Am J Perinatol 2021; 38(09): 901-908
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402747
Original Article

Methods for Estimating Endotracheal Tube Insertion Depth in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2   Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Maher Faden
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
› Institutsangaben

Funding None.
Preview

Abstract

Objective To systematically review the methods for estimating endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion depth in neonates.

Study Design Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs). RCTs comparing two or more different methods to estimate ETT insertion depth were included. Two co-authors independently extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome includes the proportion of optimally placed ETT tips identified on chest X-ray.

Results Eight RCTs evaluating seven different estimation methods were included. Trials varied defining the optimal position of the ETT tip. Overall, the percentage of optimal position ranged from 8.8 to 93%. The weight, gestation nomogram, and vocal cord estimation methods resulted in malpositioning of ETT tips in more than half of infants ≤30 weeks' gestational age. The rates of optimal ETT tip placement with the digital palpation method differ between moderately (83–93%; two RCTs) and extremely (47%; one RCT) preterm infants. Meta-analysis showed no difference between weight-based and digital palpation methods (relative risk = 0.88; 95% confidence interval = 0.75–1.04; three RCTs; participants = 205; I 2 = 0%; quality of evidence, low).

Conclusion Commonly used estimation methods for ETT tip placement are inaccurate and unreliable. Further research is required to improve the accuracy of estimation methods and also to identify the usefulness of the digital palpation method in large clinical trials.

Registration

PROSPERO, registration number CRD42018117510, the international prospective register for systematic reviews (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).


Authors' Contributions

A.R. conceptualized and designed the study, performed the search and initial screening of the articles, abstracted the data, performed initial analyses and assessed the risk of bias, graded quality of evidence, drafted the manuscript, and approved the final version. M.F. shortlisted the articles to ascertain no missing studies for selection, double checked the numbers included in the pooled analyses and results, verified risk of biases and quality of evidence, revised the manuscript, and approved the final version.


Note

The study was presented in part at Pediatric Academic Societies Conference, 2019, Baltimore, United States.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 21. Juni 2019

Angenommen: 05. Dezember 2019

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
30. Januar 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA