The Effect of Turbo Trainer Cycling on Pedalling Technique and Cycling Efficiency

Abstract

Cycling can be performed on the road or indoors on stationary ergometers. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in cycling efficiency, muscle activity and pedal forces during cycling on a stationary turbo trainer compared with a treadmill. 19 male cyclists cycled on a stationary turbo trainer and on a treadmill at 150, 200 and 250 W. Cycling efficiency was determined using the Douglas bags, muscle activity patterns were determined using surface electromyography and pedal forces were recorded with instrumented pedals. Treadmill cycling induced a larger muscular contribution from Gastrocnemius Lateralis, Biceps Femoris and Gluteus Maximus of respectively 14%, 19% and 10% compared with turbo trainer cycling (p<0.05). Conversely, Turbo trainer cycling induced larger muscular contribution from Vastus Lateralis, Rectus Femoris and Tibialis Anterior of respectively 7%, 17% and 14% compared with treadmill cycling (p<0.05). The alterations in muscle activity resulted in a better distribution of power during the pedal revolution, as determined by an increased Dead Centre size (p<0.05). Despite the alterations in muscle activity and pedalling technique, no difference in efficiency between treadmill (18.8±0.7%) and turbo trainer (18.5±0.6%) cycling was observed. These results suggest that cycling technique and type of ergometer can be altered without affecting cycling efficiency.

Key words

ergometry - treadmill - electromyography - pedal forces - muscle activity

• References

• 1 Atkinson G, Batterham AM. The use of ratios and percentage change in sports medicine: Time for a rethink?. Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 505-506
• 2 Bertucci W, Duc S, Villerius V, Pernin JN, Grappe F. Validity and reliability of the PowerTap mobile cycling powermeter when compared with the SRM Device. Int J Sports Med 2005; 26: 868-873
• 3 Bertucci W, Grappe F, Groslambert A. Laboratory versus outdoor cycling conditions: differences in pedaling biomechanics. J Appl Biomech 2007; 23: 87-92
• 4 Blake O, Wakeling JM. Muscle coordination during an outdoor cycling time trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 938-948
• 5 Blake OM, Champoux Y, Wakeling JM. Muscle coordination patterns for efficient cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc
• 6 Brown DA, Kautz SA, Dairagh CA. Muscle activity patterns altered during pedaling at different body orientations. J Biomech 1996; 29: 1349-1356
• 7 Chapman AR, Vicenzino B, Blanch P, Hodges PW. Patterns of leg muscle recruitment vary between novice and highly trained cyclists. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2008; 18: 359-371
• 8 Coleman DA, Wiles JD, Davison R, Smith MF, Swaine IL. Power output measurement during treadmill cycling. Int J Sports Med 2007; 28: 525-530
• 9 Dorel S, Couturier A, Hug F. Intra-session repeatability of lower limb muscles activation pattern during pedaling. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2008; 18: 857-865
• 10 Duc S, Bouteille T, Bertucci W, Pernin J, Grappe F. Comparaison de l’activité EMG du pédalage entre un exercice réalisé sur ergomètre stationnaire et sur tapis roulant motorisé. Sci Sports 2006; 21: 309-312
• 11 Elmer SJ, Barratt P, Korff T. Joint-specific power production during submaximal and maximal cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 1940-1947
• 12 Ettema G, Lorås HW. Efficiency in cycling: a review. Eur J Appl Physiol 2009; 106: 1-14
• 13 Hansen EA, Jørgensen LV, Jensen K, Fregly BJ, Sjøgaard G. Crank inertial load affects freely chosen pedal rate during cycling. J Biomech 2002; 35: 277-285
• 14 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
• 15 Hermens H, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000; 10: 361-374
• 16 Hopker JG, Jobson SA, Gregson H, Coleman DA, Passfield L. The reliability of cycling gross efficiency using the Douglas bag method. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 290-296
• 17 Hug F, Dorel S. Electromyographic analysis of pedaling: a review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009; 19: 182-198
• 18 Hug F, Turpin NA, Guével A, Dorel S. Is interindividual variability of EMG patterns in trained cyclists related to different muscle synergies?. J Appl Physiol 2010; 108: 1727-1736
• 19 Jeukendrup AE, Craig NP, Hawley JA. The bioenergetics of world class cycling. J Sci Med Sport 2000; 3: 414-433
• 20 Korff T, Romer L, Mayhew I. Effect of pedaling technique on mechanical effectiveness and efficiency in cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 991-995
• 21 Lay B, Sparrow WA, Hughes K, O’Dwyer N. Practice effects on coordination and control, metabolic energy expenditure, and muscle activation. Hum Mov Sci 2002; 21: 807-830
• 22 Leirdal S, Ettema G. Pedaling technique and energy cost in cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 701-705
• 23 Leirdal S, Ettema G. The relationship between cadence, pedalling technique and gross efficiency in cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 2885-2893
• 24 McDaniel J, Subudhi A, Martin JC. Torso stabilization reduces the metabolic cost of producing cycling power. Can J Appl Physiol 2005; 30: 433-441
• 25 Mileva K, Turner D. Neuromuscular and biomechanical coupling in human cycling: adaptations to changes in crank length. Exp Brain Res 2003; 152: 393-403
• 26 Millet GP, Vleck VE, Bentley DJ. Physiological requirements in triathlon. J Hum Sport Exerc 2011; 6: 184-204
• 27 Passfield L, Doust JH. Changes in cycling efficiency and performance after endurance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 1935-1941
• 28 Peiffer JJ, Losco B. Reliability/validity of the Fortius trainer. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 353-356
• 29 Peronnet F, Massicotte D. Table of nonprotein respiratory quotient: an update. Can J Sport Sci 1991; 16: 23-29
• 30 So RCH, Ng JKF, Ng GYF. Muscle recruitment pattern in cycling: a review. Phys Ther Sport 2005; 6: 89-96
• 31 Stapelfeldt B, Mornieux G, Oberheim R, Belli A, Gollhofer A. Development and evaluation of a new bicycle instrument for measurements of pedal forces and power output in cycling. Int J Sports Med 2007; 28: 326-332