Download PDF
Ultraschall Med 2019; 40(01): 40-46
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-119872
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Jellyfish Sign: A New Sonographic Cervical Marker to Predict Maternal Morbidity in Abnormally Invasive Placenta Previa

Das Jellyfish-Sign: Ein neuer sonografischer zervikaler Marker um die mütterliche Morbidität bei ungewöhnlich invasiver Placenta Previa vorherzusagen
Emma Bertucci
1   Prenatal Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
,
Filomena Giulia Sileo
1   Prenatal Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
,
Giovanni Grandi
2   Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
,
Valentina Fenu
1   Prenatal Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
,
Carlotta Cani
1   Prenatal Medicine Unit, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
,
Luciano Mancini
3   Institute of Anatomic Pathology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
,
Ema Mataca
3   Institute of Anatomic Pathology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
,
Fabio Facchinetti
2   Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

30 January 2017

08 September 2017

Publication Date:
21 November 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the value of a new cervical sonographic sign, called the jellyfish sign (JS), for predicting the risk of maternal morbidity in cases of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) previa totalis.

Materials and Methods Retrospective evaluation of transvaginal (TV) and transabdominal (TA) scans performed in all singleton pregnancies with placenta previa totalis. JS, i. e. the absence of the normal linear demarcation between the placenta previa and the cervix, was evaluated by TV scans. The presence/severity of AIP and outcomes of maternal morbidity were related to this sign.

Results JS was noted in 8/39 (20.5 %) patients. The two analyzed groups, i. e. with and without JS, were similar. The specificity of JS in AIP diagnosis, histological findings of accreta/increta/percreta, need for caesarean hysterectomy or blood loss > 2000 ml ranges between 92 % and 96.2 %, with the PPV and NPV ranging between 71.4 % and 85.7 % and 61.3 % and 80.6 %, respectively. The JS group had a significant increase in blood loss (ml) (p = 0.003), transfusions (%) (p = 0.016), red blood cells (p = 0.002) and plasma (p = 0.002), admission to an postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) (%) (p = 0.002), hospitalization length (p < 0.001) and the need of cesarean hysterectomy (%) (p < 0.001). JS was independently correlated to cesarean hysterectomy (OR 25.6; 95 % CI 2.0:322.3, p = 0.012) and blood loss > 2000 ml (OR 16.6; 95 % CI 1.5:180.1, p = 0.021) also in a logistic regression model.

Conclusion JS is useful in predicting the increase in maternal morbidity: massive transfusion, admission to the ICU and cesarean hysterectomy related to intraoperative bleeding in patients with a previa AIP.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Beurteilung eines neuen sonografischen zervikalen Markers, dem sogenannten Jellyfish-Sign (JS), zur Prognose des Risikos der mütterlichen Morbidität bei ungewöhnlich invasiver Plazenta (AIP) previa totalis. Materialien und Methoden: Retrospektive Auswertung der transvaginalen (TV) und transabdominalen (TA) Scans in allen Einlingsschwangerschaften mit placenta previa totalis. JS, also die Abwesenheit der deutlichen Abgrenzung zwischen der Plazenta previa und dem Gebärmutterhals, wurde mittels TV-Scans ausgewertet. Das Vorkommen / die Schwere der AIP und die Häufigkeit der mütterlichen Morbidität standen mit dem JS in Relation.

Ergebnisse JS wurde bei 8/39 (20,5 %) der Patienten festgestellt. Die beiden analysierten Gruppen, das heißt mit und ohne JS, waren ähnlich. Die Spezifität von JS zur AIP-Diagnose, bei histologischen Befunden von accreta / increta / percreta, zur Notwendigkeit für Kaiserschnitt oder bei Blutverlust > 2000ml lag zwischen 92 % und 96,2 %, mit dem PPV und NPV zwischen 71,4 % und 85,7 % und 61,3 % und 80,6 %. Die JS-Gruppe hatte einen deutlich höheren Blutverlust (ml) (p = 0,003), benötigte mehr Transfusionen (%) (p = 0,016) sowie rote Blutzellen (p = 0,002) und Plasma (p = 0,002), höhere Aufnahmerate in einer postoperativen Intensivstation (ICU) (%) (p = 0,002), Hospitalisierungslänge (p < 0,001) und die Notwendigkeit eines Kaiserschnitts (%) (p < 0,001). JS korrelierte unabhängig zu Kaiserschnitt- (OR 25,6; 95 % CI 2,0: 322,3, p = 0,012) und Blutverlust > 2000 ml (OR 16,6, 95 % CI 1,5: 180,1, p = 0,021), auch in einem logistischen Regressionsmodell.

Schlussfolgerung Das JS ist hilfreich zur Prognose der Zunahme von mütterlicher Morbidität: höhere Transfusionraten, Aufnahme in ein ICU und Kaiserschnitt stehen im Zusammenhang mit intraoperativer Blutungen bei Patienten mit einer Previa AIP.

Key Words

placenta accreta - morbidly adherent placenta - ultrasound - cervix - maternal morbidity
 

  • References

  • 1 Oyelese Y, Smulian JC. Placenta praevia, placenta accreta, and vasa praevia. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 927-941
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta praevia/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 89-92
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists Number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 1039-1047
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB. et al. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Garmi G, Salim R. Epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and management of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012; 2012: 873929
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Comstock CH. The antenatal diagnosis of placental attachment disorders. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 23: 117-122
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB. et al. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 21-26
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Wortman AC, Alexander JM. Placenta accreta, increta, and percreta. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2013; 40: 137-154 doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.12.002. Review
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Belfort MA. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 430-439
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 D’Antonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet 2013; 42: 509-517
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Wong HS, Cheung YK, Zuccollo J. et al. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for placenta accreta. J Clin Ultrasound 2008; 9: 551-559
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Collins SL, Ashcroft A, Braun T. et al. Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47 (03) 271-275
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Gilboa Y, Spira M, Mazaki-Tovi S. et al. A novel sonographic scoring system for antenatal risk assessment of obstetric complications in suspected morbidly adherent placenta. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34: 561-567 doi: 10.7863/ultra.34.4.561
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Tovbin J, Melcer Y, Shor S. et al. Prediction of morbidly adherent placenta using a scoring system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 504-510 doi: 10.1002/uog.15813
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Jauniaux E, Collins SL, Jurkovic D. et al. Accreta placentation: a systematic review of prenatal ultrasound imaging and grading of villous invasiveness. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215: 712-721 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.044
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH. International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 500-505
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta praevia-placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 210-214
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation: twentyyear analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1458-1461
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P. et al. Incidence and risk factors for placenta accreta/increta/percreta in the UK: a national case-control study. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e52893
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Gielchinsky Y, Rojansky N, Fasouliotis SJ. et al. Placenta accreta—summary of 10 years: a survey of 310 cases. Placenta 2002; 23: 210-214
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Bowman ZS, Eller AG, Bardsley TR. et al. Risk factors for placenta accreta: a large prospective cohort. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31: 799-804
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Thurn L, Lindqvist PG, Jakobsson M. et al. Abnormally invasive placenta-prevalence, risk factors and antenatal suspicion: results from a large population-based pregnancy cohort study in the Nordic countries. BJOG 2016; 123: 1348-1355 doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13547
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Bodner LJ, Nosher JL, Gribbin C. et al. Balloon-assisted occlusion of the internal iliac arteries in patients with placenta accreta/percreta. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006; 29: 354-361
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Eller AG, Porter TF, Soisson P. et al. Optimal management strategies for placenta accreta. BJOG 2009; 116: 648-654
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Hoffman MS, Karlnoski RA, Mangar D. et al. Morbidity associated with nonemergent hysterectomy for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202: 628.e1-628.e5
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Warshak CR, Ramos GA, Eskander R. et al. Effect of predelivery diagnosis in 99 consecutive cases of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 65-69
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Carnevale FC, Kondo MM, De Oliveira Jr SW. et al. Perioperative temporary occlusion of the internal iliac arteries as prophylaxis in cesarean section at risk of hemorrhage in placenta accreta. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34: 758-764
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Tikkanen M, Paavonen J, Loukovaara M. et al. Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta leads to reduced blood loss. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90: 1140-1146
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Chandraharan E, Rao S, Belli AM. et al. The Triple- P procedure as a conservative surgical alternative to peripartum hysterectomy for placenta percreta. Int J GynaecolObstet 2012; 117: 191-194
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar