Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2010; 24(1): 043-056
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253239
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Functional Reconstruction of the Diabetic Foot

Mark W. Clemens1 , Christopher E. Attinger1
  • 1Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 May 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The diabetic triad of neuropathy, vasculopathy, and foot deformity can be surgically challenging to the reconstructive surgeon. Soft tissue deficits must be closed to protect underlying structures from infection and to provide a stable environment for healing. It is critical to have adequate blood flow and to debride the wound to clean healthy tissue before considering reconstruction. Surgical options commonly used include healing by secondary intention, local flap closure, skin grafts, pedicled flaps, and free tissue transfer. Despite a surgeon's best operative efforts, these strategies may fail perioperatively due to postoperative shear forces created by premature joint motion and/or pressure (either weight bearing or decubitus). In the properly selected patient population, external fixators serve as an indispensable adjunct to wound healing in the Charcot foot by providing temporary but reliable offloading and/or immobilization of joints. Using a team approach is critical to the success of diabetic limb reconstruction.

KEYWORDS

Diabetes - reconstructive surgery - neuropathy - lower-extremity flaps

REFERENCES

  • 1 National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Disease. National Diabetes Statistics 2007. Available at: http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/ Accessed September 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 2 American Diabetes Association. American Diabetes Association Statistics 2007. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics/prevalence.jsp Accessed September 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Barie P S, Eachempati S R. Surgical site infections.  Surg Clin North Am. 2005;  85 1115-1135 viii-ix
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 McAlister F A, Man J, Bistritz L, Amad H, Tandon P. Diabetes and coronary artery bypass surgery: an examination of perioperative glycemic control and outcomes.  Diabetes Care. 2003;  26 1518-1524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Neville R F, Attinger C E, Bulan E J, Ducic I, Thomassen M, Sidawy A N. Revascularization of a specific angiosome for limb salvage: does the target artery matter?.  Ann Vasc Surg. 2009;  23 367-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rodeheaver G T. Wound cleansing, wound irrigation, wound disinfection. In: Krasner D, Kane D Chronic Wound Care. 2nd ed. Wayne, PA; Health Management Publication Inc 1997: 97-108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Armstrong D G, Lavery L A, Kimbriel H R, Nixon B P, Boulton A JM. Activity patterns of patients with diabetic foot ulceration: patients with active ulceration may not adhere to a standard pressure off-loading regimen.  Diabetes Care. 2003;  26 2595-2597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Grayson M L, Gibbons G W, Balogh K, Levin E, Karchmer A W. Probing to bone in infected pedal ulcers. A clinical sign of underlying osteomyelitis in diabetic patients.  JAMA. 1995;  273 721-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Attinger C, Cooper P, Blume P, Bulan E. The safest surgical incisions and amputations applying the angiosome principles and using the Doppler to assess the arterial-arterial connections of the foot and ankle.  Foot Ankle Clin. 2001;  6 745-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Adam D J, Beard J D, Cleveland T et al.. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2005;  366 1925-1934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rhodes G R, King T A. Delayed skin oxygenation following distal tibial revascularization (DTR). Implications for wound healing in late amputations.  Am Surg. 1986;  52 519-525
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wolff H, Hansson C. Larval therapy—an effective method of ulcer debridement.  Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003;  28 134-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sherman R A, Sherman J, Gilead L, Lipo M, Mumcuoglu K Y. Maggot débridement therapy in outpatients.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;  82 1226-1229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Armstrong D G, Stacpoole-Shea S, Nguyen H, Harkless L B. Lengthening of the Achilles tendon in diabetic patients who are at high risk for ulceration of the foot.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;  81 535-538
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mueller M J, Sinacore D R, Hastings M K, Strube M J, Johnson J E. Effect of Achilles tendon lengthening on neuropathic plantar ulcers. A randomized clinical trial.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;  85 1436-1445
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Maluf K S, Mueller M J, Strube M J, Engsberg J R, Johnson J E. Tendon Achilles lengthening for the treatment of neuropathic ulcers causes a temporary reduction in forefoot pressure associated with changes in plantar flexor power rather than ankle motion during gait.  J Biomech. 2004;  37 897-906
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Falanga V. Growth factors and chronic wounds: the need to understand the microenvironment.  J Dermatol. 1992;  19 667-672
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Edwards R, Harding K G. Bacteria and wound healing.  Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004;  17 91-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Steed D L, Donohoe D, Webster M W, Lindsley L. Diabetic Ulcer Study Group . Effect of extensive debridement and treatment on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers.  J Am Coll Surg. 1996;  183 61-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Edgerton M T. The Art of Surgical Technique. Baltimore, MD; Williams and Wilkins 1988
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Granick M S, Jacoby M, Noruthrun S. Hydrosurgical debridement on chronic wounds: discussion.  Wounds. 2006;  18 35-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Harding K G, Moore K, Phillips T J. Wound chronicity and fibroblast senescence—implications for treatment.  Int Wound J. 2005;  2 364-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Argenta L C, Morykwas M J. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience.  Ann Plast Surg. 1997;  38 563-576, discussion 577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Armstrong D G, Lavery L A. Diabetic Foot Study Consortium . Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2005;  366 1704-1710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wray J B. Factors in the pathogenesis of nonunion.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1965;  47 168-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mooney V, Ferguson Jr A B. The influence of immobilization and motion on the formation of fibrocartilage in the repair granuloma after joint resection in the rabbit.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;  48 1145-1155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Dendrinos G K, Kontos S, Lyritsis E. Use of the Ilizarov technique for treatment of non-union of the tibia associated with infection.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;  77 835-846
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ghoneem H F, Wright J G, Cole W G, Rang M. The Ilizarov method for correction of complex deformities. Psychological and functional outcomes.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;  78 1480-1485
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Agarwal S, Agarwal R, Jain U K, Chandra R. Management of soft-tissue problems in leg trauma in conjunction with application of the Ilizarov fixator assembly.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  107 1732-1738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Vasconez H C, Nicholls P J. Management of extremity injuries with external fixator or Ilizarov devices. Cooperative effort between orthopedic and plastic surgeons.  Clin Plast Surg. 1991;  18 505-513
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 McKee M D, Yoo D, Schemitsch E H. Health status after Ilizarov reconstruction of post-traumatic lower-limb deformity.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;  80 360-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Parikh P M, Hall M M, Attinger C E, Masden D L, Steinberg J S. External fixation: indications in lower extremity reconstruction and limb salvage.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;  123 160e-161e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sagebien C A, Rodriguez E D, Turen C H. The soft-tissue frame.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  119 2137-2140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Buford G A, Trzeciak M A. A novel method for lower-extremity immobilization after free-flap reconstruction of posterior heel defects.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  111 821-824
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Attinger C E, Cooper P, Blume P, Bulan E. The safest surgical incisions and amputations applying the angiosome principles and using the Doppler to assess the arterial-arterial connections of the foot and ankle.  Foot Ankle Clin. 2001;  6 745-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hallock G G. Distal lower leg local random fasciocutaneous flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;  86 304-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hughes L A, Mahoney J L. Anatomic basis of local muscle flaps in the distal third of the leg.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;  92 1144-1154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Tobin G R. Hemisoleus and reversed hemi-soleus flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;  79 407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Cormack G C, Lamberty B GH. The Arterial Anatomy of Skin Flaps. 2nd ed. London, UK; Churchill Livingstone 1994
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Yoshimura M, Imura S, Shimamura K, Yamauchi S, Nomura S. Peroneal flap for reconstruction in the extremity: preliminary report.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;  74 402-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Dang J S, Peng Y P, Zhang Y X, Lim B H, Pho R W. Reverse anterior tibal flap for reconstruction of foot donar sites.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  116 1604
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hasegawa M, Torii S, Katoh H, Esaki S. The distally based superficial sural artery flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;  93 1012-1020
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Baumeister S P, Spierer R, Erdmann D, Sweis R, Levin L S, Germann G K. A realistic complication analysis of 70 sural artery flaps in a multimorbid patient group.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  112 129-140 discussion 141-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Follmar K E, Baccarani A, Baumeister S P, Levin L S, Erdmann D. The distally based sural flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;  119 138e-148e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Erdmann D, Levin S. Delayed reverse sural flap for staged reconstruction of the foot and lower leg.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  118 571-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Masquelet A C, Beveridge J, Romana C, Gerber C. The lateral supramalleolar flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;  81 74-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Hallock G G. Distal lower leg local random fasciocutaneous flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;  86 304-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Ger R. The management of chronic ulcers of the dorsum of the foot by muscle transposition and free skin grafting.  Br J Plast Surg. 1976;  29 199-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Attinger C E, Ducic I, Cooper P, Zelen C M. The role of intrinsic muscle flaps of the foot for bone coverage in foot and ankle defects in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  110 1047-1054 discussion 1055-1057
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Attinger C E, Cooper P. Soft tissue reconstruction for calcaneal fractures or osteomyelitis.  Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;  32 135-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Leitner D W, Gordon L, Buncke H J. The extensor digitorum brevis as a muscle island flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;  76 777-780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Hartrampf Jr C R, Scheflan M, Bostwick III J. The flexor digitorum brevis muscle island pedicle flap: a new dimension in heel reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;  66 264-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Morrison W A, Crabb D M, O'Brien B M, Jenkins A. The instep of the foot as a fasciocutaneous island and as a free flap for heel defects.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;  72 56-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Harrison D H, Morgan B DG. The instep island flap to resurface plantar defects.  Br J Plast Surg. 1981;  34 315-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Cohen B K, Zabel D D, Newton E D, Catanzariti A R. Soft-tissue reconstruction for recalcitrant diabetic foot wounds.  J Foot Ankle Surg. 1999;  38 388-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Grabb W C, Argenta L C. The lateral calcaneal artery skin flap (the lateral calcaneal artery, lesser saphenous vein, and sural nerve skin flap).  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;  68 723-730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Yanai A, Park S, Iwao T, Nakamura N. Reconstruction of a skin defect of the posterior heel by a lateral calcaneal flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;  75 642-647
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 McCraw J B, Furlow Jr L T. The dorsalis pedis arterialized flap. A clinical study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;  55 177-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Emmett A J. The filleted toe flap.  Br J Plast Surg. 1976;  29 19-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Snyder G B, Edgerton Jr M T. The principle of the island neurovascular flap in the management of ulcerated anesthetic weightbearing areas of the lower extremity.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;  36 518-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Kaplan I. Neurovascular island flap in the treatment of trophic ulceration of the heel.  Br J Plast Surg. 1969;  22 143-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 May Jr J W, Halls M J, Simon S R. Free microvascular muscle flaps with skin graft reconstruction of extensive defects of the foot: a clinical and gait analysis study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;  75 627-641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Christopher E AttingerM.D. 

Director, Wound Healing Center, Professor of Plastic and Orthopaedic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital

3800 Reservoir Road, Washington, DC 20007

Email: cattinger@aol.com

      >