Synlett 2012; 23(15): 2189-2194
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1290454
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Regiospecific Normal Diels–Alder Reaction of trans-1,2-Biscoumarinylethenes

Kailas K. Sanap
Department of Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Technology, N. Parekh Marg, Matunga, Mumbai 400 019, India, Fax: +91(22)33611020   Email: samantsd@yahoo.com   Email: sd.samant@ictmumbai.edu.in
,
Shriniwas D. Samant*
Department of Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Technology, N. Parekh Marg, Matunga, Mumbai 400 019, India, Fax: +91(22)33611020   Email: samantsd@yahoo.com   Email: sd.samant@ictmumbai.edu.in
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 07 May 2012

Accepted after revision: 27 June 2012

Publication Date:
21 August 2012 (online)


Abstract

The reaction of different 7,8-substituted coumarin 4-acetic acids with 7-diethylaminocoumarin-3-carbaldehyde in the presence of piperidine in methanol gives 1,2-biscoumarinylethenes. These compounds undergo regiospecific Diels–Alder reactions at their electron-rich diene components C3–C4–C10–C9, with electron-deficient dienophiles. The feasibility of normal electron-demand Diels–Alder reactions could be explained on the basis of the HOMO–LUMO gap. All the compounds are new and are intensely colored.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 2 Rastogi RP, Mehrotra BN In Compendium of Indian Medicinal Plants . Vol. 3. Rastogi RP. Central Drug Research Institute and Publications and Information Directorate; Lucknow/New Delhi: 1993: 273
  • 3 Izquierdo ME. F, Granados JQ, Mir VM, Martinez MC. L. Food Chem. 2000; 70: 251
  • 4 Kuznetsova NA, Kaliya OL. Usp. Khim. 1992; 61: 1243
  • 13 Wu J.-S, Liu W.-M, Zhuang X.-Q, Wang F, Wang P.-F, Tao S.-L, Zhang X.-H, Wu S, Lee S.-T. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 33
  • 14 Laskowski SC, Clinton RO. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950; 72: 3987
  • 15 Soliman AY, El-Kafrawy AF, Mohamed FK, Baker HM, Abdel-Gawad AM. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B: Org. Chem. Incl. Med. Chem. 1991; 30: 477
  • 16 Kudale AA, Kendall J, Miller DO, Collins JL, Bodwell GJ. J. Org. Chem. 2008; 73: 8437
  • 17 Experimental Procedure for 3a Compound 2a (0.218 g, 1 mmol) and piperidine (0.085 g, 1 mmol) were stirred in MeOH (6 mL) for 15 min and 1 (0.245 g, 1 mmol) was added slowly at r.t. After complete consumption of 1, the precipitated solid was collected by filtration and washed with a small quantity of cold MeOH followed by H2O to remove traces of piperidine. Solid 3a was washed with EtOAc. The second crop of 3a was obtained from the filtrate; the filtrate was evaporated to obtain a sticky mass which was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using toluene–EtOAc (70:30, v/v); orange solid; 64% yield; mp 231–233 °C. IR (neat): ν = 1698, 1609, 1575, 1513, 1352, 1252, 1192, 1132 cm–1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.25 (t, 6 H, 2 × CH3, J = 7.5 Hz), 2.46 (s, 3 H, CH3), 3.47 (q, 4 H, 2 × CH2, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.49 (s, 1 H, C3H), 6.51 (d, 1 H, C8′H, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.65 (dd, 1 H, C6′H, J = 2.0, 9.0 Hz), 7.13–7.15 (m, 2 H, C5′H and C8H), 7.20 (d, 1 H, C10H, J = 15.5 Hz), 7.37 (d, 1 H, C6H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.77 (d, 1 H, C5H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.79 (s, 1 H, C4′H), 7.99 (d, 1 H, C9H, J = 15.5 Hz). MS: m/z = 402.57 [M + 1]. Anal. Calcd (%) for C25H23NO4 (401.45): C, 74.79; H, 5.77; N, 3.49. Found: C, 74.58; H, 5.88; N, 3.52.
  • 18 Experimental Procedure for 16a Compound 3a (0.401 g, 1 mmol) and 11 (0.256 g, 2 mmol) were refluxed in dioxane (6 mL) for 2 h. After complete consumption of 3a, the solution was cooled to r.t. and was evaporated to obtain a sticky mass which was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using toluene–EtOAc (80:20, v/v); buff solid; 85% yield; mp 269–270 °C. IR (neat): δ = 2975, 1702, 1594, 1519, 1251, 1128 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.23 (t, 6 H, 2 × CH3, J = 6.9 Hz), 2.50 (s, 3 H, CH3), 3.50 (q, 4 H, 2 × CH2, J = 6.9 Hz), 3.59 (d, 2 H, C10H, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.29 (t, 1 H, C9H, J = 7.2 Hz), 6.44 (d, 1 H, C8′H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.64 (dd, 1 H, C6′H, J = 2.1, 8.7 Hz), 7.22 (s, 1 H, C8H), 7.24 (d, 1 H, C6H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.38 (d, 1 H, C5′H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.58 (d, 1 H, C5H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.93 (s, 1 H, C4′H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 12.4 (2 × CH3), 22.0 (ArCH3), 28.3 (C10), 36.9 (C9), 42.3 (C8), 45.1 (2 × CH2), 46.5 (C7), 97.0 (C8′), 107.5 (C3′), 108.9 (CN), 109.2 (CN), 109.4 (C10b), 109.7 (2 × CN), 109.8 (C6′), 111.6 (C4a′), 114.6 (C6a), 117.7 (C4), 124.8 (C2), 127.2 (C1), 130.1 (C5′), 142.8 (C4′), 147.4 (C3), 152.0 (C7′), 152.3 (C10a), 152.9 (C4a′), 156.5 (C8a′), 157.1 (C2′), 161.5 (C6). MS: m/z = 530.46 [M + 1]. Anal. Calcd (%) for C31H23N5O4 (529.55): C, 70.31; H, 4.38; N, 13.23. Found: C, 70.48; H, 4.47; N, 13.19.