Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2019; 33(04): 224-228
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696964
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Latest Trends in Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction

Christine Oh
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Sebastian J. Winocour
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
,
Valerie Lemaine
3   Plastic Surgery Consultants, Edina, Minnesota
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 October 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

There has been a shift in recent years toward a growing popularity of implant-based breast reconstruction, especially in the setting of increased frequency of concurrent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Advancements in implant safety and technology have also allowed for an expanding implant reconstruction practice across the country. The traditional approach is immediate two-stage implant reconstruction with placement of a tissue expander within a subpectoral pocket. The introduction of acellular dermal matrix has revolutionized implant-based breast reconstruction, allowing surgeons the opportunity to minimize morbidity while maximizing aesthetic outcomes. There have also been advances in the management of postoperative pain control as well as secondary revision surgery.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - subpectoral - mastectomy - breast cancer

Disclosures

None of the authors have a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this article.


 

  • References

  • 1 Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ. , et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (01) 15-23
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Apfelberg DB, Laub DR, Maser MR, Lash H. Submuscular breast reconstruction--indications and techniques. Ann Plast Surg 1981; 7 (03) 213-221
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Hammond DC, Schmitt WP, O'Connor EA. Treatment of breast animation deformity in implant-based reconstruction with pocket change to the subcutaneous position. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (06) 1540-1544
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (06) 1735-1740
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Maclin II MM, Deigni OA, Bengtson BP. The laminated nature of the pectoralis major muscle and the redefinition of the inframammary fold: clinical implications in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Clin Plast Surg 2015; 42 (04) 465-479
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Duncan DI. Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J 2001; 21 (01) 81-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55 (03) 232-239
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Nahabedian MY. Prosthetic breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrices: achieving predictability and reproducibility. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (05) e698
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Khavanin N, Gust MJ, Grant DW, Nguyen KT, Kim JY. Tabbed tissue expanders improve breast symmetry scores in breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (01) 57-62
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Spear SL, Economides JM, Shuck J, Patel KM. Analyzing implant movement with tabbed and nontabbed expanders through the process of two-stage breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (03) 256e-260e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Pittman TA, Fan KL, Knapp A, Frantz S, Spear SL. Comparison of different acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in breast reconstruction: the 50/50 study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (03) 521-528
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Spear SL, Sher SR, Al-Attar A. Focus on technique: supporting the soft-tissue envelope in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (05) (Suppl. 02) 89S-94S
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Nahabedian MY. Mastectomy, nipple-areola preservation, and immediate implant reconstruction: are total and partial muscle coverage techniques aesthetically equivalent?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (06) 319e-320e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Davila AA, Seth AK, Wang E. , et al. Human acellular dermis versus submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of short-term complications. Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40 (01) 19-27
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Oh C, Winocour S, Lemaine V. Acellular dermal matrix in submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction: a novel technique to improve symmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (04) 641e-643e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Saint-Cyr M, Nagarkar P, Wong C, Thakar H, Dauwe P, Rohrich RJ. The pedicled subpectoral fascia flap for expander coverage in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a novel technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (05) 1328-1334
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Nasr MW, Habre SB, Jabbour H, Baradhi A, El Asmar Z. A randomized controlled trial of postoperative pain control after subpectoral breast augmentation using intercostal nerve block versus bupivacaine pectoralis major infiltration: a pilot study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (04) e83-e84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Jabs D, Richards BG, Richards FD. Quantitative effects of tumescent infiltration and bupivicaine injection in decreasing postoperative pain in submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 2008; 28 (05) 528-533
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Chaudhry A, Hallam S, Chambers A, Sahu AK, Govindarajulu S, Cawthorn S. Improving postoperative pain management in subpectoral tissue expander implant reconstruction of the breast using an elastomeric pump. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2015; 97 (05) 364-368
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Coopey SB, Specht MC, Warren L, Smith BL, Winograd JM, Fleischmann K. Use of preoperative paravertebral block decreases length of stay in patients undergoing mastectomy plus immediate reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20 (04) 1282-1286
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Fahy AS, Jakub JW, Dy BM. , et al. Paravertebral blocks in patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction provides improved pain control and decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21 (10) 3284-3289
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Glissmeyer C, Johnson W, Sherman B, Glissmeyer M, Garreau J, Johnson N. Effect of paravertebral nerve blocks on narcotic use after mastectomy with reconstruction. Am J Surg 2015; 209 (05) 881-883
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Abdelsattar JM, Boughey JC, Fahy AS. , et al. Comparative study of liposomal bupivacaine versus paravertebral block for pain control following mastectomy with immediate tissue expander reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (02) 465-470
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Butz DR, Shenaq DS, Rundell VL. , et al. Postoperative pain and length of stay lowered by use of Exparel in immediate, implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 3 (05) e391
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Senior MA, Fourie LR. Botox and the management of pectoral spasm after subpectoral implant insertion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (01) 224-225
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Adkinson JM, Miller NF, Murphy Jr RX. Neurectomy for breast reconstruction-related spasms of the pectoralis major muscle. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (02) 257-259
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Richards A, Ritz M, Donahoe S, Southwick G. Botox for contraction of pectoral muscles. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (01) 270-271
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Winocour S, Murad MH, Bidgoli-Moghaddam M. , et al. A systematic review of the use of Botulinum toxin type A with subpectoral breast implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (01) 34-41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Layeeque R, Hochberg J, Siegel E. , et al. Botulinum toxin infiltration for pain control after mastectomy and expander reconstruction. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (04) 608-613 , discussion 613–614
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Zhibo X, Miaobo Z. Botulinum toxin type A infiltration for pain control after breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (05) 263e-264e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Purkiss J, Welch M, Doward S, Foster K. Capsaicin-stimulated release of substance P from cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons: involvement of two distinct mechanisms. Biochem Pharmacol 2000; 59 (11) 1403-1406
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Lo KK, Aycock JK. A blinded randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of botulinum toxin for pain control in breast reconstruction with tissue expanders. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 74 (03) 281-283
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Serra-Renom JM, Muñoz-Olmo JL, Serra-Mestre JM. Fat grafting in postmastectomy breast reconstruction with expanders and prostheses in patients who have received radiotherapy: formation of new subcutaneous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (01) 12-18
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Komorowska-Timek E, Turfe Z, Davis AT. Outcomes of prosthetic reconstruction of irradiated and nonirradiated breasts with fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (01) 1e-9e
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Brown AWW, Kabir M, Sherman KA, Meybodi F, French JR, Elder EB. Patient reported outcomes of autologous fat grafting after breast cancer surgery. Breast 2017; 35: 14-20
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Qureshi AA, Odom EB, Parikh RP, Myckatyn TM, Tenenbaum MM. Patient-reported outcomes of aesthetics and satisfaction in immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy with implants and fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (09) 999-1008
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Niddam J, Vidal L, Hersant B, Meningaud JP. Primary fat grafting to the pectoralis muscle during latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (11) e1059
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Petit JY, Maisonneuve P, Rotmensz N, Bertolini F, Rietjens M. Fat grafting after invasive breast cancer: a matched case-control study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (06) 1292-1296
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 De Decker M, De Schrijver L, Thiessen F, Tondu T, Van Goethem M, Tjalma WA. Breast cancer and fat grafting: efficacy, safety and complications-a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 207: 100-108
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Myckatyn TM, Wagner IJ, Mehrara BJ. , et al. Cancer risk after fat transfer: a multicenter case-cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (01) 11-18
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Waked K, Colle J, Doornaert M, Cocquyt V, Blondeel P. Systematic review: the oncological safety of adipose fat transfer after breast cancer surgery. Breast 2017; 31: 128-136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar