Strategies for ortho-tert-Butylation of Phenols and their Analogues

Abstract

A new general process for constructing ortho-tert-butyl phenols is presented within the context of other known methods. All are briefly evaluated with regards to regioselectivity, efficiency, and functional group tolerance. In addition, we present an assortment of tert-butyl substrates accessed through o-QM chemistry. Our conclusion is that the o-QM process provides greater yields, flexibility, and generality than most other known methods for delivering ortho-tert-buytlated phenols and their derivatives.

1 Introduction

2 Friedel–Crafts Alkylation

3 Addition of t-Bu^– or t-Bu^• to Carbonyl Compounds

4 ipso-S_NAr Reactions of Aryl Methoxy and tert-Butylsulfoxide Moieties

5 Metal-Mediated Coupling of Aryl Bromides

6 Applications of o-Quinone Methides (o-QMs)

7 Conclusion

Key words

ortho-tert-butyl phenol - ortho-quinone methide - Friedel–Crafts Alkylation - S_NAr reactions - ipso substitution - metal-mediated aryl coupling

Publication History

Received: 22 November 2021

Accepted after revision: 06 January 2022

Article published online:
28 January 2022

• References and Notes

• 1 Barnes-Seeman D, Jain M, Bell L, Ferreira S, Cohen S, Chen X.-H, Amin J, Snodgrass B, Hatsis P. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2013; 4: 514
• 2 Randolph JT, Krueger AC, Donner PL, Pratt JK, Liu D, Motter CE, Rockway TW, Tufano MD, Wagner R, Lim HB, Beyer JM, Mondal R, Panchal NS, Colletti L, Liu Y, Koev G, Kati WM, Hernandez LE, Beno DW. A, Longenecker KL, Stewart KD, Dumas EO, Molla A, Maring CJ. J. Med. Chem. 2018; 61: 1153
• 3a Talamas FX, Abbot SC, Anand S, Brameld KA, Carter DS, Chen J, Davis D, de Vincent J, Fung AD, Gong L, Harris SF, Inbar P, Labadie SS, Lee EK, Lemoine R, Le Pogam S, Leveque V, Li J, McIntosh J, Nájera I, Park J, Railkar A, Rajyaguru S, Sangi M, Schoenfeld RC, Staben LR, Tan Y, Taygerly JP, Villaseñor AG, Weller PE. J. Med. Chem. 2014; 57: 1914
• 3b Pi Z, Sutton J, Lloyd J, Hua J, Price L, Wu Q, Chang M, Zheng J, Rehfuss R, Huang CS, Wexler RR, Lam PY. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013; 23: 4206
• 4 Hadia S, Van Goor F, Zhou J, Arumugam V, McCartney J, Hazlewood A, Decker C, Negulescu P, Grootenhuis PD. J. J. Med. Chem. 2014; 57: 9776
• 5a Chaudhuri B, Sharma MM. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1991; 30: 227
• 5b Hart H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949; 71: 1966
• 5c Kamitori Y, Hojo M, Masuda R, Izumi T, Tsukamoto S. J. Org. Chem. 1984; 49: 4161
• 5d Gagea BC, Parvulescu AN, Parvulescu VI, Auroux A, Grange P, Poncelet G. Catal. Lett. 2003; 91: 141
• 5e Gagea BC, Pârvulescu AN, Poncelet G, Pârvulescu VI. Catal. Lett. 2005; 105: 219
• 5f Pezzotta C, Fleury G, Soetens M, Van der Perre S, Denayer JF. M, Riant O, Gaigneaux EM. J. Catal. 2018; 359: 198
• 6 Zambia RA, Caldwell CG, Kopka IE, Hammond ML. J. Org. Chem. 1988; 53: 4135
• 7 Barton DH. R, Sas W. Tetrahedron 1990; 46: 3419
• 8a Fujiwara Y, Domingo V, Seiple IB, Gianatassio R, Del Bel M, Baran PS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 3292
• 8b Hamsath A, Galloway JD, Baxter RD. Synthesis 2018; 50: 2915
• 8c Galloway JD, Mai DN, Baxter RD. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 5772
• 9 Richtzenhain H, Nippus P. Chem. Ber. 1949; 82: 408 ; and references cited therein
• 10a Meyers AI, Mihelich ED. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975; 97: 7383
• 10b Meyers AI, Gabel R, Mihelich ED. J. Org. Chem. 1978; 43: 1372
• 10c Meyers AI, Williams BE. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978; 3: 223
• 11 Clayden J, Stimson CC, Keenan M. Chem. Commun. 2006; 1393
• 12a Rudolph A, Lautens M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 2656
• 12b Glorius F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 8347
• 12c Terao J, Naitoh Y, Kuniyasu H, Kambe N. Chem. Commun. 2007; 825
• 12d Frisch AC, Beller M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 674
• 12e Terao J, Watanabe H, Ikumi A, Kuniyasu H, Kambe N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002; 124: 4222
• 12f Terao J, Ikumi A, Kuniyasu H, Kambe N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 5646
• 12g Vechorkin O, Proust V, Hu X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 9756

For organozinc reagents, see:
• 12h Cahiez G, Foulgoc L, Moyeux A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 2969

For organocopper reagents, see:
• 12i Langlois J.-B, Alexakis A. Chem. Commun. 2009; 3868

For organomagnesium reagents, see:
• 12j Hayashi T, Konishi M, Yokota K, Kumada M. Chem. Lett. 1980; 767
• 12k Cahiez G, Avedissian H. Synthesis 1998; 1199
• 12l Bell TW, Hu L.-Y, Patel SV. J. Org. Chem. 1987; 52: 3847
• 12m Hintermann L, Xiao L, Labonne A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 8246
• 12n Schröter S, Stock C, Bach T. Tetrahedron 2005; 61: 2245

For chromium, see:
• 12o Liu P, Chen C, Cong X, Tang J, Zheng X. Nat. Commun. 2018; 9: 4637
• 13 Lohre C, Dröge T, Wang C, Glorius F. Chem. Eur. J. 2011; 17: 6052
• 14 Ando S, Mawatari M, Matsunaga H, Ishizuka T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 3287
• 15 For ortho bromination of a phenol, see: Pearson DE, Wysong RD, Breder CV. J. Org. Chem. 1967; 32: 2358
• 16a Van De Water RW, Magdziak D, Chau JN, Pettus TR. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 6502
• 16b Jones RM, Van De Water RW, Lindsey CC, Hoarau C, Ung T, Pettus TR. R. J. Org. Chem. 2001; 66: 3435
• 16c Green JC, Pettus TR. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 1603
• 16d Bai W.-J, David JG, Feng Z.-G, Weaver MG, Wu K.-L, Pettus TR. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014; 47: 3655
• 17 Looker AR, Wilde N, Ryan MP, Roeper S, Ye Z, Lewandowski BL. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 85: 501
• 18 Representative Procedure To dry nitrogen-flushed 10 mL Schlenk flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was charged with SI-1 (100 mg) in dry Et₂O (3.8 mL, 0.1 M) and MeMgCl (0.42 mL, 2.69 M, 1.13 mmol, 3.0 equivalent) was added dropwise at –78 °C. The reaction was allowed to slowly warm to room temperature overnight. The reaction was quenched with 1 M aq. NH₄Cl (3 mL) and extracted with Et₂O (4 × 1 mL). The combined organic fractions were washed with brine (5 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (ethyl acetate–hexane, 1:9) to yield the tert-butylated phenol 23 (56.9 mg, 84% isolated yield). ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 6.91 (dd, J = 6.7, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.82–6.74 (m, 2 H), 6.01 (s, OH), 3.89 (s, 3 H), 1.42 (s, 9 H). ¹³C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 146.82, 144.43, 135.75, 119.19, 118.81, 108.58, 56.28, 34.78, 29.54. HRMS (EI+): m/z calcd for C₁₁H₁₆O₂ [M⁺]: 180.1150; found: 180.1149.
• 19 Preparations of the acetophenones are all fully described in the Supporting Information.