Letter to the Editor: Single- vs. Double-Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery

Ultraschall Med 2017; 38(04): 448-449
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-101519

Letter to the Editor

Suzanne Demers

¹Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

,

Emmanuel Bujold

²Obstetrics & Gynecology, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada

,

Stephanie Roberge

¹Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

References
1 Bamberg C. Dudenhausen JW. Bujak V. et al. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single vs. Double Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: The Effect on Uterine Scar Thickness. Ultraschall in Med 2016;
2 Roberge S. Demers S. Girard M. et al. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214: 507 e1-507 e6
3 Roberge S. Chaillet N. Boutin A. et al. Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 115: 5-10
4 Algert CS. Morris JM. Simpson JM. et al. Labor before a primary cesarean delivery: reduced risk of uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 1061-1066