Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2003; 17(4): 401-408
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-817713
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Prosthetic Rehabilitation in the Management of Facial Defects

Elliott H. Rose
  • Division of Plastic Surgery, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 April 2004 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Custom-fabricated acrylic prostheses serve a useful purpose in replacement of extensive facial defects in elderly or medically unstable patients who are undesirable candidates for autogenous reconstruction. Modern osseointegrated implant technology and artistic skills of prosthetic specialists have significantly raised the levels of patient acceptability.

KEYWORDS

Facial reconstruction - facial restoration - facial prostheses - ocular prostheses - orbital exenteration - orbital enucleation - osseointegrated implants - custom implants - three-dimensional computer imaging - computer-generated models - acrylic implants - fascia lata slings - nasal restoration - orbital restoration - ear restoration - temporoparietal fascial flaps

REFERENCES

  • 1 Branemark P I, Breine U, Adell R. et al . Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg . 1969;  3 81-100
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Hakansson B, Liden G, Tjellstrom A. et al . Ten years of experience with the Swedish Bone anchored dental system.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl . 1990;  151 1-16
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Albrekstsson T, Jansson T, Lekholm U. Osseointegrated dental implants.  Dent Clin North Am . 1986;  30 151-174
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 McComb H. Osseointegrated titanium implants for the attachment of facial prostheses.  Ann Plast Surg . 1993;  31 225-232
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Tjellstrom A. Osseointegrated systems and their applications in the head and neck.  Adv Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1989;  3 39
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Albrektsson T, Branemark P I, Hansson H A. The interface zone of inorganic implants in vivo; titanium implants in bone.  Ann Biomed Eng . 1983;  11 1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Marques A, Brenda E, Magria J, Kowalski L P, Andrews J M. Critical analysis of methods of reconstruction of exenterated orbits.  Br J Plast Surg . 1992;  45 523-528
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Shagets F IW, Panje W R, Shore S W. Use of temporalis muscle flaps in complicated defects of the head and face.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1986;  112 60-65
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Andres C J, Newton A D, Schreiner D E, Shore J W. Orbital prosthesis following temporal muscle forehead flap reconstruction; use of optics and illusions.  J Prosthet Dent . 1992;  67 390-393
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Callahan M A, Callahan A. Ophthalmic Plastic and Orbital Surgery.  Birmingham, AL: Aesculapius; 1979
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Asato H, Harii K, Yamada A, Ueda K. Eye socket reconstruction with free flap transfers.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1993;  92 1061-1067
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Coleman J J. Osseous reconstruction of the midface and orbits.  Clin Plast Surg . 1994;  21 113-124
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Soutar D S, Scheker L R, Tanner N SB, McGregor I A. The radial forearm flap: a versatile method for intraoral reconstruction.  Br J Plast Surg . 1983;  36 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Tse D T, McCafferty L R. Controlled tissue expansion in periocular reconstructive surgery.  Ophthalmology . 1993;  100 260-268
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Rose E H, Norris M S. The versatile temporoparietal fascial flap: adaptability to a variety of composite defects.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1990;  85 224-232
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Rose E H, Norris M S, Rosen J M. Application of high-tech three-dimensional imaging and computer generated models in complex facial reconstruction with vascularized bone grafts.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1993;  91 252-264
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Toth B A, Ellis D S, Stewart W B. Computer-designed prosthesis for orbitocranial reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1988;  81 315-324
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Rose E H. Periorbital restoration. In: Rose EH Aesthetic Facial Restoration. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 1998: 233-235
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Vistnes L M, Iverson R E, Laub D R. The anophthalmic orbit: surgical correction of lower lid ptosis.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1973;  52 346-351
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Paris G L, Spohn W G. Correction of enophthalmos in the anophthalmic orbit.  Ophthalmology . 1980;  87 1301-1308
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Rose E H. Periorbital restoration. In: Rose EH Aesthetic Facial Restoration. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 1998: 236-239
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Brown K E. Fabrication of an ocular prosthesis.  J Prosthet Dent . 1987;  58 351
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Udagama A A. A urethane-lined silicone facial prosthesis.  J Prosthet Dent . 1989;  58 351
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 McComb H. Osseointegrated titanium implants for the attachment of facial prostheses.  Ann Plast Surg . 1993;  31 225-232
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar