Download PDF
Z Orthop Unfall 2015; 153(2): 206-208
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1545807
Aus den Sektionen – AE Deutsche Gesellschaft für Endoprothetik
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Rotationsbestimmung der Femurkomponente – Wie mache ich das?

How to Determine the Rotation of the Femoral Component
G. Matziolis
Klinik für Orthopädie, Waldkrankenhaus „Rudolf Elle“, Eisenberg
,
E. Roehner
Klinik für Orthopädie, Waldkrankenhaus „Rudolf Elle“, Eisenberg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 April 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Es werden die unterschiedlichen Landmarken zur Bestimmung der Rotation des Femurteils dargestellt und ihre jeweiligen Vor- und Nachteile aufgezeigt. Die Videos demonstrieren das intraoperative Auffinden der Landmarken.

Abstract

The different landmarks for determination of the rotation of the femoral component are shown and specific pros and cons are discussed. The videos demonstrate how to identify them intraoperatively.

Schlüsselwörter

Knietotalendoprothetik - Rotation Femurkomponente - Landmarken

Key words

total knee arthroplasty - femoral component rotation - landmarks
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Incavo SJ, Wild JJ, Coughlin KM et al. Early revision for component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 458: 131-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Boldt JG, Stiehl JB, Hodler J et al. Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2006; 30: 420-425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hofmann S, Romero J, Roth-Schiffl E et al. [Rotational malalignment of the components may cause chronic pain or early failure in total knee arthroplasty]. Orthopade 2003; 32: 469-476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ et al. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 392: 46-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ et al. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 356: 144-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Brooks P. Seven cuts to the perfect total knee. Orthopedics 2009; 32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Asada S, Akagi M, Matsushita T et al. Effects of cartilage remnants of the posterior femoral condyles on femoral component rotation in varus knee osteoarthritis. Knee 2012; 19: 185-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fujii T, Kondo M, Tomari K et al. Posterior condylar cartilage may distort rotational alignment of the femoral component based on posterior condylar axis in total knee arthroplasty. Surg Radiol Anat 2012; 34: 633-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Tashiro Y, Uemura M, Matsuda S et al. Articular cartilage of the posterior condyle can affect rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20: 1463-1469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Laskin RS. Instrumentation pitfalls: you just canʼt go on autopilot!. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 18-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R et al. Anatomical analysis of the femoral condyle in normal and osteoarthritic knees. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 104-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Akagi M, Yamashita E, Nakagawa T et al. Relationship between frontal knee alignment and reference axes in the distal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 388: 147-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jenny JY, Boeri C. Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75: 74-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Matziolis G, Krocker D, Tohtz S et al. [Variance of identification of femoral epicondyles in navigated total knee arthroplasty]. Orthopade 2006; 35: 848-852
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B et al. Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2002; 10: 194-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB et al. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 444: 184-192
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Heyse TJ, Tibesku CO. Improved femoral component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation. Knee 2014; 21: 268-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Whiteside LA, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 321: 168-172
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Middleton FR, Palmer SH. How accurate is Whitesideʼs line as a reference axis in total knee arthroplasty?. Knee 2007; 14: 204-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Classen T, Wegner A, Müller RD et al. [Accuracy of rotational positioning of the femoral component using the tibial-cut-first technique]. Z Orthop Unfall 2011; 149: 626-629
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Heesterbeek PJC, Jacobs WCH, Wymenga AB. Effects of the balanced gap technique on femoral component rotation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 1015-1022
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Talbot S, Bartlett J. The anterior surface of the femur as a new landmark for femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16: 258-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Moyad TF, Hughes RE, Urquhart A. “Grand piano sign,” a marker for proper femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 2011; 40: 348-352
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Cui WQ, Won YY, Baek MH et al. Variations of the “grand-piano sign” during total knee replacement. A computer-simulation study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 1441-1447
    PubMedGoogle Scholar