Semin Plast Surg 2003; 17(4): 387-394
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-817711
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Reconstruction of the Oral Cavity

Scott L. Hansen, Pablo León
  • Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 April 2004 (online)

ABSTRACT

The oral cavity participates in mastication, deglutition, and speech. Extirpative defects result in loss of form and function. Reconstruction of these defects is challenging. However, advances in microsurgery have allowed the surgeon to achieve better function and aesthetics in the reconstruction of oral cavity defects. The use of innervated flaps has been successful in some centers, providing sensation to the oral cavity, enhancing the ability to sense ingested food in the mouth, and facilitating mastication. The radial forearm flap remains the workhorse for coverage of the majority of oral cavity defects. Reconstruction of total glossectomy defects continues to evolve with better results, although fine motor function still cannot be achieved. Although the majority of patients with large, invasive oral cancers succumb to their disease, reconstructive surgery can vastly improve the quality of their remaining life.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Hufnagle J, Pullon P, Hufnagle K. Speech considerations in oral surgery, II: speech characteristics of patients following surgery for oral malignancies.  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol . 1978;  46 354-361
  • 2 McConnell F MS. Analysis of pressure generation and bolus transit during pharyngeal swallowing.  Laryngoscope . 1988;  98 71-78
  • 3 Haughey B H. Tongue reconstruction: concepts and practice.  Laryngoscope . 1993;  103 1132-1141
  • 4 Spiro R H, Strong E W. Surgical treatment of cancer of the tongue.  Surg Clin North Am . 1974;  54 759-765
  • 5 Sultan M R, Coleman J J. Oncologic and functional considerations of total glossectomy.  Am J Surg . 1989;  158 297-302
  • 6 McGregor I A. The pursuit of function and cosmesis in managing oral cancer.  Br J Plast Surg . 1993;  46 22-31
  • 7 Soutar D S, Scheker L R, Tanner N SB, McGregor I A. The radial forearm flap: a versatile method for intra-oral reconstruction.  Br J Plast Surg . 1983;  36 1-8
  • 8 Soutar D S, McGregor I A. The radial forearm flap in intraoral reconstruction: the experience of 60 consecutive cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1986;  78 1-8
  • 9 Boyd B, Mulholland S, Gullane P. et al . Reinnervated lateral antebrachial cutaneous neurosome flaps in oral reconstruction: are we making sense?.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1994;  93 1350-1359
  • 10 Santamaria E, Wei F-C, Chen I-H, Chuang D. Sensation recovery on innervated radial forearm flap for hemiglossectomy reconstruction by using different recipient nerves.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  103 450-457
  • 11 Kuriakose M A, Loree T R, Spies A, Meyers S, Hicks W L. Sensate radial forearm free flaps in tongue reconstruction.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2001;  127 1463-1466
  • 12 Cordeiro P G, Schwartz M, Neves R I, Tuma R. A comparison of donor and recipient site sensation if free tissue reconstruction of the oral cavity.  Ann Plast Surg . 1997;  39 461-468
  • 13 Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S. et al . Comparison of innervated and noninnervated free flaps in oral reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  104 1307-1313
  • 14 Netscher D, Armenta A H, Meade R A, Alford E L. Sensory recovery of innervated and non-innervated radial forearm free flaps: functional implications.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 2000;  16 179-185
  • 15 Vriens J PM, Acosta R, Soutar D S, Webster M HC. Recovery of sensation in the radial forearm free flap in oral reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1996;  98 649-656
  • 16 Turkof E, Jurecka W, Sikos G, Piza-Katezar H. Sensory recovery in myocutaneous noninnervated free flaps: a morphologic, immunohistochemical and electron microscopic study.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1993;  92 238-247
  • 17 Close L G, Truelson J M, Milledge R A, Schweitzer C. Sensory recovery in noninnervated flaps used for oral cavity and oropharyngeal reconstruction.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1995;  121 967-972
  • 18 Lutz B S, Wei F-C. Microsurgical reconstruction of the buccal mucosa.  Clin Plast Surg . 2001;  28 339-347
  • 19 Yousif N J, Matloub H S, Sanger J R, Campbell B. Soft-tissue reconstruction of the oral cavity.  Clin Plast Surg . 1994;  21 15-23
  • 20 Sadove R C, Powell L A. Simultaneous maxillary and mandibular reconstruction with one free osteocutaneous flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1993;  92 141-146
  • 21 Lyos A T, Evans G RD, Perez D, Schusterman M A. Tongue reconstruction: outcomes with the rectus abdominis flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  103 442-447
  • 22 Salibian A H, Allison G R, Rappaport I, Krugman M E, McMicken B L, Etchepare T L. Total and subtotal glossectomy: function after microvascular reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1990;  85 513-524
  • 23 Rodriquez R, Perry C, Soo K C, Shaw H J. Total glossectomy.  Am J Surg . 1987;  154 415-418
  • 24 Kiyokawa K, Tai Y, Inoue Y, Yanaga H, Mori K, Nakashima T. Functional reconstruction of swallowing and articulation after total glossectomy without laryngectomy: money pouch-like reconstruction method using rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  104 2015-2020
  • 25 Yousif N J, Dzwierzynski W W, Sanger J R, Matloub H S, Campbell B H. The innervated gracilis musculocutaneous flap for total tongue reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  104 916-921
  • 26 Yoleri L, Mavioglu H. Total tongue reconstruction with free functional gracilis muscle transplantation: a technical note and review of the literature.  Ann Plast Surg . 2000;  45 181-186
    >