the electronic health record (ELGA) in the Austrian health system. 2006 (cited 02.12.2010). Available from: http://www.arge-elga.at/fileadmin/user_upload/uploads/download_Papers/Arge_Papers/Machbarkeitsstudie_ELGA_Enbericht_21112006.pdf German
• 4 IHE. IT Infrastructure Technical Framework, Vol. 1 (ITI TF-1): Integration Profiles. 2009 (cited 02.12.2010). Available from: http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_ITI_TF_6–0_Vol1_FT_2009–08–10–2.pdf
• 5 IHE. IHE IT Infrastructure (ITI) Multi-Patient Queries. 2009 (cited 02.12.2010). Available from: http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_ITI_TF_Supplement_MPQ_2009–08–10.pdf
• 6 Safran C. Using routinely collected data for clinical research. Stat Med 1991; 10 (04) 559-564.
• 7 Safran C, Chute C. Exploration and exploitation of clinical databases. Int J Biomed Comput 1995; 39 (01) 151-156.
• 8 Bain M, Chalmers J, Brewster D. Routinely collected data in national and regional databases – an under-used resource. J Public Health Med 1997; 19 (04) 413-418.
• 9 Cruz-Correia R, Rodrigues P, Freitas A, Almeida F, Chen RA. C-P. Data Quality and Integration Issues in Electronic Health Records. In: Hristidis V. editor. Information discovery on electronic health records. London: CRC Press; 2010. pp 55-95.
• 10 Hanauer D, Rhodes D, Chinnaiyan A. Exploring clinical associations using “-omics” based enrichment analyses. PLoS One 2009; 4 (04) e5203.
• 11 Willison D, Steeves V, Charles C, Schwartz L, Ran-ford J, Agarwal G. et al. Consent for use of personal information for health research: do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions?. BMC Med Ethics 2009; 10: 10.
• 12 Tannen R, Weiner M, Xie D. Use of primary care electronic medical record database in drug efficacy research on cardiovascular outcomes: comparison of database and randomised controlled trial findings. BMJ 2009; 338: b81.
• 13 Gall W, Grossmann W, Duftschmid G, Wrba T, Dorda W. Analysis of EHRs for research, quality management and health politics. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 136: 425-430.
• 14 Safran C, Bloomrosen M, Hammond W, Labkoff S, Markel-Fox S, Tang P. et al. Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association White Paper. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (01) 1-9.
• 15 ARGEDaten. Indirect-individual-related data – Are constraints in DSG 2000 consistent with European Union law?. 2006 [cited 02.12.2010]; Available from: http://www2.argedaten.at/php/cms_monitor.php?q=PUB-TEXT-ARGEDATEN&s=75776hwg In German
• 16 Blobel B, Pharow P. Analysis and evaluation of EHR approaches. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (02) 162-169.
• 17 Klein A, Prokosch H, Müller M, Ganslandt T. Experiences with an interoperable data acquisition platform for multi-centric research networks based on HL7 CDA. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (05) 580-585.
• 18 Ma C, Frankel H, Beale T, Heard S. EHR query language (EQL) – a query language for archetype-based health records. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 129 Pt 1 397-401.
• 19 Austrian Federal Chancellery. Austrian IT Security Handbook. Vienna: Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft (OCG); 2007
• 20 German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI). BSI-Standard 100-3: Risk Analysis based on IT-Grundschutz. 2008 (cited 02.12.2010). Available from: https://www.bsi.bund.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/471432/publicationFile/27992/standard_100–3_e_pdf.pdf
• 21 ARGE ELGA. The Austrian electronic health record – Outlook on the first phase of implementation. 2007 (cited 02.12.2010). Available from: http://www.arge-elga.at/fileadmin/user_upload/uploads/download_Papers/Arge_Papers/ELGA_Umsetzung_Phase1__V2.0.pdf In German
• 22 IHE. IHE IT Infrastructure (ITI) Cross-Community Information Exchange White Paper. 2008 (cited 02.12.2010). Available from: http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_ITI_TF_White_Paper_Cross_Commnity_2008–11–07.pdf
• 23 Pommerening K, Reng M. Secondary use of the EHR via pseudonymisation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 103: 441-446.
• 24 El Emam K, Dankar FK. Protecting privacy using k-anonymity. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15 (05) 627-637.
• 25 Machanavajjhala A, Gehrke J, Kifer D, Venkitasubramaniam M. l-Diversity: Privacy Beyond k-Anonymity. 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’06) 2006. Atlanta, Georgia, USA:
• 26 IHE. IHE Patient Care Coordination (PCC) Technical Framework Supplement – Query for Existing Data (QED). 2008 (cited 02.12.2010). Available from: http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_PCC_Query_for_Existing_Data_QED_Supplement_TI_2008–08–22.pdf
• 27 IHE. IHE Patient Care Coordination (PCC) Technical Framework Supplement – Care Management (CM). 2008 (cited 02.12.2010). Available from: http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_PCC_Care_Management_CM_Supplement_TI_2008–08–22.pdf
• 28 IHE. IHE Quality, Research and Public Health (QRPH) Technical Framework Supplement – Clinical Research Document (CRD). 2009 (cited 02.12.2010). Available from: http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_QRPH_TF_Supplement_CRD_TI_2009–08–11.pdf
• 29 Protti D. Integrated care needs integrated information management and technology. Healthc Q 2009; 13 Spec No: 24-29.
• 30 Prokosch H, Ganslandt T. Perspectives for medical informatics Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (01) 38-44.
• 31 Dogac A, Laleci G, Aden T, Eichelberg M. Enhancing IHE XDS for federated clinical affinity domain support. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2007; 11 (02) 213-221.
• 32 Kukafka R, Ancker J, Chan C, Chelico J, Khan S, Mortoti S. et al. Redesigning electronic health record systems to support public health. J Biomed Inform 2007; 40 (04) 398-409.