References
1
Basha A.
Lipton M.
Weinreb SM.
Tetrahedron
Lett.
1977,
18:
4171
2
Levin JI.
Turos E.
Weinreb SM.
Synth.
Commun.
1982,
12:
989
3a
Zhou P.
Natale NR.
Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett.
1997,
7:
2455
3b
Gajewski MP.
Beall H.
Schnieder M.
Stranahan SM.
Mosher MD.
Rider KC.
Natale NR.
Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett.
2009,
19:
4067
4a
Wang WB.
Roskamp EJ.
J. Org. Chem.
1992,
57:
6101
4b
Wang WB.
Restituyo JA.
Roskamp EJ.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1993,
34:
7217
4c
Smith LA.
Wang WB.
Barnell-Curty C.
Roskamp EJ.
Synlett
1993,
850
5
Yoon NM.
Sim TB.
Synlett
1994,
827
6
Bradley DC.
Ghotra J.
Hart FA.
J.
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1973,
1021
7
Jingqing R.
Guangxian X.
Sci. Sin., Ser. B
1987,
30:
337
8
Tsay C.
Mankad NP.
Peters JC.
J.
Am. Chem. Soc.
2010,
132:
13975
9
Bochkarev MN.
Fedorova EA.
Radkov YF.
Khorshev SY.
Kalina GS.
Razuvaev GA.
J.
Organomet. Chem.
1983,
258:
C29
10
Bradley DC.
Ghotra J.
Hart FA.
Hursthouse MB.
Raithby PR.
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1977,
1166
11 The lanthanide reagents were prepared
according to the procedure of Bradley et al.6 Briefly,
to a suspension of anhyd lanthanum chloride¹² in
THF at r.t. was added dropwise 3 equiv of LiHMDS (Aldrich) as a
1.0 M solution in THF. Following completion of the addition, the
mixture was warmed to 50 ¡C for 15 min and then
cooled to the prescribed temperature for use in the amidation reactions. Other
lanthanide HMDS complexes were prepared by an analogous procedure.
12a Preparation
of anhyd lanthanide halides can be capricious as cited in ref. 12b.
We found no difference in reactivity of the Ln[HMDS]3 complexes
using lanthanide chlorides prepared by the Taylor procedure compared
with using salts treated by drying of the commercially available
LnCl3×7H2O salts under high vacuum at 140 ˚C
overnight
12b
Taylor MD.
Chem. Rev.
1962,
62:
503
13 Lanthanide triflates have been reported
to promote the addition of amines to nitriles. See: Forsberg JH.
Spaziano VT.
Balasubramanian TM.
Liu GK.
Kinsley SA.
Duckworth CA.
Poteruca JJ.
Brown PS.
Miller JL.
J. Org. Chem.
1987,
52:
1017
14
Sasai H.
Arai S.
Shibasaki M.
J.
Org. Chem.
1994,
59:
2661
15
LeRoux E.
Liang Y.
Storz MP.
Anwander R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010,
132:
16368
16
Johnson CD.
Acc.
Chem. Res.
1993,
26:
476
17a
Burgi HB.
Dunitz JP.
Lehn JM.
Wipff G.
Tetrahedron
1974,
30:
1563
17b
Bartlett GJ.
Choudary A.
Raines RT.
Woolfson DN.
Nat.
Chem. Biol.
2010,
6:
615
18
Procedure for
Conversion of Esters into Amides Using Sm[HMDS]
3
Synthesis
of Amide 4a
Anhyd samarium chloride (0.280 g, 0.73
mmol) was dried under high vacuum at 140 ˚C for
15 h, then cooled to ambient temperature under argon. The residue
was suspended in anhyd THF (4 mL) and LiHMDS (2.2 mL of a 1.0 M
solution in THF, 2.20 mmol) was added dropwise. The suspension was
placed in a 50 ˚C bath and stirred 15 min. The
heating bath was removed and the suspension allowed to cool back
to ambient temperature over 30 min. Morpholine (0.065 mL, 0.73 mmol)
was then added as a neat liquid and the mixture stirred 15 min at
ambient temperature. The reaction flask was placed in an ice-bath
and stirred 15 min to equilibrate. Methyl benzoate (0.082 mL, 0.66
mmol) was added dropwise as a neat liquid, and the reaction was stirred
for 1 h in the ice bath. MeOH (1 mL) was added to quench the reaction.
The mixture was poured directly onto a short plug of silica gel
using EtOAc washes (5 ¥ 5 mL) for elution.
The combined extracts were concentrated, and the residual green
oil was chromatographed [Chromatotron radial chromatography,
silica gel, elution solvent EtOAc-hexanes (1:5)].
The combined eluent was concentrated to provide 0.126 g of a clear,
colorless oil (ca. 99% yield). ¹H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.33
(br s, 4 H), 3.59 (br s, 4 H), 7.387.46 (m, 5 H). ¹³C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 40.31, 66.04,
126.97, 128.41, 129.55, 135.57, 166.90. MS: m/z = 192 [M+].
19 Most of the products are simple amides
previously described in the literature and/or commercially
available. Thus, products were characterized by NMR (¹H, ¹³C)
and MS comparing data to authentic samples or data acquired from the
literature.
Selected Examples with
Data
N
-Benzylbenzamide (4b)
¹H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.48
(d, 2 H, J = 6.02
Hz), 7.23 (m, 1 H), 7.31 (m, 4 H), 7.51 (m, 3 H), 7.88 (m, 2 H), 9.04
(t, 1 H, J = 5.70
Hz). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 42.59,
126.73, 127.19, 127.25, 128.29, 128.33, 131.26, 134.33, 139.72,
166.19. MS: m/z = 212 [M+].²0a
(4-Bromophenyl)(morpholino)methanone (4e)
¹H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.49
(br s, 4 H), 3.58 (br s, 4 H), 7.36 (d, 2 H, J = 8.68),
7.64 (d, 2 H, J = 8.58). ¹³C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 66.03,
122.99, 129.29, 131.47, 134.75, 168.09.²0b
(4-Methoxyphenyl)(morpholino)methanone (4f)
¹H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.48
(br s, 4 H), 3.82 (br s, 4 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H), 6.98 (d, 2 H, J = 6.68 Hz),
7.38 (d, 2 H, J = 6.76). ¹³C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 55.25,
66.11, 113.66, 127.47, 129.13, 160.24, 169.02. MS: m/z = 206 [M+].²0c
Morpholino(pyridin-3-yl)methanone (4h)
¹H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.64
(br s, 8 H), 7.49 (m, 1 H), 7.85 (m, 1 H), 8.64 (m, 2 H). ¹³C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 66.04,
123.59, 131.48, 134.96, 147.76, 150.55, 166.90. MS: m/z = 192 [M+].²0d
20a
Ren W.
Yamane M.
J.
Org. Chem.
2010,
75:
3017
20b
Li J.
Xu F.
Zhang Y.
Shen Q.
J. Org. Chem.
2009,
74:
2575
20c
Tillack A.
Rudloff I.
Beller M.
Eur.
J. Org. Chem.
2001,
523
20d
Deguest G.
Devineau A.
Bischoff L.
Fruit C.
Marsais F.
Org.
Lett.
2006,
8:
5889