Utilization of Telestroke Prior to and Following the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

For over two decades, telestroke has been utilized as a means for improving acute access to a stroke specialist when this expertise is otherwise unavailable. During this time, telestroke use has increased and improvements in care metrics have been widely reported. Several telestroke model variations are utilized; each has different workflow implications. A successful telestroke system should include adequate protocols and training, equipment, documentation system, and tracking of quality metrics. Upfront costs of needed technology and devices, credentialing hurdles, and limited reimbursement are all reported barriers to the utilization of telestroke. Emphasis on safety measures during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the dramatic upscaling of telehealth utilization, although overall stroke volumes declined in many areas in the early phases of the pandemic. Going forward, continued reduction in cost of required devices and broadband connections, increased use of automated and advanced analytical software, and a universal licensing and credentialing system are needed to continue the expansion of telestroke use.

Keywords

telestroke - alteplase - stroke - technology

Publication History

Article published online:
16 May 2022

• References

• 1 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995; 333 (24) 1581-1587
• 2 Saver JL. Time is brain–quantified. Stroke 2006; 37 (01) 263-266
• 3 Lees KR, Bluhmki E, von Kummer R. et al; ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS and EPITHET rt-PA Study Group. Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet 2010; 375 (9727): 1695-1703
• 4 Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E. et al; ECASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008; 359 (13) 1317-1329
• 5 Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T. et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2019; 50 (12) e344-e418
• 6 Adeoye O, Albright KC, Carr BG. et al. Geographic access to acute stroke care in the United States. Stroke 2014; 45 (10) 3019-3024
• 7 Seabury S, Bognar K, Xu Y, Huber C, Commerford SR, Tayama D. Regional disparities in the quality of stroke care. Am J Emerg Med 2017; 35 (09) 1234-1239
• 8 Messé SR, Khatri P, Reeves MJ. et al. Why are acute ischemic stroke patients not receiving IV tPA? Results from a national registry. Neurology 2016; 87 (15) 1565-1574
• 9 Barber PA, Zhang J, Demchuk AM, Hill MD, Buchan AM. Why are stroke patients excluded from TPA therapy? An analysis of patient eligibility. Neurology 2001; 56 (08) 1015-1020
• 10 Tilley BC, Lyden PD, Brott TG, Lu M, Levine SR, Welch KM. Total quality improvement method for reduction of delays between emergency department admission and treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Arch Neurol 1997; 54 (12) 1466-1474
• 11 Brown DL, Barsan WG, Lisabeth LD, Gallery ME, Morgenstern LB. Survey of emergency physicians about recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 46 (01) 56-60
• 12 Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR. et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282 (15) 1458-1465
• 13 Lustig TA, Tracy AL. Institute of Medicine. The Role of Telehealth in an Evolving Health Care Environment: Workshop Summary. National Academies Press; 2012
• 14 Wittson CL, Affleck DC, Johnson V. Two-way television in group therapy. Ment Hosp 1961; 12: 22-23
• 15 Choi PJ, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS. Telesurgery: past, present, and future. Cureus 2018; 10 (05) e2716
• 16 Feroz A, Mohammed Feroz TP, Bastian TS, Selvamani M. Telepathology: an update on applications, latest advances, and current status in Indian scenario. J Cancer Res Ther 2020; 16 (04) 703-707
• 17 Hanna TN, Steenburg SD, Rosenkrantz AB, Pyatt Jr RS, Duszak Jr R, Friedberg EB. Emerging challenges and opportunities in the evolution of teleradiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 215 (06) 1411-1416
• 18 Kane-Gill SL, Rincon F. Expansion of telemedicine services: telepharmacy, telestroke, teledialysis, tele-emergency medicine. Crit Care Clin 2019; 35 (03) 519-533
• 19 Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P. et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2009; 40 (07) 2616-2634
• 20 Wechsler LR, Demaerschalk BM, Schwamm LH. et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Telemedicine quality and outcomes in stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2017; 48 (01) e3-e25
• 21 Zhang D, Shi L, Ido MS. et al. Impact of participation in a telestroke network on clinical outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2019; 12 (01) e005147
• 22 Levine SR, Gorman M. “Telestroke”: the application of telemedicine for stroke. Stroke 1999; 30 (02) 464-469
• 23 Hess DC, Audebert HJ. The history and future of telestroke. Nat Rev Neurol 2013; 9 (06) 340-350
• 24 Gagliano DM, Xiao Y. Mobile telemedicine testbed. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1997; 383-387
• 25 LaMonte MP, Cullen J, Gagliano DM. et al; Brain Attack Team. TeleBAT: mobile telemedicine for the Brain Attack Team. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2000; 9 (03) 128-135
• 26 Fassbender K, Grotta JC, Walter S, Grunwald IQ, Ragoschke-Schumm A, Saver JL. Mobile stroke units for prehospital thrombolysis, triage, and beyond: benefits and challenges. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16 (03) 227-237
• 27 Silva GS, Farrell S, Shandra E, Viswanathan A, Schwamm LH. The status of telestroke in the United States: a survey of currently active stroke telemedicine programs. Stroke 2012; 43 (08) 2078-2085
• 28 Shafqat S, Kvedar JC, Guanci MM, Chang Y, Schwamm LH. Role for telemedicine in acute stroke. Feasibility and reliability of remote administration of the NIH stroke scale. Stroke 1999; 30 (10) 2141-2145
• 29 Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T. et al. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7 (09) 787-795
• 30 Müller-Barna P, Hubert GJ, Boy S. et al. TeleStroke units serving as a model of care in rural areas: 10-year experience of the TeleMedical project for integrative stroke care. Stroke 2014; 45 (09) 2739-2744
• 31 Amorim E, Shih MM, Koehler SA. et al. Impact of telemedicine implementation in thrombolytic use for acute ischemic stroke: the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center telestroke network experience. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22 (04) 527-531
• 32 Schwamm LH, Audebert HJ, Amarenco P. et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Recommendations for the implementation of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009; 40 (07) 2635-2660
• 33 Sanders KA, Patel R, Kiely JM, Gwynn MW, Johnston LH. Improving telestroke treatment times in an expanding network of hospitals. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016; 25 (02) 288-291
• 34 Sharma R, Zachrison KS, Viswanathan A. et al. Trends in telestroke care delivery: a 15-year experience of an academic hub and its network of spokes. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2020; 13 (03) e005903
• 35 Schwamm LH, Rosenthal ES, Hirshberg A. et al. Virtual TeleStroke support for the emergency department evaluation of acute stroke. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11 (11) 1193-1197
• 36 Zanaty M, Chalouhi N, Starke RM. et al. Epidemiology of a large telestroke cohort in the Delaware valley. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014; 125: 143-147
• 37 Pervez MA, Silva G, Masrur S. et al. Remote supervision of IV-tPA for acute ischemic stroke by telemedicine or telephone before transfer to a regional stroke center is feasible and safe. Stroke 2010; 41 (01) e18-e24
• 38 Kepplinger J, Dzialowski I, Barlinn K. et al. Emergency transfer of acute stroke patients within the East Saxony telemedicine stroke network: a descriptive analysis. Int J Stroke 2014; 9 (02) 160-165
• 39 Switzer JA, Demaerschalk BM, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, Wu EQ. Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals' perspectives. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013; 6 (01) 18-26
• 40 Demaerschalk BM, Switzer JA, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, Wu EQ. Cost utility of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks from societal perspective. Am J Manag Care 2013; 19 (12) 976-985
• 41 Zhao G, Huang H, Yang F. The progress of telestroke in China. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2017; 2 (03) 168-171
• 42 Ohannessian R, Schott AM, Colin C, Nighoghossian N, Medeiros de Bustos E, Moulin T. Acute telestroke in France: a systematic review. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2020; 176 (05) 316-324
• 43 Richard JV, Wilcock AD, Schwamm LH. et al. Assessment of telestroke capacity in US hospitals. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77 (08) 1035-1037
• 44 Demaerschalk BM, Berg J, Chong BW. et al. American Telemedicine Association: telestroke guidelines. Telemed J E Health 2017; 23 (05) 376-389
• 45 Etherton MR, Schwamm LH. Telestroke for the newly minted vascular neurologist. Stroke 2018; 49 (04) e162-e164
• 46 Elrod JK, Fortenberry Jr JL. The hub-and-spoke organization design: an avenue for serving patients well. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17 (Suppl. 01) 457
• 47 Switzer JA, Levine SR, Hess DC. Telestroke 10 years later–‘telestroke 2.0’. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 28 (04) 323-330
• 48 Parker C, Schwamm LH, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Reeves MJ. Stroke quality metrics: systematic reviews of the relationships to patient-centered outcomes and impact of public reporting. Stroke 2012; 43 (01) 155-162
• 49 Adeoye O, Nyström KV, Yavagal DR. et al. Recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care: a 2019 update. Stroke 2019; 50 (07) e187-e210
• 50 Saposnik G, Di Legge S, Webster F, Hachinski V. Predictors of major neurologic improvement after thrombolysis in acute stroke. Neurology 2005; 65 (08) 1169-1174
• 51 Schwamm LH, Fonarow GC, Reeves MJ. et al. Get with the guidelines - stroke is associated with sustained improvement in care for patients hospitalized with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack. Circulation 2009; 119 (01) 107-115
• 52 Mullen MT, Kasner SE, Kallan MJ, Kleindorfer DO, Albright KC, Carr BG. Joint commission primary stroke centers utilize more rt-PA in the nationwide inpatient sample. J Am Heart Assoc 2013; 2 (02) e000071
• 53 Shahraki AD, Ghabaee M, Shahmoradi L, Malak JS, Jazani MR, Safdari R. Smart acute stroke quality registry design - data elements identification. J Registry Manag 2018; 45 (01) 43-47
• 54 Yang JP, Wu TC, Tegeler C, Xian Y, Olson DM, Kolls BJ. Targeting telestroke: benchmarking time performance in telestroke consultations. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22 (04) 470-475
• 55 Quain DA, Parsons MW, Loudfoot AR. et al. Improving access to acute stroke therapies: a controlled trial of organised pre-hospital and emergency care. Med J Aust 2008; 189 (08) 429-433
• 56 Caminiti C, Schulz P, Marcomini B. et al; Educazione e Ritardo di Ospedalizzazione (E.R.O.I) Study Group. Development of an education campaign to reduce delays in pre-hospital response to stroke. BMC Emerg Med 2017; 17 (01) 20
• 57 Ajmi SC, Advani R, Fjetland L. et al. Reducing door-to-needle times in stroke thrombolysis to 13 min through protocol revision and simulation training: a quality improvement project in a Norwegian stroke centre. BMJ Qual Saf 2019; 28 (11) 939-948
• 58 Switzer JA, Demaerschalk BM. Overcoming challenges to sustain a telestroke network. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 21 (07) 535-540
• 59 French B, Day E, Watkins C. et al. The challenges of implementing a telestroke network: a systematic review and case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13: 125
• 60 Stradling DA. Telestroke: state of the science and steps for implementation. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2009; 21 (04) 541-548
• 61 Rogove HJ, McArthur D, Demaerschalk BM, Vespa PM. Barriers to telemedicine: survey of current users in acute care units. Telemed J E Health 2012; 18 (01) 48-53
• 62 Weinstein RS, Lopez AM, Joseph BA. et al. Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: opportunities and barriers. Am J Med 2014; 127 (03) 183-187
• 63 Lieneck C, Garvey J, Collins C, Graham D, Loving C, Pearson R. Rapid telehealth implementation during the COVID-19 global pandemic: a rapid review. Healthcare (Basel) 2020; 8 (04) E517
• 64 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Telehealth: Delivering Care Safely during COVID-19. 2020 [cited 2021; Accessed December 27, 2021 at: https://www.hhs.gov/coronavirus/telehealth/index.html
• 65 Demaerschalk BM. Telemedicine or telephone consultation in patients with acute stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2011; 11 (01) 42-51
• 66 Clark PA, Capuzzi K, Harrison J. Telemedicine: medical, legal and ethical perspectives. Med Sci Monit 2010; 16 (12) RA261-RA272
• 67 Lonergan PE, Washington III SL, Branagan L. et al. Rapid utilization of telehealth in a comprehensive cancer center as a response to COVID-19: cross-sectional analysis. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (07) e19322
• 68 Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (18) 1679-1681
• 69 Center for Connected Heath Policy. COVID-19 telehealth coverage policies. 2020 [cited 2021 February 1, 2021]; Accessed December 27, 2021 at: https://www.cchpca.org/resources/covid-19-telehealth-coverage-policies
• 70 HHS.gov. Notification of enforcement discretion for telehealth. 2020 [cited 2021 February 8, 2021]; Accessed December 27, 2021 at: https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/emergency-preparedness/notification-enforcement-discretion-telehealth/index.html
• 71 Zhao J, Li H, Kung D, Fisher M, Shen Y, Liu R. Impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on stroke care and potential solutions. Stroke 2020; 51 (07) 1996-2001
• 72 Teo KC, Leung WCY, Wong YK. et al. Delays in stroke onset to hospital arrival time during COVID-19. Stroke 2020; 51 (07) 2228-2231
• 73 Kerleroux B, Fabacher T, Bricout N. et al; SFNR, the ETIS registry, and the JENI-Research Collaborative. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke amid the COVID-19 outbreak: decreased activity, and increased care delays. Stroke 2020; 51 (07) 2012-2017
• 74 Shah SO, Dharia R, Stazi J, DePrince M, Rosenwasser RH. Rapid decline in telestroke consults in the setting of COVID-19. Telemed J E Health 2021; 27 (02) 227-230
• 75 Huang JF, Greenway MRF, Nasr DM. et al. Telestroke in the time of COVID-19: the Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; 95 (08) 1704-1708
• 76 Leira EC, Russman AN, Biller J. et al. Preserving stroke care during the COVID-19 pandemic: potential issues and solutions. Neurology 2020; 95 (03) 124-133
• 77 Wechsler LR. Advantages and limitations of teleneurology. JAMA Neurol 2015; 72 (03) 349-354
• 78 Stefano GB, Kream RM. The micro-hospital: 5G telemedicine-based care. Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2018; 24: 103-104
• 79 Ye J. The role of health technology and informatics in a global public health emergency: practices and implications from the COVID-19 pandemic. JMIR Med Inform 2020; 8 (07) e19866
• 80 Byrne D, Walsh JP, MacMahon PJ. An acute stroke CT imaging algorithm incorporating automated perfusion analysis. Emerg Radiol 2019; 26 (03) 319-329
• 81 Straka M, Albers GW, Bammer R. Real-time diffusion-perfusion mismatch analysis in acute stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 32 (05) 1024-1037
• 82 Maegerlein C, Fischer J, Mönch S. et al. Automated calculation of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score: feasibility and reliability. Radiology 2019; 291 (01) 141-148
• 83 Ma H, Campbell BCV, Parsons MW. et al; EXTEND Investigators. Thrombolysis guided by perfusion imaging up to 9 hours after onset of stroke. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (19) 1795-1803
• 84 Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC. et al; DAWN Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 2018; 378 (01) 11-21
• 85 Albers GW, Lansberg MG, Kemp S. et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of endovascular therapy following imaging evaluation for ischemic stroke (DEFUSE 3). Int J Stroke 2017; 12 (08) 896-905
• 86 Schwamm LH, Wu O, Song SS. et al; MR WITNESS Investigators. Intravenous thrombolysis in unwitnessed stroke onset: MR WITNESS trial results. Ann Neurol 2018; 83 (05) 980-993
• 87 Rodriguez-Prunotto L, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R. [Mobile applications related to stroke: a systematic review]. Rev Neurol 2018; 66 (07) 213-229
• 88 Kamal H, Lopez V, Sheth SA. Machine learning in acute ischemic stroke neuroimaging. Front Neurol 2018; 9: 945
• 89 Feng R, Badgeley M, Mocco J, Oermann EK. Deep learning guided stroke management: a review of clinical applications. J Neurointerv Surg 2018; 10 (04) 358-362
• 90 Li MD, Lang M, Deng F. et al. Analysis of stroke detection during the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing of radiology reports. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42 (03) 429-434
• 91 Halbert K, Bautista C. Telehealth use to promote quality outcomes and reduce costs in stroke care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2019; 31 (02) 133-139
• 92 McCauley JL, Swartz AE. Reframing telehealth: regulation, licensing, and reimbursement in connected care. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2020; 47 (02) 227-239
• 93 Marshall M, Shah R, Stokes-Lampard H. Online consulting in general practice: making the move from disruptive innovation to mainstream service. BMJ 2018; 360: k1195
• 94 Blackman K. Telehealth and licensing interstate providers. NCSL Legisbrief 2016; 24 (25) 1-2