PDF herunterladen
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 83(S 02): e113-e125
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722933
Original Article

Systematic Review Comparing Open versus Endoscopic Surgery in Clival Chordomas and a 10-Year Single-Center Experience

Asfand Baig Mirza  ‡   *
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Visagan Ravindran  ‡   *
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Mohamed Okasha
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Timothy Martyn Boardman
2   GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Eleni Maratos
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Barazi Sinan
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
,
Nick Thomas
1   Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
› Institutsangaben
Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objectives Chordomas are rare, slow-growing, and osteo-destructive tumors of the primitive notochord. There is still contention in the literature as to the optimal management of chordoma. We conducted a systematic review of the surgical management of chordoma along with our 10-year institutional experience.

Design A systematic search of the literature was performed in October 2020 by using MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles relating to the surgical management of clival chordomas. We also searched for all adult patients surgically treated for primary clival chordomas at our institute between 2009 and 2019.

Participants Only articles describing chordomas arising from the clivus were included in the analysis. For our institution experience, only adult primary clival chordoma cases were included.

Main Outcome Measures Patients were divided into endoscopic or open surgery. Rate of gross total resection (GTR), recurrence, and complications were measured.

Results Our literature search yielded 24 articles to include in the study. Mean GTR rate among endoscopic cases was 51.9% versus 41.7% for open surgery. Among the eight cases in our institutional experience, we found similar GTR rates between endoscopic and open surgery.

Conclusion Although there is clear evidence in the literature that endoscopic approaches provide better rates of GTR with fewer overall complications compared to open surgery. However, there are still situations where endoscopy is not viable, and thus, open surgery should still be considered if required.

Keywords

Chordoma - clivus - endoscopic skull base - proton beam therapy

Note

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (name of institute/committee) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.


* Authors contributed equally to the manuscript.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 20. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 27. November 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Februar 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Walcott BP, Nahed BV, Mohyeldin A, Coumans JV, Kahle KT, Ferreira MJ. Chordoma: current concepts, management, and future directions. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13 (02) e69-e76
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Fletcher CDM, Hogendoorn P, Mertens F. WHO Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon: IARC Press; 2013: 321-324
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Zhou Y, Hu B, Wu Z, Cheng H, Dai M, Zhang B. The clinical outcomes for chordomas in the cranial base and spine: a single center experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (23) e15980
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Gagliardi F, Boari N, Riva P, Mortini P. Current therapeutic options and novel molecular markers in skull base chordomas. Neurosurg Rev 2012; 35 (01) 1-13 , discussion 13–14
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Colangeli S, Muratori F, Bettini L. et al. Surgical treatment of sacral chordoma: en bloc resection with negative margins is a determinant of the long-term outcome. Surg Technol Int 2018; 33: 343-348
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Campbell RG, Prevedello DM, Ditzel Filho L, Otto BA, Carrau RL. Contemporary management of clival chordomas. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 23 (02) 153-161
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Jahangiri A, Jian B, Miller L, El-Sayed IH, Aghi MK. Skull base chordomas: clinical features, prognostic factors, and therapeutics. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2013; 24 (01) 79-88
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Culebras D, Torales J, Reyes LA. et al. [Extended endoscopic endonasal surgery for clival chordoma and chondrosarcoma: our experience in 14 cases]. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2018; 29 (04) 201-208
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Zoli M, Milanese L, Bonfatti R. et al. Clival chordomas: considerations after 16 years of endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg 2018; 128 (02) 329-338
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Choy W, Terterov S, Ung N. et al. Adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery and radiation therapy for the treatment of intracranial chordomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016; 77 (01) 38-46
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Erazo IS, Galvis CF, Aguirre LE, Iglesias R, Abarca LC. Clival chondroid chordoma: a case report and review of the literature. Cureus 2018; 10 (09) e3381
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Alan O, Akin Telli T, Ercelep O. et al. Chordoma: a case series and review of the literature. J Med Case Reports 2018; 12 (01) 239
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Alahmari M, Temel Y. Skull base chordoma treated with proton therapy: a systematic review. Surg Neurol Int 2019; 10: 96-2019
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Tian X, Liu K, Hou Y, Cheng J, Zhang J. The evolution of proton beam therapy: current and future status. Mol Clin Oncol 2018; 8 (01) 15-21
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Dehdashti AR, Karabatsou K, Ganna A, Witterick I, Gentili F. Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for treatment of clival chordomas: early results in 12 patients. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (02) 299-307 , discussion 307–309
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Frank G, Sciarretta V, Calbucci F, Farneti G, Mazzatenta D, Pasquini E. The endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach for the treatment of cranial base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (01, Suppl 1): discussion ONS50–ONS57 ONS50-ONS57
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Fraser JF, Nyquist GG, Moore N, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal transclival resection of chordomas: operative technique, clinical outcome, and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 2010; 112 (05) 1061-1069
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Garzaro M, Zenga F, Raimondo L. et al. Three-dimensional endoscopy in transnasal transsphenoidal approach to clival chordomas. Head Neck 2016; 38 (Suppl. 01) E1814-E1819
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Holzmann D, Reisch R, Krayenbühl N, Hug E, Bernays RL. The transnasal transclival approach for clivus chordoma. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2010; 53 (5-6): 211-217
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Hong Jiang W, Ping Zhao S, Hai Xie Z, Zhang H, Zhang J, Yun Xiao J. Endoscopic resection of chordomas in different clival regions. Acta Otolaryngol 2009; 129 (01) 71-83
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Jho HD. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurooncol 2001; 54 (02) 187-195
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ. et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of cranial base chordomas: outcomes and learning curve. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (03) 614-624 , discussion 624–625
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Li C, Zhu H, Zong X. et al. Application of endoscopic endonasal approach in skull base surgeries: summary of 1886 cases in a single center for 10 consecutive years. Chin Neurosurg J 2020; 6: 21
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Rahme RJ, Arnaout OM, Sanusi OR, Kesavabhotla K, Chandler JP. Endoscopic approach to clival chordomas: the northwestern experience. World Neurosurg 2018; 110: e231-e238
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Soloperto D, Fabbris C, De Rossi S, Musumeci A, Marchioni D. Endoscopic endonasal surgery of clival chordomas: preliminary results. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 71 (04) 486-491
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Stippler M, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB. Endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (02) 268-277 , discussion 277–278
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Tan NC, Naidoo Y, Oue S. et al. Endoscopic surgery of skull base chordomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73 (06) 379-386
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Wang Q, Wang Y, Wang J, Wang Y. Clinical classification of clival chordomas for transnasal approaches. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 43 (04) 1201-1210
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Zhang HK, Sun XC, Hu L, Wang JJ, Wang DH. Endonasal endoscopic resection and radiotherapy in skull base chordomas. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (07) e709-e713
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Zhang Q, Kong F, Yan B, Ni Z, Liu H. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for clival chordoma and chondrosarcoma. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2008; 70 (02) 124-129
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Dassoulas K, Schlesinger D, Yen CP, Sheehan J. The role of gamma knife surgery in the treatment of skull base chordomas. J Neurooncol 2009; 94 (02) 243-248
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Gay E, Sekhar LN, Rubinstein E. et al. Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the cranial base: results and follow-up of 60 patients. Neurosurgery 1995; 36 (05) 887-896 , discussion 896–897
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Goel A. Chordoma and chondrosarcoma: relationship to the internal carotid artery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995; 133 (1-2): 30-35
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Takami T, Ohata K, Goto T, Tsuyuguchi N, Nishio A, Hara M. Surgical management of petroclival chordomas: report of eight cases. Skull Base 2006; 16 (02) 85-94
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Tzortzidis F, Elahi F, Wright D, Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN. Patient outcome at long-term follow-up after aggressive microsurgical resection of cranial base chordomas. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (02) 230-237 , discussion 230–237
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Cavallo LM, Mazzatenta D, d'Avella E. et al. The management of clival chordomas: an Italian multicentric study. J Neurosurg 2020; 1-10
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Yumiko Oishi, Tamura R, Takahashi S. et al. A comparative study between traditional microscopic surgeries and endoscopic endonasal surgery for skull base chordomas. World Neurosurg 2020; 134: e1099-e1107
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Ares C, Hug EB, Lomax AJ. et al. Effectiveness and safety of spot scanning proton radiation therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: first long-term report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 75 (04) 1111-1118
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Demizu Y, Mizumoto M, Onoe T. et al. Proton beam therapy for bone sarcomas of the skull base and spine: a retrospective nationwide multicenter study in Japan. Cancer Sci 2017; 108 (05) 972-977
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Deraniyagala RL, Yeung D, Mendenhall WM. et al. Proton therapy for skull base chordomas: an outcome study from the university of Florida proton therapy institute. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75 (01) 53-57
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Fung V, Calugaru V, Bolle S. et al. Proton beam therapy for skull base chordomas in 106 patients: a dose adaptive radiation protocol. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128 (02) 198-202
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Grosshans DR, Zhu XR, Melancon A. et al. Spot scanning proton therapy for malignancies of the base of skull: treatment planning, acute toxicities, and preliminary clinical outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 90 (03) 540-546
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Hug EB, Loredo LN, Slater JD. et al. Proton radiation therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (03) 432-439
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Igaki H, Tokuuye K, Okumura T. et al. Clinical results of proton beam therapy for skull base chordoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 60 (04) 1120-1126
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Jägersberg M, El Rahal A, Dammann P, Merkler D, Weber DC, Schaller K. Clival chordoma: a single-centre outcome analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159 (10) 1815-1823
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 McDonald MW, Linton OR, Moore MG, Ting JY, Cohen-Gadol AA, Shah MV. Influence of residual tumor volume and radiation dose coverage in outcomes for clival chordoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95 (01) 304-311
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Noël G, Feuvret L, Calugaru V. et al. Chordomas of the base of the skull and upper cervical spine. One hundred patients irradiated by a 3D conformal technique combining photon and proton beams. Acta Oncol 2005; 44 (07) 700-708
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Terahara A, Niemierko A, Goitein M. et al. Analysis of the relationship between tumor dose inhomogeneity and local control in patients with skull base chordoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 45 (02) 351-358
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Weber DC, Malyapa R, Albertini F. et al. Long term outcomes of patients with skull-base low-grade chondrosarcoma and chordoma patients treated with pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Radiother Oncol 2016; 120 (01) 169-174
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Bugoci DM, Girvigian MR, Chen JC, Miller MM, Rahimian J. Photon-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for postoperative treatment of skull base chordomas. Am J Clin Oncol 2013; 36 (04) 404-410
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Debus J, Schulz-Ertner D, Schad L. et al. Stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47 (03) 591-596
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Hauptman JS, Barkhoudarian G, Safaee M. et al. Challenges in linear accelerator radiotherapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: focus on complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 83 (02) 542-551
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Sahgal A, Chan MW, Atenafu EG. et al. Image-guided, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) for skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma: preliminary outcomes. Neuro-oncol 2015; 17 (06) 889-894
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Zorlu F, Gürkaynak M, Yildiz F, Oge K, Atahan IL. Conventional external radiotherapy in the management of clivus chordomas with overt residual disease. Neurol Sci 2000; 21 (04) 203-207
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Chang SD, Martin DP, Lee E, Adler Jr JR. Stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for residual or recurrent cranial base and cervical chordomas. Neurosurg Focus 2001; 10 (03) E5
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 56 Hafez RFA, Fahmy OM, Hassan HT. Gamma knife surgery efficacy in controlling postoperative residual clival chordoma growth. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019; 178: 51-55
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 57 Kano H, Iqbal FO, Sheehan J. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for chordoma: a report from the North American Gamma Knife Consortium. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (02) 379-389
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 58 Koga T, Shin M, Saito N. Treatment with high marginal dose is mandatory to achieve long-term control of skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas by means of stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2010; 98 (02) 233-238
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 59 Krishnan S, Foote RL, Brown PD, Pollock BE, Link MJ, Garces YI. Radiosurgery for cranial base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (04) 777-784 , discussion 777–784
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 60 Liu AL, Wang ZC, Sun SB, Wang MH, Luo B, Liu P. Gamma knife radiosurgery for residual skull base chordomas. Neurol Res 2008; 30 (06) 557-561
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 61 Miller RC, Foote RL, Coffey RJ. et al. The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of malignant skull base tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39 (05) 977-981
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 62 Muthukumar N, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC. Stereotactic radiosurgery for chordoma and chondrosarcoma: further experiences. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 41 (02) 387-392
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 63 Zakaria WK, Hafez RF, Taha AN. Gamma knife management of skull base chordomas: is it a choice?. Asian J Neurosurg 2018; 13 (04) 1037-1041
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 64 Sen C, Triana AI, Berglind N, Godbold J, Shrivastava RK. Clival chordomas: clinical management, results, and complications in 71 patients. J Neurosurg 2010; 113 (05) 1059-1071
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 65 Zhai Y, Bai J, Wang S. et al. Analysis of clinical factors and PDGFR-β in predicting prognosis of patients with clival chordoma. J Neurosurg 2018; 129 (06) 1429-1437
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 66 Sanna M, Mazzoni A, Gamoletti R. The system of the modified transcochlear approaches to the petroclival area and the prepontine cistern. Skull Base Surg 1996; 6 (04) 237-248
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 67 Shimony N, Gonen L, Shofty B, Abergel A, Fliss DM, Margalit N. Surgical resection of skull-base chordomas: experience in case selection for surgical approach according to anatomical compartments and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159 (10) 1835-1845
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 68 Fatemi N, Dusick JR, Gorgulho AA. et al. Endonasal microscopic removal of clival chordomas. Surg Neurol 2008; 69 (04) 331-338
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 69 Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. The endoscope-assisted ventral approach compared with open microscope-assisted surgery for clival chordomas. World Neurosurg 2011; 76 (3-4): discussion 259–262 318-327
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 70 Stacchiotti S, Sommer J. Chordoma Global Consensus Group. Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: a position paper from the medical and patient community. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (02) e71-e83
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 71 Pamir MN, Kiliç T, Türe U, Ozek MM. Multimodality management of 26 skull-base chordomas with 4-year mean follow-up: experience at a single institution. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004; 146 (04) 343-354 , 354
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 72 Mohan R, Grosshans D. Proton therapy: present and future. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017; 109: 26-44
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 73 Smoll NR, Gautschi OP, Radovanovic I, Schaller K, Weber DC. Incidence and relative survival of chordomas: the standardized mortality ratio and the impact of chordomas on a population. Cancer 2013; 119 (11) 2029-2037
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 74 Matloob SA, Nasir HA, Choi D. Proton beam therapy in the management of skull base chordomas: systematic review of indications, outcomes, and implications for neurosurgeons. Br J Neurosurg 2016; 30 (04) 382-387
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar