PDF herunterladen
Am J Perinatol 2021; 38(09): 880-888
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722606
SMFM Fellowship Series Article

Neonatal Outcomes at Extreme Prematurity by Gestational Age Versus Birth Weight in a Contemporary Cohort

Elizabeth B. Ausbeck
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Phillip Hunter Allman
2   Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Jeff M. Szychowski
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
2   Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Akila Subramaniam
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Anup Katheria
3   Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Neonatal Research Institute, Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns, San Diego, California
› Institutsangaben Funding The original trial was supported by a grant (1R01HD088646-01A1) from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health.
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study is to describe the rates of neonatal death and severe neonatal morbidity in a contemporary cohort, as well as to evaluate the predictive value of birth gestational age (GA) and birth weight, independently and combined, for neonatal mortality and morbidity in the same contemporary cohort.

Study Design We performed a secondary analysis of an international, multicenter randomized controlled trial of delayed umbilical cord clamping versus umbilical cord milking in preterm infants born at 230/7 to 316/7 weeks of gestation. The current analysis was restricted to infants delivered <28 weeks. The primary outcomes of this analysis were neonatal death and a composite of severe neonatal morbidity. Incidence of outcomes was compared by weeks of GA, with planned subanalysis comparing small for gestational age (SGA) versus non-SGA neonates. Multivariable logistic regression was then used to model these outcomes based on birth GA, birth weight, or a combination of both as primary independent predictors to determine which had superior ability to predict outcomes.

Results Of 474 neonates in the original trial, 180 (38%) were included in this analysis. Overall, death occurred in 27 (15%) and severe morbidity in 139 (77%) neonates. Rates of mortality and morbidity declined with increasing GA (mortality 54% at 23 vs. 9% at 27 weeks). SGA infants (n = 25) had significantly higher mortality compared with non-SGA infants across all GAs (p < 0.01). There was no difference in the predictive value for neonatal death or severe morbidity between the three prediction options (GA, birth weight, or GA and birth weight).

Conclusion Death and severe neonatal morbidity declined with advancing GA, with higher rates of death in SGA infants. Birth GA and birth weight were both good predictors of outcomes; however, combining the two was not more predictive, even in SGA infants.

Key Points

  • We performed a secondary analysis of multicenter randomized clinical trials.

  • The study included only extremely preterm neonates <28 weeks.

  • We provide rates of neonatal morbidity in a contemporary cohort.

Keywords

extreme prematurity - fetal growth restriction - intrauterine fetal growth restriction - neonatal outcomes - prematurity

Note

This work was presented as a poster at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine 40th Annual Pregnancy Meeting, Grapevine, TX, February 3 to 8, 2020.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 29. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 08. Dezember 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. Januar 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2017; 66 (01) 1-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus No. 6: periviable birth. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (04) e187-e199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Raju TN, Mercer BM, Burchfield DJ, Joseph Jr GF. Periviable birth: executive summary of a joint workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (05) 1083-1096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Peerzada JM, Richardson DK, Burns JP. Delivery room decision-making at the threshold of viability. J Pediatr 2004; 145 (04) 492-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Higgins RD, Delivoria-Papadopoulos M, Raju TN. Executive summary of the workshop on the border of viability. Pediatrics 2005; 115 (05) 1392-1396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tyson JE, Stoll BJ. Evidence-based ethics and the care and outcome of extremely premature infants. Clin Perinatol 2003; 30 (02) 363-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Batton DG. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Clinical report—antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation at an extremely low gestational age. Pediatrics 2009; 124 (01) 422-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dall'Asta A, Brunelli V, Prefumo F, Frusca T, Lees CC. Early onset fetal growth restriction. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol 2017; 3: 2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Visser GH, Bilardo CM, Lees C. Fetal growth restriction at the limits of viability. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36 (02) 162-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Practice Bulletin No. 175: ultrasound in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (06) e241-e256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J, Green C, Higgins RD. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Intensive care for extreme prematurity--moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (16) 1672-1681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ambalavanan N, Carlo WA, Tyson JE. et al; Generic Database, Subcommittees of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Outcome trajectories in extremely preterm infants. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (01) e115-e125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rysavy MA, Horbar JD, Bell EF. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network and Vermont Oxford Network. Assessment of an updated neonatal research network extremely preterm birth outcome model in the Vermont Oxford Network. JAMA Pediatr 2020; 174 (05) e196294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Katheria A, Reister F, Essers J. et al. Association of umbilical cord milking vs. delayed umbilical cord clamping with death or severe intraventricular hemorrhage among preterm infants. JAMA 2019; 322 (19) 1877-1886
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD. et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg 1978; 187 (01) 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44 (03) 837-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Costeloe KL, Hennessy EM, Haider S, Stacey F, Marlow N, Draper ES. Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies). BMJ 2012; 345: e7976
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Story L, Sankaran S, Mullins E. et al. Survival of pregnancies with small for gestational age detected before 24 weeks gestation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 188: 100-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2010; 126 (03) 443-456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bader D, Kugelman A, Boyko V. et al; Israel Neonatal Network. Risk factors and estimation tool for death among extremely premature infants: a national study. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (04) 696-703
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 American College of Obstetrians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 38: perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 79: 181-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rysavy MA, Li L, Bell EF. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (19) 1801-1811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bolisetty S, Legge N, Bajuk B, Lui K. New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory Neonatal Intensive Care Units' Data Collection. Preterm infant outcomes in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. J Paediatr Child Health 2015; 51 (07) 713-721
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Younge N, Goldstein RF, Bann CM. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes among periviable infants. N Engl J Med 2017; 376 (07) 617-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Glass HC, Costarino AT, Stayer SA, Brett CM, Cladis F, Davis PJ. Outcomes for extremely premature infants. Anesth Analg 2015; 120 (06) 1337-1351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W. et al; NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child health and human development neonatal research network, January 1995 through December 1996. Pediatrics 2001; 107 (01) E1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 MacDonald H. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2002; 110 (05) 1024-1027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lees C, Marlow N, Arabin B. et al; TRUFFLE Group. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42 (04) 400-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar