Literatur
-
1
Achilles S K, Bühling K J, Stein U, Dudenhausen J W.
Einfluss der Nahrungsanamnese auf den 50 g
Glukose-Screeningtest.
Arch Gynecol
Obstet.
1998;
261
S54
(Suppl
1))
-
2
American Diabetes Association (ADA) .
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.
Diabetes
Care.
2002;
25
(Suppl
1)
S94-96
-
3
Bühling K J, Dudenhausen J W.
Teststreifenanalyse und Harnsediment.
Dtsch Med
Wochenschr.
2002;
161
1718
-
4
Bühling K J, Stein U, Dudenhausen J W.
Evaluation des 50 g-Glukose-Screeningtests an 1416
Schwangeren.
Geburtsh
Frauenheilk.
1998;
58
100-109
-
5
Bühling K J, Stein U, Dudenhausen J W.
Vorhersagewert des „normalen” 50
g-Glukose-Screeningtest für den Geburtsverlauf und das „fetal
outcome”.
Arch Gynecol
Obstet.
1998;
261
S
53
(Suppl 1)
-
6
Carpenter M, Coustan D.
Criteria for screening tests for gestational
diabetes.
Am J Obstet
Gynecol.
1982;
144
768-773
-
7
Çetin M, Çetin A.
Time-dependent gestational diabetes screening
values.
Intern J Gynecol
Obstet.
1997;
56
257-261
-
8
Coustan D R, Widness J A, Carpenter M W, Rotondo L, Pratt D C, Oh W.
Should the 50 g, one-hour plasma glucose screening
test for gestational diabetes be administered in the fasting or fed
state?.
Am J Obstet
Gynecol.
1986;
154
103-105
-
9
Deutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft .
Diagnostik und Therapie des Gestationsdiabetes. Richtlinien
der Deutschen Diabetes Gesellschaft
1992.
Frauenarzt.
1993;
34
13-14
-
10 Deutsche D iabetes Gesellschaft. Diagnostik und Therapie des
Gestationsdiabetes. (erhältlich unter
http://www.deutsche-diabetes-gesellschaft.de Updated Juni
2001)
-
11
Hadden D R. et al .
The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study:
a work in
progress.
Diabetologia.
2002;
45
(Suppl
2)
A 294
-
12
Hooper D W.
Detecting GD and Preeclampsia. Effectiveness of Routine Urine
Screening for Glucose and Protein.
J Reprod
Med.
1996;
41
885-888
-
13
Kim H S, Chang K H, Yang J I. et al .
Clinical outcomes of pregnancy with one elevated glucose
tolerance test value.
Intern J Gynecol
Obstet.
2002;
78
131-138
-
14
Kjos S, Buchanan T.
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.
N Engl J
Med.
1999;
341
1749-1756
-
15
Kleinwechter H.
The government sponsored model project Gestational diabetes
(GDM) Schleswig-Holstein: Prevalence and foetal outcome in unselected pregnant
women following the successful implementation of screening for
GDM.
Diabetologia.
2000;
43
(Suppl
1)
A 56
-
16
Langer O, Anyaegbunam A, Brustman L, Divon M.
Management of woment with one abnormal oral glucose tolerance
test value reduces adverse outcome in pregnancy.
Am J Obstet
Gynecol.
1989;
161
593-599
-
17
Langer O, Brustman L, Anyaegbunam A. et al .
Glycemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus - how
tight is tight enough: small for gestational age versus large for gestational
age?.
Am J Obstet
Gynecol.
1989;
161
646-653
-
18
O`Sullivan J, Mahan C.
Criteria for the oral glucose tolerance test in
pregnancy.
Diabetes.
1964;
13
278-285
-
19
Parretti E, Mecacci F, Papini M. et al .
Third-Trimester Maternal Glucose Levels From Diurnal Profiles
in Nondiabetic Pregnancies.
Diabetes
Care.
2001;
24
1319-1323
-
20
Sacks D A, Abu-Fadil S, Karten G J. et al .
Screening for gestational diabetes with the one-hour 50 g
glucose test.
Obstet
Gynecol.
1987;
70
89-93
-
21
Sermer M, Naylor D, Gare D J. et al .
Impact of time since last meal on the gestational glucose
challenge test.
Am J Obstet
Gynecol.
1994;
171
607-616
-
22
Tallarigo L, Giampietro O, Penno G. et al .
Relation of Glucose Tolerance to Complications of Pregnancy
in Nondiabetic Women.
N Engl J
Med.
1986;
315
989-992
-
23
Weiss P A, Haeusler M, Kainer F, Purstner P, Haas J.
Toward universal criteria for gestational diabetes:
relationships between seventy-five and one hundred gram glucose loads and
between capillary and venous glucose concentrations.
Am J Obstet
Gynecol.
1998;
178
830-835
-
24 Weiss P A. Diabetes und Schwangerschaft. Heidelberg:
Springer 2002: 267
Dr. med. Kai J. Bühling
Klinik für Geburtsmedizin, Charité Campus
Virchow-Klinikum
Augustenburger Platz 1
13353 Berlin
Phone: 030/450564293
Fax: 030/450564901
Email: kai.buehling@charite.de