Indirektes Kleben unter Anwendung von CAD/CAM-Technologie

Zusammenfassung

Digitale Technologien haben zur Entwicklung neuer Ansätze in der indirekten Bracketplatzierung geführt. Dabei kann die Bracketplatzierung virtuell in Softwareprogrammen durchgeführt werden, wobei verschiedene Simulations- und Individualisierungmöglichkeiten angewendet werden können. Anschließend ist eine modellfreie Herstellung der Bracketübertragungsschienen mithilfe von 3D-Druck Verfahren möglich.

Dieser Artikel fasst den Hintergrund und aktuelle Literatur zum CAD/CAM-Indirect-Bonding zusammen und stellt den Arbeitsprozess anhand eines Fallbeispiels dar.

Abstract

Digital technologies have led to the development of new approaches in indirect bracket placement. Bracket placement can be carried out virtually in software, whereby various simulation and customisation options can be used. Subsequently, model-free production of bracket transfer splints is possible using 3D printing processes.

This article summarises the background and current literature on CAD/CAM indirect bonding and presents the work process using a case study.

Schlüsselwörter

Bracket-Position - Indirekt Kleben - CAD/CAM - Digitaler Workflow - Additive Fertigung

Keywords

bracket position - indirect bonding - CAD/CAM - digital workflow - 3D printing

Publication History

Article published online:
02 December 2024

• Literatur

• 1 Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance, origin, controversy, commentary. J Clin Orthod 1976; 10 p 99-114
• 2 Silverman E. et al. A universal direct bonding system for both metal and plastic brackets. Am J Orthod 1972; 62 p 236-244
• 3 Keim RG., Vogels Iii DS, Vogels PB. 2020 JCO Study of Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Procedures Part 1: Results and Trends. J Clin Orthod 2020; 54 p 581-610
• 4 Keim R.G. et al. 2014 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, Part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2014; 48 p 607-630
• 5 Keim RG. et al. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, part 1: results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2008; 42 p 625-640
• 6 Spitz A, Gribel BF, Marassi C. CAD/CAM TECHNOLOGY FOR DIGITAL INDIRECT BONDING. J Clin Orthod 2018; 52 p 621-628
• 7 Brown MW. et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of a CAD/CAM orthodontic bracket system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148 p 1067-1074
• 8 Hoffmann L.. et al. Bracket transfer accuracy with two different three-dimensional printed transfer trays vs silicone transfer trays. Angle Orthod 2022; 92 p 364-371
• 9 Hegele J.. et al. Clinical effects with customized brackets and CAD/CAM technology: a prospective controlled study. Prog Orthod 2021; 22 p 40
• 10 Waldman A, Moshiri M, Bonebreak-Jackson C. Introduction to LightForce. J Clin Orthod 2023; 57 p 500-510
• 11 Jungbauer R. et al. CAD/CAM-gestützte Planung und Übertragungsmöglichkeiten von Brackets und Gaumenimplantaten. Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2020; 52 p 203-209
• 12 Sabbagh H. et al. Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022 11.
• 13 Campobasso A. et al. Transfer Accuracy of 3D-Printed Customized Devices in Digital Indirect Bonding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Dentistry. 2023
• 14 Schmid J. et al. Transfer accuracy of two indirect bonding techniques-an in vitro study with 3D scanned models. Eur J Orthod 2018; 40 p 549-555
• 15 Castilla AE. et al. Measurement and comparison of bracket transfer accuracy of five indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod 2014; 84 p 607-614
• 16 Jungbauer R. et al. Transfer Accuracy of Two 3D Printed Trays for Indirect Bracket Bonding—An In Vitro Pilot Study. Applied Sciences 2021; 11 p 6013
• 17 Palone M. et al. Evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency of fixed orthodontic treatment comparing standard and computer-aided design and manufacturing conventional bracket systems using indirect bonding for both: A retrospective study. J World Fed Orthod 2023; 12 p 251-259
• 18 Sabbagh H. et al. Influence of the design of 3D-printed indirect bonding trays and experience of the clinician on the accuracy of bracket placement. J Orofac Orthop. 2024
• 19 Wajda M, Lis J, Kawala B. Evaluating the accuracy of one-piece and three-piece 3D-printed indirect bonding transfer trays: An in vitro study. Dent Med Probl. 2024
• 20 Czolgosz I, Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. Computer-aided indirect bonding versus traditional direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: bonding time, immediate bonding failures, and cost-minimization. A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2021; 43 p 144-151
• 21 Li B. et al. Does clinical experience affect the bracket bonding accuracy of guided bonding devices in vitro?. Angle Orthod 2024; 94 p 59-67
• 22 Atilla AO. et al. A comparative assessment of orthodontic treatment outcomes using the quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) method between direct bonding and indirect bonding techniques in adolescents: a single-centre, single-blind randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2020; 42 p 441-453
• 23 Çokakoğlu S, Çakır E. Comparison of enamel demineralization and periodontal status between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques : A split-mouth clinical trial of direct vs. digital indirect bonding. J Orofac Orthop. 2023
• 24 Li Y. et al. Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19 p 137
• 25 Bozelli JV. et al. Comparative study on direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques regarding time length and bracket detachment. Dental Press J Orthod 2013; 18 p 51-57
• 26 Schwärzler A. et al. 3D printed indirect bonding trays: Transfer accuracy of hard versus soft resin material in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical study. Dent Mater 2023; 39 p 1058-1065
• 27 Dos Santos AL. et al. Orthodontic bracket bonding techniques and adhesion failures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent 2022; 14 p e746-e755
• 28 Weber DJ. et al. Clinical effectiveness and efficiency of customized vs. conventional preadjusted bracket systems. J Clin Orthod 2013; 47 p 261-266 quiz 268
• 29 Yıldırım K, Saglam-Aydinatay B. Comparative assessment of treatment efficacy and adverse effects during nonextraction orthodontic treatment of Class I malocclusion patients with direct and indirect bonding: A parallel randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 154 p 26-34.e1
• 30 Jungbauer R, Liebermann A, Kieschnick A. et al. Befestigungsmöglichkeiten von Brackets und Attachments in der Kieferorthopädie. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2020; 154 129-135.
• 31 Pamukcu H, Ozsoy OP, Dagalp R. In vitro and in vivo comparison of orthodontic indirect bonding resins: A prospective study. Niger J Clin Pract 2018; 21 614-623.
• 32 Miles PG. Indirect bonding with a flowable light-cured adhesive. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36 p 646-647
• 33 Jungbauer R, Hammer CM, Edelhoff D. et al. Impact of different pretreatments and attachment materials on shear bond strength of indirectly bonded brackets using CAD/CAM transfer trays to monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater 2023; 39 170-180.
• 34 Klocke A. et al. Bond Strength with Custom Base Indirect Bonding Techniques. The Angle Orthodontist 2003; 73 p 176-180
• 35 Paul W. . Bonding techniques in lingual orthodontics. J Orthod 2013; 40 p S20-S26