Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000083.xml
Synlett 2015; 26(06): 815-819
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1379986
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1379986
letter
The Synthesis of 5,5-Disubstituted Piperidinones via a Reductive Amination–Lactamization Sequence: The Formal Synthesis of (±)-Quebrachamine
Further Information
Publication History
Received: 08 October 2014
Accepted after revision: 18 December 2014
Publication Date:
05 February 2015 (online)
Abstract
A preliminary investigation into the prospect of a common synthetic intermediate for the synthesis of a variety of indole alkaloids has led to a synthesis of substituted piperidinones and the corresponding piperidines. These common natural product cores are accessed via a reductive amination–lactamization sequence of dimethyl 3-ethyl-3-formylpimelate. The synthetic utility of this initial study has been displayed in the formal synthesis of (±)-quebrachamine.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1379986.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Ghavimi B, Mangus P. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 1708
- 1b Bradshaw B, Luque-Corredera C, Bonjoch J. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 7099
- 1c Teng M, Zi W, Ma D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 1814
- 1d Itoh N, Iwata T, Sugihara H, Inagaki F, Mukai C. Chem. Eur. J. 2013; 19: 8665
- 1e Kress S, Weckesser J, Schulz S, Blechert S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 1346
- 2a Kam TS, Tee YM, Subramaniam G. Nat. Prod. Lett. 1998; 12: 307
- 2b Abe F, Yamauchi T. Phytochemistry 1994; 35: 169
- 2c Linde H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1965; 48: 1822
- 2d Abraham D, Rosenstein R, Lyon R, Fong H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972; 13: 909
- 2e Motegi M, Nugroho A, Hirasawa Y, Arai T, Hadi A, Morita H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 1227
- 3a Karadoelian A, Kerr M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 1133
- 3b Carson C, Kerr M. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 777
- 3c Leduc A, Kerr M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 7945
- 3d Magolan J, Carson C, Kerr M. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 1437
- 3e Johansen M, Leduc A, Kerr M. Synlett 2007; 2593
- 3f Young I, Kerr M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 1465
- 3g Leduc A, Kerr M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 2: 237
- 3h Carson C, Kerr M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 6560
- 4a Nemes A, Szantay C, Czibula L, Greiner I. ARKIVOC 2008; 154
- 4b Amat M, Bassas O, Llor N, Canto M, Perez M, Molins E, Bosch J. Chem. Eur. J. 2006; 12: 7672
- 4c Amat M, Canto M, Llor N, Ponzo V, Perez M, Bosch J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002; 21: 335
- 4d Szabo L, Szentirmay E, Baitz-Gacs E, Kalaus G, Szantay C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997; 38: 115
- 4e Alazard J.-P, Terrier C, Thal C. Tetrahedron 1994; 50: 6287
- 4f Carite C, Alazard J.-P, Ogino K, Thal C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990; 31: 7011
- 4g Castedo L, Harley-Mason J, Kaplan M. Chem. Commun. 1969; 1444
- 4h Kuehne M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964; 86: 2946
- 5a Laronze P, Laronze-Fontaine J, Levy J, Le Men J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974; 491
- 5b Giri V, Ali E, Parkashi S. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1980; 17: 1133
- 6a Smith G, Wahid M. J. Chem. Soc. 1963; 4002
- 6b Hava H. The Vinca Alkaloids . Taylor W, Farnsworth N. Marcel Dekker; New York: 1973. Chap. 6
- 6c Rahman A, Malik S. J. Nat. Prod. 1985; 48: 153
- 6d Lim K.-H, Kam T.-S. Helv. Chim. Acta 2007; 90: 31
- 7a Desmaele D, D’Angelo J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990; 31: 883
- 7b Desmaele D, D’Angelo J. J. Org. Chem. 1994; 59: 2292
- 7c Magnus P, Brown P. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985; 184
- 8 Sequential additions of sodium borohydride in between reflux periods are required to ensure complete conversion. See experimental for details.
- 9 Excess sodium borohydride is used. See experimental for details.
- 10 Hesse O. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1881; 13: 2308
- 11a Joule J. The Alkaloids . Vol. 1. Saxton J. The Chemical Society; London: 1971: 178
- 11b Deutsch H, Evenson M, Drescher P, Sparwasser C, Madsen P. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1994; 12: 1283
- 12 All attempts at a one-pot Larock-type indole synthesis resulted in significantly lower yields of the desired product. In most cases increased reaction times were required.
- 13 Bajtos B, Pagenkopf B. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 1072
- 14 General Experimental Procedure for the Synthesis of Piperidinones 3a–i Compound 2 (1 equiv) and primary amine (1 equiv) were dissolved in MeOH. Sc(OTf)3 (0.025 equiv) was then added, and the mixture was stirred for 1–2 h, followed by the addition of NaBH4 (1.25 equiv). Upon completion by TLC analysis H2O was added to the reaction mixture and extracted 3 times with EtOAc. The organic layer was dried, and the solvent was removed. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc–hexanes) to yield the desired piperidinones 3a–i. Piperidinone 3c Yellow oil, 76% yield (346 mg, 0.93 mmol). Rf = 0.27, EtOAc. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.76 (dd, J = 5.9, 5.9 Hz, 2 H), 3.67 (s, 3 H), 3.49–3.40 (m, 2 H), 3.18 (AB system, 2 H), 2.35 (dd, J = 7.0, 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 2.25–2.22 (m, 2 H), 1.75–1.66 (m, 2 H), 1.63–1.55 (m, 2 H), 1.44–1.38 (m, 1 H), 1.36–1.30 (m, 1 H), 0.89 (s, 9 H), 0.84 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3 H), 0.05 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.8, 169.6, 61.6, 58.9, 51.7, 50.5, 34.5, 29.7, 28.9, 28.5, 28.3, 26.9, 25.8, 18.1, 7.4, –5.5. IR (thin film): 2930, 2858, 1740, 1646, 1493, 1470, 1436, 1363, 1256, 1105, 1054, 1006, 921, 837, 778 cm–1. HRMS: m/z calcd for C19H37NO4Si [M + 1]: 372.2565; found: 372.2565. Piperidinone 3e Orange oil, 81% yield (202 mg, 0.67 mmol). Rf = 0.28, EtOAc. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.32–7.30 (m, 2 H), 7.27–7.24 (m, 3 H), 4.57 (AB system, 2 H), 3.65 (s, 3 H), 2.91 (AB system, 2 H), 2.46 (dd, J = 7.0, 1.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.18–2.12 (m, 1 H), 2.04–1.98 (m, 1 H), 1.63–1.59 (m, 4 H), 1.33–1.22 (m, 2 H), 0.71 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.7, 169.5, 137.1, 128.6, 128.3, 127.5, 55.4, 51.7, 50.3, 34.3, 30.0, 28.9, 28.5, 28.2, 26.5, 7.2. IR (thin film): 3454, 3056, 3062, 3029, 2948, 1736, 1647, 1494, 1454, 1363, 1229, 1069, 1002, 854, 703 cm–1. HRMS: m/z calcd for C18H25NO3 [M]: 303.1834; found: 303.1825. General Experimental Procedure for the Synthesis of 5-(3-Hydroxypropyl)piperidin-2-one 4a–c Procedure 1 Piperidinone (1 equiv) was dissolved in MeOH, followed by the addition of NaBH4 (5 equiv). The mixture was heated to reflux for 10 min and then cooled to r.t. Then additional NaBH4 (5 equiv) was added followed by a 10 min reflux period, this process was continued until a total of 40 equiv NaBH4 was added. Upon complete addition of NaBH4, H2O was slowly added to the reaction mixture and extracted 3 times with EtOAc. The organic layer was dried, and the solvent was removed. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc–hexanes) to yield the desired piperidinones 4a–c. Procedure 2 Dimethyl 3-ethyl-3-formylpimelate (1 equiv) and primary amine (1 equiv) were dissolved in MeOH. Sc(OTf)3 (0.025 equiv) was then added, and the mixture was stirred for 1–2 h, followed by the addition of NaBH4 (5 equiv). The mixture was heated to reflux for 10 min and then cooled to r.t. Then additional NaBH4 (5 equiv) was added followed by a 10 min reflux period, this process was continued until a total of 40 equiv NaBH4 was added. Upon complete addition of NaBH4, H2O was slowly added to the reaction mixture and extracted 3 times with EtOAc. The organic layer was dried and the solvent was removed. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc–hexanes) to yield the desired piperidinones 4a–c. 5-(3-Hydroxypropyl)piperidin-2-one 4a Thick yellow oil, 99% yield (630 mg, 1.81 mmol). Rf = 0.14, EtOAc. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.71 (dd, J = 5.3, 5.3 Hz, 2 H), 3.56 (dd, J = 5.9, 5.9 Hz, 2 H), 3.46–3.42 (m, 1 H), 3.37–3.33 (m, 1 H), 3.14 (AB system, 2 H), 2.47 (br s, 1 H), 2.29 (dd, J = 7.0, 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 1.55 (dd, J = 7.0, 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 1.46–1.34 (m, 4), 1.33–1.26 (m, 2 H), 0.84 (s, 9 H), 0.79 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3 H), 0.00 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 170.1, 62.9, 61.4, 59.3, 50.5, 34.5, 30.0, 29.8, 28.5, 27.1, 26.2, 25.8, 18.1, 7.4, –5.5. IR (thin film): 2930, 2858, 1626, 1497, 1464, 1418, 1362, 1255, 1101, 1058, 837, 778 cm–1. HRMS: m/z calcd for C18H37NO3Si [M + 1]: 344.2622; found: 344.2615. 5-(3-Hydroxypropyl)piperidin-2-one 4c Dark yellow oil, 100% yield (1459 mg, 5.30 mmol). Rf = 0.14, EtOAc; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.32–7.30 (m, 2 H), 7.27–7.24 (m, 3 H), 4.55 (AB system, 2 H), 3.51 (dd, J = 5.9, 5.9 Hz, 2 H), 2.92 (AB system, 2 H), 2.43 (dd, J = 7.0, 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 1.62 (m, 3 H), 1.43–1.35 (m, 1 H), 1.34–1.16 (m, 5 H), 0.71 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 169.8, 137.3, 128.5, 128.3, 127.4, 63.1, 55.7, 50.3, 34.3, 30.2, 29.9, 28.5, 26.9, 26.2, 7.3. IR (thin film): 3395, 2939, 2866, 1620, 1496, 1454, 1419, 1363, 1308, 1229, 1067, 1028, 703 cm–1. HRMS: m/z calcd for C17H25NO2 [M]: 275.1885; found: 275.1880. General Experimental Procedure for the Synthesis of Piperidines 5a,b Piperidinone (1 equiv) was dissolved in THF followed by the addition of Red-Al® (65% by weight; 4 equiv). Upon completion by TLC analysis H2O was added to the reaction mixture and extracted 3 times with EtOAc. The organic layer was dried and the solvent was removed. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc–hexanes) to yield the desired product 5a,b. Piperidine 5a Orange oil, 72% yield (160 mg, 0.49 mmol). Rf = 0.11, EtOAc. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.71 (dd, J = 6.5, 6.5 Hz, 2 H), 3.61 (ddd, J = 6.5, 6.5, 2.3 Hz, 2 H), 2.51–2.39 (m, 3 H), 2.31–2.19 (m, 2 H), 2.08–2.04 (m, 1 H), 1.61–1.50 (m, 2 H), 1.49–1.37 (m, 3 H), 1.36–1.25 (m, 4 H), 1.20–1.16 (m, 1 H), 0.88 (s, 9 H), 0.77 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 0.05 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 63.8, 63.6, 61.3, 61.2, 55.4, 35.3, 33.6, 28.3, 25.9, 21.9, 18.3, 7.3, 5.3 (missing 2 carbons, presumably due to overlap). IR (thin film): 2933, 2857, 1463, 1255, 1103, 1068, 836, 776 cm–1. HRMS: m/z calcd for C18H39NO2Si [M]: 329.2750; found: 329.2754.
Selected recently total synthesis of piperidine containing target molecules:
For selected examples of indole alkaloids, see:
For selected uses in synthesis, see: