Osteochondral autograft transfer for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the medial femoral condyle in dogs

Summary

Objective: To describe the clinical application of osteochondral autograft transfer procedure for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the canine medial femoral condyle and to report clinical and force plate outcomes.

Methods: Osteochondral autograft transfer (OATS™; Arthrex, Naples FL, USA) instrumentation was employed in six stifle joints of five dogs. Clinical examination was performed preoperatively and at two to three weeks, six to eight weeks, 12–18 weeks and at >22 months postoperatively. Radiography and arthroscopy were performed preoperatively and 12–18 weeks postoperatively. The followup examinations performed at 22 to 56 months included radiography, questionnaire completion with the owner, and force plate gait evaluation.

Results: Articular surface reconstruction was radiographically (for 6 stifle joints) and arthroscopically (for 5 stifle joints) maintained at 12–18 weeks. Subjectively-assessed lameness resolved in five out of six stifles by the 12 to 18 week reassessment. Morbidity included lateral patellar luxation at seven weeks and cranial cruciate ligament rupture at 11 months postoperatively. At the >22 month re-evaluation examination, subjectively-assessed lameness and signs of discomfort were minimal. Owner perceptions of outcome were positive; force plate assessment of gait indicated that weight bearing on three out of six OAT implanted limbs was less than the contralateral limb, but these comparisons were not evaluated statistically. A progression in the development of osteophytes was radiographically evident.

Clinical significance: The OAT procedure can reconstruct medial femoral condyle OCD defects in dogs. Long-term lameness and progressive osteophytosis may occur but can be associated with other pathology such as cruciate ligament insufficiency.

Keywords

Osteochondral - autograft - osteochondritis dissecans - stifle - canine

• References

• 1 Ekman S, Carlson CS. The pathophysiology of osteochondrosis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1998; 28: 17-32.
• 2 Harari J. Osteochondrosis of the femur. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1998; 28: 87-94.
• 3 Montgomery RD, Henderson RA, Milton JL. et al. Osteochondritis dissecans of the canine stifle. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1989; 11: 1199-1205.
• 4 McKee WM, Cook JL. The stifle. In: Houlton JEF, Cook JL, Innes JF. et al. editors. Manual of Canine and Feline Musculoskeletal Disorders. Gloucester, UK: British Small Animal Veterinary Association; 2006. pg. 350-395.
• 5 Cook JL, Hudson CC, Kuroki K. Autogenous osteochondral grafting for treatment of stifle osteochondrosis in dogs. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 311-321.
• 6 Kulendra E, Lee K, Schoeniger S. et al. Osteochondritis dissecans-like lesion of the intercondylar fossa of the femur in a dog. Vet Comp Orthop Tramatol 2008; 21: 152-155.
• 7 Adamiak Z, Nowicki M. Implementation of osteochondral autografting for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the canine stifle joint. A case report. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2007; 51: 705-708.
• 8 Palierne S, Bilmont A, Raymond-Letron I. et al. A case of stifle osteochondrosis treated by osteochondral autogenous grafting. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 190-195.
• 9 Fitzpatrick N, Yeadon R, Smith T. Early clinical experience with osteochondral autograft transfer for treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the medial humeral condyle in dogs. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 247-260.
• 10 Fitzpatrick N, Van Terheijden C, Yeadon R. et al. Osteochondral autograft transfer for treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the caudocentral humeral head in dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 925-935.
• 11 Glenn RE, McCarty EC, Potter HG. et al. Comparison of fresh osteochondral autografts and allografts: A canine model. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34: 1084-1093.
• 12 Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z. et al. Autogenous osteochondral graft technique for replacing knee cartilage defects in dogs. Clin Orthop 1997; 5: 175-181.
• 13 Dew TL, Martin RA. Functional, radiographic, and histologic assessment of healing of autogenous osteochondral grafts and full-thickness cartilage defects in the talus of dogs. Am J Vet Res 1992; 53: 2141-2152.
• 14 Whitney WO. Arthroscopically assisted surgery of the stifle joint. In: Beale BS, Hulse DA, Schulz KS. et al. editors. Small Animal Arthroscopy. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2003. pg. 117-130.
• 15 Voss K, Imhof J, Kaestner S. et al. Force plate gait analysis at the walk and trot in dogs with lowgrade hindlimb lameness. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 299-304.
• 16 Gudas R, Kalesinskas RJ, Kimtys V. et al. A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes. Arthroscopy 2005; 21: 1066-1075.
• 17 Evans R, Horstman C, Conzemius M. Accuracy and optimization of force platform gait analysis in Labradors with cranial cruciate disease evaluated at a walking gait. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 445-449.
• 18 Böttcher P, Zeissler M, Maierl J. et al. Mapping of split-line pattern and cartilage thickness of selected donor and recipient sites for autologous osteochondral transplantation in the canine stifle joint. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 696-704.