Synlett 2020; 31(04): 339-342
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1610745
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Syntheses of cis- and trans-Jamtine and Their N-Oxides via a Benzyl Configuration-Inversion Approach

,
Zhengshen Wang
,
Yujie Li
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Natural Products and Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, P. R. of China   Email: hjzheng@nwsuaf.edu.cn
,
Qiang Zhang
,
Jin-Ming Gao
,
Huaiji Zheng
› Author Affiliations
We are grateful for generous financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21702167 to Z.L., 21772156 and 21502151 to H.Z., and 21702168 to Z.W.) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (S2016YFJQ0080 to Z.L.).
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 22 November 2019

Accepted after revision: 20 December 2019

Publication Date:
28 January 2020 (online)


These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

A novel synthesis of the tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloid jamtine and its epimer is reported. The synthetic strategy hinges on a one-pot conjugate reduction/Robinson cyclization sequence and an efficient benzyl configuration inversion by an oxidation/reduction approach. The N-oxide derivatives of the jamtine isomers were also synthesized and identified by X-ray crystallographic analysis. Additionally, a density functional theory calculation for the four possible N-oxide structures was exploited to gain further insight into the structure of the natural product in comparison to those of the synthetic N-oxides, because the NMR data of the synthetic derivatives did not match those reported for natural jamtine N-oxide.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 3 Rao KV. J, Rao LR. C. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 1981; 20B: 125
  • 4 Badole S, Patel N, Bodhankar S, Jain B, Bhardwaj S. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2006; 38: 49
  • 5 Ahmad VU, Iqbal S. Nat. Prod. Lett. 1993; 2: 105
  • 6 Rasheed T, Khan MN. I, Zhadi SS. A, Durrani S. J. Nat. Prod. 1991; 54: 582
  • 7 Ahmad VU, Iqbal S. Phytochemistry 1993; 33: 735
  • 9 Sano T, Toda J, Kashiwaba N, Ohshima T, Tsuda Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1987; 35: 479
  • 13 The conformational research was carried out using DFT method in Gaussian 09 software (for details see the Supporting Information).
  • 14 Methyl cis-2,3-Dimethoxy-5,8,10,11,12,12b-hexahydroisoindolo[1,2-a]isoquinoline-12a(6H)-carboxylate (cis-Jamtine) (6) To a solution of cis- 13 (355 mg, 0.82 mmol) in absolute EtOH (10 mL) was added excess Raney-Ni (W-2 type, newly reactivated), and the mixture was vigorously stirred at rt for 2 h. The mixture was then filtered through a plug of Celite that was washed with EtOAc. The filtrate was concentrated, and the residue was purified by chromatography [silica gel, CH2Cl2–MeOH (50:1)] to give a white solid; yield: 218 mg (77%); mp 95.2–98.0 °C.1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.98 (s, 1 H), 6.56 (s, 1 H), 5.70 (s, 1 H), 4.36 (s, 1 H), 3.88 (s, 3 H), 3.90–3.82 (m, 1 H), 3.84 (s, 3 H), 3.78 (s, 3 H), 3.35 (d, J = 12.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.94–2.85 (m, 1 H), 2.73–2.57 (m, 3 H), 2.16 (dt, J = 12.8, 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 2.12–2.04 (m, 1 H), 2.04–1.94 (m, 1 H), 1.68–1.60 (m, 1 H), 1.44–1.33 (m, 1 H), 0.70 (td, J = 13.6, 3.3 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 176.8, 147.6, 147.0, 138.8, 126.9, 125.0, 121.8, 110.9, 110.6, 68.2, 61.5, 55.8, 55.7, 54.3, 52.2, 46.5, 29.9, 28.6, 23.5, 19.4. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C20H26NO4: 344.1856; found: 344.1854. Methyl trans-2,3-Dimethoxy-5,8,10,11,12,12b-hexahydroisoindolo[1,2-a]isoquinoline-12a(6H)-carboxylate (trans-Jamtine) (2)To a solution of trans- 13 (180 mg, 0.42 mmol) in absolute EtOH (8 mL) was added excess Raney-Ni (W-2 type, newly reactivated), and the mixture was vigorously stirred at rt for 2 h. The mixture was then filtered through a plug of Celite that was washed with EtOAc. The filtrate was concentrated, and the residue was purified by chromatography [silica gel, CH2Cl2–MeOH (50:1)] to give a white solid; yield: 108 mg (75%); mp 104.0–106.3 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.79 (s, 1 H), 6.56 (s, 1 H), 5.71 (s, 1 H), 3.98 (dq, J = 12.0, 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.87 (s, 3 H), 3.85 (s, 1 H), 3.84 (s, 3 H), 3.42 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.29 (s, 3 H), 3.11 (dt, J = 11.9, 4.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.90 (ddd, J = 15.1, 10.1, 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.82 (dd, J = 8.9, 3.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.78–2.72 (m, 1 H), 2.52 (dt, J = 15.3, 3.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.14–2.08 (m, 2 H), 1.89–1.82 (m, 1 H), 1.56–1.51 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 173.3, 147.4, 146.6, 137.8, 128.4, 126.9, 121.1, 111.1, 110.0, 71.3, 57.1, 56.8, 56.0, 55.7, 51.4, 47.8, 31.9, 27.2, 24.3, 19.8. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C20H26NO4: 344.1856; found: 344.1855.