Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2023; 240(04): 435-439
DOI: 10.1055/a-2013-2329
Klinische Studie

Posterior Corneal Asphericity and the Refractive Outcome after Combined Phacovitrectomy

Posteriore Hornhautasphärizität und das refraktive Ergebnis nach einer kombinierten Phakovitrektomie
Mark Rabinovich
Clinique de lʼOeil Onex, Geneva, Switzerland
,
Jean-Marc Baumgartner
Clinique de lʼOeil Onex, Geneva, Switzerland
,
Jerome Bovet
Clinique de lʼOeil Onex, Geneva, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background We assessed the correlation of posterior corneal asphericity and the refractive prediction error of the SRK-T and Barrett II Universal formulas for eyes following phacovitrectomy with peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM).

Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 41 eyes of 41 patients following a combined phacovitrectomy with ILM peeling. Surgeries were performed by one fellowship-trained vitreoretinal surgeon between 2016 and 2021.

Results Of the 41 patients, 41 eyes were included, with all having at least 1 month of postoperative data. Of the 41 eyes, 19 eyes were female (46%) and 22 were male (54%). The average age of the study population was 77.5 ± 10.7 years. The mean axial length (AL) was 22.7 ± 4.6 mm and the mean anterior chamber depth (ACD) was 3 ± 0.8 mm. The mean posterior Q value was − 0.29 ± 0.27. The mean absolute error (MAE) values 1-month postoperatively for the SRK-T and Barrett II Universal formulas were 0.73 and 0.65, respectively. Regression analysis yielded a significant correlation between posterior corneal asphericity and SRK-T MAE (r = 0.35, R2 = 0.12, p < 0.05) only.

Conclusions Posterior corneal surface asphericity is correlated to the refractive error of the SRK-T formula for eyes following phacovitrectomy.

Zusammenfassung

Wir untersuchten die Korrelation der hinteren Hornhautasphärizität und des refraktiven Vorhersagefehlers der SRK-T und Barrett II Universal Formeln für Augen nach Phakovitrektomie mit Peeling der Membrana limitans interna (ILM).

Die mittleren absoluten Fehler (MAE) 1 Monat postoperativ betrugen für die SRK-T- und Barrett II Universal-Formeln 0,73 bzw. 0,65. Wir fanden eine signifikante Korrelation zwischen der posterioren Hornhautasphärizität und dem SRK-T MAE (r = 0,35, R2 = 0,12, p < 0,05).



Publication History

Received: 04 July 2022

Accepted: 04 January 2023

Article published online:
25 April 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Xiong KE, Li J, Wang N. The analysis of corneal asphericity (Q value) and its related factors of 1,683 Chinese eyes older than 30 years. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0176913
  • 2 Dubbelman M, Sicam VADP, nan der Hejide GL. et al. The shape of the anterior and posterior surface of the aging human cornea. Vision Res 2006; 46: 993-1001
  • 3 Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M. et al. Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39: 598-604
  • 4 Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 368-376
  • 5 Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Barboni P. et al. Influence of corneal asphericity on the refractive outcome of intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 785-789
  • 6 Rabinovich M, Aramburu Del Boz AM, Al-Khatib D. et al. Influence of Posterior Corneal Asphericity on Refractive Error of SRK-T and Barrett Formulas for Lucidis IOL. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2021; DOI: 10.1055/a-1583-9723.
  • 7 Barrett GD. Intraocular lens calculation formulas for new intraocular lens implants. J Cataract Refract Surg 1987; 13: 389-396
  • 8 Melles RB, Holladay JT, William J. et al. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas. Ophthalmology 2018; 125: 169-178
  • 9 Kane JX, Van Heerden A. Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42: 1490-1500
  • 10 Steel DHW. Phacovitrectomy: expanding indications. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 933-936
  • 11 Shi L, Chang J, Suh LH. et al. Differences in refractive outcomes between phacoemulsification for cataract alone and combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane. Retina 2019; 39: 1410-1415
  • 12 Sato T, Korehisa H, Shibata S. et al. Prospective Comparison of Intraocular Lens Dynamics and Refractive Error between Phacovitrectomy and Phacoemulsification Alone. Ophthalmol Retina 2020; 4: 700-707
  • 13 van der Geest LJ, Siemerink MJ, Mura M. et al. Refractive outcomes after phacovitrectomy surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42: 840-845
  • 14 Ercan ZE, Akkoyun İ, Yaman Pınarcı E. et al. Refractive outcome comparison between vitreomacular interface disorders after phacovitrectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017; 43: 1068-1071
  • 15 Liu BS, Cui WN, Niu R. et al. Refractive outcomes after vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification of idiopathic macular holes. Int J Ophthalmol 2021; 14: 250-254
  • 16 Vounotrypidis E, Shajari M, Muth D. et al. Refractive outcomes of 8 biometric formulas in combined phacovitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for epiretinal membrane. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46: 591-597
  • 17 Mehdizadeh M, Nowroozzadeh MH. Postoperative induced myopia in patients with combined vitrectomy and cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 798-799
  • 18 Jeoung JW, Chung H, Yu HG. Factors influencing refractive outcomes after combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 108-114