The Swinging Flashlight Test – Flawed Execution and Interpretation in Ophthalmological Routine

Abstract

Background The swinging flashlight test is a standard diagnostic procedure to detect relative afferent pupillary defects. The advantages of the test lie within its objectivity and minimal effort. However, its value depends on its correct execution and interpretation. This questionnaire-based survey investigates whether this is given among German speaking ophthalmologists.

Methods A multiple-choice questionnaire with 14 questions on the use of the swinging flashlight test was designed. It was presented to German speaking ophthalmology specialists (primary data) and orthoptists (secondary data) on specialist conferences or by telephone interviews.

Results 249 ophthalmologists and 76 orthoptists participated in the survey. Only 2% of ophthalmologists answered all 14 questions correctly. On average 66% (range 29 – 100%) of the questions were answered correctly by the ophthalmologists. The question with the lowest result had a rate of 19%, the question with the highest result was correctly answered by 95%. The orthoptists achieved similar results.

Conclusion The rate of correct answers appears disturbingly low. The swinging flashlight test being a basic tool and an obligatory test in a number of guidelines should rather be performed nearly error-free. In light of the high error rates, misdiagnoses and treatment errors must be feared. Better training seems necessary.

Key words

neuroophthalmology - swinging flashlight test - pupil - quality of care - optic nerve

Publication History

Received: 03 September 2020

Accepted: 21 September 2020

Article published online:
17 November 2020

• References/Literatur

• 1 Bach L. Pupillenlehre. Basel: Karger; 1908
• 2 Levatin P, Prasloski PF, Collen MF. The swinging flashlight test in multiphasic screening for eye disease. Can J Ophthalmol 1973; 8: 356-360
• 3 Kestenbaum A. Clinical Methods of neuro-ophthalmological Examination. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1946
• 4 Stanley JA, Baise GR. The swinging flashlight test to detect minimal optic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1968; 80: 769-771
• 5 Levatin P. Pupillary escape in disease of the retina or optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol 1959; 62: 768-779
• 6 Johnson LN. The effect of light intensity on measurement of the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 1990; 109: 481-482
• 7 Wilhelm H. Pupillenreaktionen – Pupillenstörungen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 1991
• 8 Thompson HS, Corbett JJ, Cox TA. How to measure the relative afferent pupillary defect. Surv Ophthalmol 1981; 26: 39-42
• 9 Cox TA. Pupillographic characteristics of simulated relative afferent pupillary defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30: 1127-1131
• 10 Kawasaki A, Moore P, Kardon RH. Variability of the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 1995; 120: 622-633
• 11 Wilhelm H, Haberl GCY, Beisse F. Neuroophthalmologie in der augenärztlichen Weiterbildung an den Universitätsaugenkliniken. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2014; 231: 1090-1092
• 12 Shwe-Tin A, Smith GT, Checketts D. et al. Evaluation and calibration of a binocular infrared pupillometer for measuring relative afferent pupillary defect. J Neuroophthalmol 2012; 32: 111-115
• 13 Wilhelm B, Lüdtke H, Peters T. et al. Automatisierter Swinging-flashlight-Test bei Patienten mit Sehnervenerkrankungen. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2001; 218: 21-25
• 14 Volpe NJ, Plotkin ES, Maguire MG. et al. Portable pupillography of the swinging flashlight test to detect afferent pupillary defects. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 1913-1921