Ni-Catalyzed Intramolecular Reductive 1,2-Dicarbofunctionalization of Alkene: Facile Access to Podophyllum Lignans Core

Jian Xiao; Ya-Wen Wang; Zhong-Ping Qiu; Yu Peng

doi:10.1055/s-0040-1707188

Synlett, Table of Contents

Synlett 2021; 32(16): 1662-1664
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1707188

cluster

Modern Nickel-Catalyzed Reactions

Ni-Catalyzed Intramolecular Reductive 1,2-Dicarbofunctionalization of Alkene: Facile Access to Podophyllum Lignans Core

Jian Xiao

^aSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. of China

,

Ya-Wen Wang

^aSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. of China

,

Zhong-Ping Qiu∗

^aSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. of China

,

Yu Peng ∗

^aSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. of China

^bState Key Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. of China

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

All articles of this category

In memory of Prof. Xuan Tian

Abstract

The facile access to the tetracyclic skeleton of podophyllotoxin, a medicinally important lignan natural product, was efficiently achieved via a unique intramolecular alkylarylation of the tethered alkene in a dihalide under mild conditions using reductive nickel catalysis.

Key words

nickel - reductive coupling - intramolecular - cyclization - synthesis

Full Text

References

References and Notes

1a Knappke CE. I, Grupe S, Gärtner D, Corpet M, Gosmini C, Jacobi von Wangelin A. Chem. Eur. J. 2014; 20: 6828
1b Moragas T, Correa A, Martin R. Chem. Eur. J. 2014; 20: 8242
1c Weix DJ. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015; 48: 1767
1d Wang X, Dai Y, Gong H. Org. Chem. Front. 2015; 2: 1411

2 For a review, see: Ping Y, Kong W. Synthesis 2020; 52: 979

For selected examples, see:

3a Anthony D, Lin Q, Baudet J, Diao T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 3198
3b Kuang Y, Wang X, Anthony D, Diao T. Chem. Commun. 2018; 54: 2558
3c Wang K, Ding Z, Zhou Z, Kong W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 12364
3d Xu S, Wang K, Kong W. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 7498
3e Jin Y, Wang C. Chem. Sci. 2019; 10: 1780
3f Jin Y, Wang C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 6722
3g Qin X, Lee MW. Y, Zhou JS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017; 56: 12723

4 García-Domínguez A, Li Z, Nevado C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 6835

5a Yan C.-S, Peng Y, Xu X.-B, Wang Y.-W. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 6039 ; corrigendum: Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 15438
5b Xu X.-B, Liu J, Zhang J.-J, Wang Y.-W, Peng Y. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 550
5c Peng Y, Luo L, Yan C.-S, Zhang J.-J, Wang Y.-W. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 78: 10960
5d Peng Y, Xu X.-B, Xiao J, Wang Y.-W. Chem. Commun. 2014; 50: 472
5e Luo L, Zhang J.-J, Ling W.-J, Shao Y.-L, Wang Y.-W, Peng Y. Synthesis 2014; 46: 1908
5f Peng Y, Xiao J, Xu X.-B, Duan S.-M, Ren L, Shao Y.-L, Wang Y.-W. Org. Lett. 2016; 18: 5170
5g Xiao J, Wang Y.-W, Peng Y. Synthesis 2017; 49: 3576
5h Xiao J, Cong X.-W, Yang G.-Z, Wang Y.-W, Peng Y. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 1651
5i Xiao J, Cong X.-W, Yang G.-Z, Wang Y.-W, Peng Y. Chem. Commun. 2018; 54: 2040
5j Luo L, Zhai X.-Y, Wang Y.-W, Peng Y, Gong H. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 989
5k Ouyang Y, Peng Y, Li W.-DZ. Tetrahedron 2019; 75: 4486

For reviews, see:

6a Peng Y. Lignans, Lignins, and Resveratrols. From Biosynthesis to Total Synthesis: Strategies and Tactics for Natural Products. Zografos AL. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken: 2016. Chap. 10, 331-379
6b Liu Y.-Q, Yang L, Tian X. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2007; 3: 37
6c Sellars JD, Steel PG. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 3815

For past syntheses of podophyllotoxin (3), see:

6d Ting CP, Tschanen E, Jang E, Maimone TJ. Tetrahedron 2019; 75: 3299
6e Hajra S, Garai S, Hazra S. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 6530
6f Ting CP, Maimone TJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 3115
6g Wu Y, Zhao J, Chen J, Pan C, Li L, Zhang H. Org. Lett. 2009; 11: 597
6h Stadler D, Bach T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 7557
6i Wu Y, Zhang H, Zhao Y, Zhao J, Chen J, Li L. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 1199
6j Reynolds AJ, Scott AJ, Turner CI, Sherburn MC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 12108
6k Berkowitz DB, Choi S, Maeng J.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2000; 65: 847
6l Hadimani SB, Tanpure RP, Bhat SV. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996; 37: 4791
6m Bush EJ, Jones DW. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993; 1200
6n Van Speybroeck R, Guo H, Van der Eycken J, Vandewalle M. Tetrahedron 1991; 47: 4675
6o Andrews RC, Teague SJ, Meyers AI. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988; 110: 7854
6p Macdonald DI, Durst T. J. Org. Chem. 1986; 51: 4749
6q Gensler WJ, Gatsonis CD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962; 84: 1748 ; see also ref. 5h in this article

For chemoenzymatic syntheses of podophyllotoxin (3), see:

6r Li J, Zhang X, Renata H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 11657
6s Lazzarotto M, Hammerer L, Hetmann M, Borg A, Schmermund L, Steiner L, Hartmann P, Belaj F, Kroutil W, Gruber K, Fuchs M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019; 58: 8226

For a synthesis of deoxypodophyllotoxin, see:

6t Kolly-Kovač T, Renaud P. Synthesis 2005; 1459

7 Snyder SA, Wright NE, Pflueger JJ, Breazzano SP. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 8629
8 Gibson SE, Guillo N, Middleton RJ, Thuilliez A, Tozer MJ. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997; 447
9 Kato T, Ichinose I, Kamoshida A, Kitahara Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976; 518 ; and references cited therein
10 In a 100 mL round-bottom flask, enol ether 7 (1.50 g, 3.1 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂ (35 mL) and cooled to 0 °C. To this solution was added TBCD (97%, 1.57 g, 3.7 mmol, 1.2 equiv) portionwise, and the mixture was stirred for 30 min at 0 °C. A solution of allyl alcohol (3.6 mL, 62 mmol, 20.0 equiv) in CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) was then added dropwise, and the resulting mixture was gradually warmed to room temperature and stirred further for 9 h. The reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO₃ (3 mL), Na₂SO₃ (3 mL), and stirred further for 30 min. The resulting mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (2 × 50 mL), and the combined organic layers were washed with water (2 × 15 mL) and brine (15 mL), respectively, dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc = 10:1 → petroleum ether/EtOAc = 4:1) on silica gel to afford 8 (1.519 g, 79% yield) as a yellow oil. R_f = 0.36 (petroleum ether/EtOAc = 2:1). IR (film): ν_max = 2930, 2838, 1590, 1504, 1479, 1461, 1422, 1383, 1326, 1265, 1229, 1128, 1037, 929, 845, 792, 736, 701, 685, 582 cm^–1. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ (major isomer) = 7.19 (s, 1 H), 6.99 (s, 1 H), 6.52 (s, 2 H), 5.93 (s, 1 H), 5.89 (s, 1 H), 5.86–5.80 (m, 1 H), 5.35 (dd, J = 17.2, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.13 (dd, J = 10.8, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.76 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.55 (dd, J = 11.2, 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.26 (dd, J = 13.2, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.00 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.88 (dd, J = 12.8, 5.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.76 (s, 6 H), 3.74 (s, 3 H), 3.31 (s, 3 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 153.3 (2 C), 148.7, 147.3, 137.23, 137.17, 135.6, 133.8, 119.0, 116.7, 107.0, 105.3 (2 C), 102.0, 101.8, 90.5, 69.7, 60.8, 57.7, 57.3, 56.21 (2 C), 56.17 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for C₂₃H₂₆O₇ ⁷⁹BrINa⁺ [M + Na]⁺: 642.9799; found: 642.9791.
11 Xiao J, Nan G, Wang Y.-W, Peng Y. Molecules 2018; 23: 3037

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information