DBU- and DABCO-Promoted Selective Access to 2,5-Diarylnitrobenzoates and Cyclohexenones via One-Pot Reactions

Abstract

Remarkable organobase-controlled selective synthesis of a wide breadth of valuable 2,5-diaryl-4-nitrobenzoates and 1-hydroxy-4-oxocyclohexencarboxylates bearing a tetrasubstituted stereogenic carbon is reported. This one-pot cyclization reaction operates between a bunch of 3-nitroallylarenes and β,γ-unsaturated α-ketocarbonyls by carefully choosing DBU or DABCO as an organobase under aerobic conditions. Notably, as a nucleophilic base, DABCO favors the Nef reaction over the dehydration–aerial oxidation process, aiming for unexpected cyclohexanone architectures. Moreover, this operationally simple technique holds a few positive qualities: good yields with diastereoselectivities (dr ≤ 91:9), broad substrate scope, no added oxidant, excellent functional group compatibility, 100% carbon-economical, etc. Furthermore, the obtained 4-nitrobenzoate framework has been utilized for the synthesis of a range of valuable compounds such as 2-phenylcarbazole-3-carboxylate, 3-bromoaniline derivative, and 2,5-diphenylbenzoic acid, among others.

Key words

one-pot - organobase-controlled reactions - 3-nitroallylarenes - 2,5-diarylnitrobenzoates - cyclohexenones

Publication History

Received: 01 February 2022

Accepted after revision: 05 April 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
05 April 2022

Article published online:
09 May 2022

• Notes and References

• 1a Zhao Q, Peng C, Zhan G, Han B. RSC Adv. 2020; 10: 40983
• 1b Link A, Sparr C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018; 47: 3804
• 1c van Otterlo WA. L, de Koning CB. Chem. Rev 2009; 109: 3743
• 1d Liu Y, Bakshi K, Zavalij P, Doyle MP. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 4304
• 1e Poudel TN, Lee YR. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 2050
• 1f Joshi PR, Undeela S, Reddy DD, Singarapu KK, Menon RS. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 1449
• 1g Yang S, Lu D, Huo H, Luo F, Gong Y. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 6943
• 1h Swami B, Yadav D, Menon RS. Chem. Rec. 2022; 22: e202100249
• 1i Obydennov DL, Chernyshova EV, Sosnovskikh VY. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 84: 6491
• 2a Taylor RD, MacCoss M, Lawson AD. G. J. Med. Chem. 2014; 57: 5845
• 2b Boström J, Brown DG, Young RJ, Keserü GM. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2018; 17: 709
• 2c The Chemistry of Phenols. Rappoport Z. John Wiley & Sons; New York: 2003
• 2d Hunger K. Industry Dyes: Chemistry, Properties and Applications. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2003
• 2e Lawrence SA. Amines: Synthesis, Properties and Application . Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 2004
• 2f Vogt PF, Gerulis JJ. Amines, Aromatic. In Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2005
• 2g Chemistry of Anilines, Part 1. In Patai Series: The Chemistry of Functional Groups. Rappoport Z. John Wiley & Sons; Chichester: 2007
• 2h Ju K.-S, Parales RE. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010; 74: 250
• 3a Liang K, Lu L, Liu X, Yang D, Wang S, Gao Y, Alhumade H, Yi H, Lei A. ACS Catal. 2021; 11: 14892
• 3b Roglans A, Pla-Quintana A, Solà M. Chem. Rev. 2021; 121: 1894
• 4a Zhou S, Yan B.-W, Fan S.-X, Tian J.-S, Loh T.-P. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 3975
• 4b Liang G, Rong J, Sun W, Chen G, Jiang Y, Loh T.-P. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 7326
• 5 Yin L, Xu M, Wang Y, Xie H, Yuan Y, Wang C, Jiang Y.-Y, Li Y. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 112158
• 6a Anson CW, Stahl SS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 18472
• 6b Liang Y.-F, Li X, Wang X, Zou MC, Tang CH, Liang YJ, Song S, Jiao N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 12271
• 6c Iosub AV, Stahl SS. ACS Catal. 2016; 6: 8201
• 7 Shu W.-M, Zheng K.-L, Ma J.-R, Wu A.-X. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 5216
• 8 Shally IA, Shaw R, Elagamy A, Kumar A, Pratap R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020; 18: 6407
• 9a Feng B, Yang Y, You J. Chem. Sci. 2020; 11: 6031
• 9b Shen N, Zhai S.-J, Cheung CW, Ma J.-A. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 9620
• 9c Okita T, Asahara KK, Muto K, Yamaguchi J. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 3205
• 9d Chen K, Chen W, Han B, Chen W, Liu M, Wu H. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 1841
• 9e Gui J, Pan C.-M, Jin Y, Qin T, Lo JC, Lee BJ, Spergel SH, Mertzman ME, Pitts WJ, La CruzT. E, Schmidt MA, Darvatkar N, Natarajan SR, Baran PS. Science 2015; 348: 886
• 9f Cheung CW, Hu X. Nat. Commun. 2016; 7: 12494
• 9g Cheung CW, Ploeger ML, Hu X. Chem. Sci. 2018; 9: 655
• 9h Muto K, Okita T, Yamagachi J. ACS Catal. 2020; 10: 9856
• 9i Tejedor D, Prieto-Ramírez MC, Ingold M, Chicón M, García-Tellado F. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 2770
• 10a Remennikov GY. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2017; 53: 101
• 10b Fukushi Y, Yoshino H, Ishikawa J, Sagisaka M, Kashiwakura I, Yoshizawa A. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014; 2: 1335
• 10c Olmo AD, Calzada J, Nuñez M. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017; 57: 3084
• 11a Aromatic Nitrations . Schofiled K. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 1980
• 11b Olah GA, Malhotra R, Narang SC. Nitration: Methods and Mechanism . VCH; New York: 1989
• 11c Kulkarni AK. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014; 10: 405
• 12a Fors BP, Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 12898
• 12b Zhang K, Budinská A, Passera A, Katayev D. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 2714
• 12c Calvo R, Zhang K, Passera A, Katayev D. Nat. Commun. 2019; 10: 3410
• 12d Wu X.-F, Schranck J, Neumann H, Beller M. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 12462
• 13a Song L.-R, Fan Z, Zhang A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019; 17: 1351
• 13b Liang Y.-F, Li X, Wang X, Yan Y, Feng P, Jiao N. ACS Catal. 2015; 5: 1956
• 13c Fan Z, Ni J, Zhang A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 8470
• 13d Li Y.-X, Li L.-H, Yang Y.-F, Hua H.-L, Yan X.-B, Zhao L.-B, Zhang J.-B, Ji F.-J, Liang Y.-M. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 9936
• 14a Gupta S, Ansaria A, Sashidhara KV. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019; 60: 151076
• 14b Ravi K, Bankar BD, Jindani S, Biradar AV. ACS Omega 2019; 4: 9453
• 15a McNulty J, Nair JJ, Robertson A. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 4575
• 15b Sharma P, Rohilla S, Jain N. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 1105
• 16a Luo H, Li Y, Du L, Xin X, Wang T, Han J, Tian Y, Li B. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 7883
• 16b Hara H, Hirano M, Tanaka K. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 2537
• 16c Sau MC, Bhattacharjee M. RSC Adv. 2020; 10: 36014
• 16d Kuninobu Y, Nishi M, Kawata A, Takata H, Hanatani Y, Yudha SS, Iwai A, Takai K. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 334
• 16e Kuninobu Y, Nishi M, Yudha S, Takai K. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 3009
• 16f Tsuji H, Yamagata K.-i, Fujimoto T, Nakamura E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 7792
• 17 Yan CG, Song XK, Wang QF, Sun J, Siemeling U, Bruhn C. Chem. Commun. 2008; 1440
• 18 Majee D, Goud SB, Guin S, Rathor SS, Patel AK, Samanta S. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2021; 10: 1650
• 19a Yadav A, Srivastava A, Mobin SM, Samanta S. ChemistrySelect 2019; 4: 858
• 19b Dagar A, Biswas S, Mobin SM, Samanta S. ChemistrySelect 2016; 1: 6362
• 19c Dagar A, Biswas S, Mobin SM, Samanta S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 3326
• 19d Biswas S, Dagar A, Srivastava A, Samanta S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 4493
• 19e Biswas S, Majee D, Dagar A, Samanta S. Synlett 2014; 25: 2115
• 19f Jaiswal PK, Biswas S, Singh S, Samanta S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013; 11: 8410
• 20 Typical Procedure for the Synthesis of Ethyl 5′-Nitro-[1,1′:4′,1′′-terphenyl]-2′-carboxylate (3aa)To a mixture of compounds 1a (32.63 mg, 0.2 mmol) and 2a (51.1 mg, 0.25 mmol) in dry toluene (1.0 mL) was added DBU (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) at room temperature for 30 min, followed by the addition of DBU (0.28 mmol, 1.4 equiv) further. Afterwards, the reaction mixture was heated at 80 °C under air for 12 h. Then, the reaction mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL) before being quenched with a few drops of aqueous HCl. The combined organic phases were washed with brine and dried over Na₂SO₄. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to give the crude residue. Then it was purified through column chromatography over silica gel using ethyl acetate/hexane (1:19) as a mixture of solvent to provide a pure colorless solid 3aa (45.8 mg; 66% yield). The product was characterized by its spectroscopic data (¹H and ¹³C NMR, HRMS); mp 118–120 °C. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.88 (s, 1 H), 7.85 (s, 1 H), 7.48–7.43 (6 H), 7.41–7.34 (m, 4 H), 4.14 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 1.02 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 167.1, 150.1, 142.5, 138.8, 136.2, 135.0, 134.9, 133.3, 129.0, 128.8, 128.6, 128.4, 128.3, 128.0, 125.9, 61.8, 13.7 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C₂₁H₁₇NNaO₄ [M + Na]⁺: 370.1055; found: 370.1057.The above procedure was followed for the access to ethyl 4′′-methoxy-5′-nitro-[1,1′:4′,1′′-terphenyl]-2′-carboxylate (3ac): light yellowish solid; mp 126–128 °C; yield 57% (43.0 mg). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.86 (s, 1 H), 7.79 (s, 1 H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H), 7.36 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H), 6.98 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H), 4.13 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.86 (s, 3 H), 1.01 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 167.2, 160.1, 150.2, 142.0, 138.9, 134.7, 134.5, 133.3, 129.3, 128.5, 128.3, 128.3, 128.2, 125.9, 114.4, 61.8, 55.4, 13.7 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C₂₂H₁₉NNaO₅ [M + Na]⁺: 400.1161; found: 400.1159.
• 21 Representative Procedure for the Synthesis of 4aaTo a stirred solution of 1a (32.63 mg, 0.2 mmol) and 2a (51.1 mg, 0.25 mmol) in dry toluene (1.0 mL) was added DABCO (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) at room temperature for 30 min under air. Afterwards, DABCO (0.28 mmol, 1.4 equiv) was added to the above solution at 60 °C in an open atmosphere for 15 h. Then, the reaction mixture was quenched with a very diluted HCl, followed by the extraction using EtOAc (3 × 10 mL) and dried over Na₂SO₄. After evaporation of the solvent, the crude residue was purified through column chromatography over silica gel using ethyl acetate/hexane (1:15) as a mixture of solvent to provide a pure colorless solid 4aa (45.1 mg, 67% yield); mp 115–117 °C; dr = 91:9; yield 67%. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 7.53 (dd, J = 5.3, 3.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.38–7.35 (m, 5 H), 7.31–7.29 (m, 1 H), 7.22 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 6.40 (s, 1 H), 4.33 (dd, J = 13.5, 4.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.08–4.02 (m, 1 H), 3.95–3.90 (m, 2 H), 2.89 (t, J = 13.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.32 (dd, J = 13.3, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 0.80 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 198.2, 175.1, 154.4, 138.2, 137.5, 129.6, 129.4, 129.0, 128.79, 128.78, 127.4, 126.7, 74.8, 63.0, 48.3, 43.7, 13.5 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C₂₁H₂₀NaO₄ [M + Na]⁺: 359.1259; found: 359.1266.
• 22a Yang X, Wang J, Li P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014; 12: 2499
• 22b Varner MA, Grossman RB. Tetrahedron 1999; 55: 13867
• 22c Klunder AJ. H, Zhu J, Zwanenburg B. Chem. Rev. 1999; 99: 1163
• 22d Sun P, Ao J, Qiao T, Wu S, Liang G. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 11040
• 22e Sun P, Zhang C, Qiao T, Ao J, Wu S, Liang G. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 4848
• 23a Borissov A, Davies TQ, Ellis SR, Fleming TA, Richardson MS. W, Dixon DJ. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016; 45: 5474
• 23b Quintard A, Rodriguez J. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 9523
• 23c Kimaru N, Komatsuki K, Saito K, Yamada T. Chem. Commun. 2021; 57: 6133
• 23d Zhang Q, Zhang F.-M, Zhang C.-S, Liu S.-Z, Tian J.-M, Wang S.-H, Zhang X.-M, Tu Y.-Q. Nat. Commun. 2019; 10: 2507
• 23e Du J.-Y, Zeng C, Han X.-J, Qu H, Zhao X.-H, An X.-T, Fan C.-A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 4267
• 23f Tang L, Luo Y, Xue J.-W, He Y.-H, Guan Z. Tetrahedron 2017; 73: 1114
• 23g Bertuletti S, Bayout I, Bassanini I, Ferrandi EE, Bouzemi N, Monti D, Riva S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 3992
• 23h Golec JC, Carter EM, Ward JW, Whittingham WG, Simón L, Paton RS, Dixon DJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 17417
• 24 Umemiya S, Nishino K, Sato I, Hayashi Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2014; 20: 15753
• 25 Freeman AW, Urvoy M, Criswell ME. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 5014
• 26 Dai J.-J, Xu W.-T, Wu Y.-D, Zhang W.-M, Gong Y, He X.-P, Zhang X.-Q, Xu H.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 80: 911