Objective To evaluate whether cervical dilation predicts the timing and likelihood of spontaneous labor at term.
Study Design This was a retrospective cohort of nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies who delivered at term from 2013 to 2015. Outpatient cervical examinations performed after 37 weeks and prior to labor onset were collected. Survival analysis was used to analyze time to spontaneous labor with cervical dilation as the primary predictor, modeled as continuous and categorical variables (<1 cm, 1 cm, >1 cm).
Results Our cohort included 726 women; 407 (56%) spontaneously labored, 263 (36%) were induced, and 56 (8%) had an unlabored cesarean delivery. Women with >1-cm dilation were three times more likely to spontaneously labor (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4–4) than those with <1-cm dilation. At 39 weeks, 60% of women with >1-cm dilation went into spontaneous labor as compared with only 28% of those with <1-cm dilation (aHR: 2.9; 95% CI: 2–4.4).
Conclusion In our cohort of nulliparous women at term, those with cervical dilation > 1 cm were significantly more likely to go into labor in the following week. This information can aid in counseling about elective induction of labor.
Keywords
cervical dilation -
elective induction -
labor
References
1
Caughey AB,
Sundaram V,
Kaimal AJ.
, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2009; (176) 1-257
3
Caughey AB,
Sundaram V,
Kaimal AJ.
, et al. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151 (04) 252-263
7
Snowden JM,
Muoto I,
Darney BG.
, et al. Oregon's hard-stop policy limiting elective early-term deliveries: association with obstetric procedure use and health outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (06) 1389-1396
8
Ananth CV,
Wilcox AJ,
Gyamfi-Bannerman C.
Obstetrical interventions for term first deliveries in the US. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2013; 27 (05) 442-451
9
Saccone G,
Berghella V.
Induction of labor at full term in uncomplicated singleton gestations: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (05) 629-636
11
Grobman WA,
Rice MM,
Reddy UM.
, et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (06) 513-523
13
Zanardo V,
Bertin M,
Sansone L,
Felice L.
The adaptive psychological changes of elective induction of labor in breastfeeding women. Early Hum Dev 2017; 104: 13-16
15
Rozenberg P,
Goffinet F,
Hessabi M.
Comparison of the Bishop score, ultrasonographically measured cervical length, and fetal fibronectin assay in predicting time until delivery and type of delivery at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182 (1 Pt 1): 108-113
17
Reis FM,
Gervasi MT,
Florio P.
, et al. Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189 (05) 1361-1367
21
Denison FC,
Price J,
Graham C,
Wild S,
Liston WA.
Maternal obesity, length of gestation, risk of postdates pregnancy and spontaneous onset of labour at term. BJOG 2008; 115 (06) 720-725
23
Oken E,
Kleinman KP,
Rich-Edwards J,
Gillman MW.
A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatr 2003; 3: 6
24 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 548: weight gain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (01) 210-212
25
Marquette GP,
Hutcheon JA,
Lee L.
Predicting the spontaneous onset of labour in post-date pregnancies: a population-based retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014; 36 (05) 391-399
27
San Román GA.
Concerns regarding a validated calculator to estimate risk of cesarean delivery after an induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219 (04) 421-422
30
Am G,
Ca C,
Middleton P.
, et al. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term (Review) Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (06) 1-3