Ethical Issues in Critical Care and Cardiac Arrest: Clinical Research, Brain Death, and Organ Donation

ABSTRACT

Cardiac arrest results in global hypoxic-ischemic brain injury from which there is a range of possible neurological outcomes. In most cases, patients may require a surrogate to make decisions regarding end-of-life care, including the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies. This article reviews ethical considerations that arise in the clinical care of patients following cardiac arrest, including decisions to continue or withdraw life-sustaining therapies; brain death determination; and organ donation in the context of brain death and cardiac death (so-called non-heart-beating donation). This article also discusses ethical concerns pertaining to the design and conduct of resuscitation research that is necessary for the development of effective therapies to prevent anoxic brain injury or promote neurological recovery.

KEYWORDS

Cardiac arrest - brain death - organ donation - clinical research - informed consent

REFERENCES

• 1 Diem S J, Lantos J D, Tulsky J A. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television: miracles and misinformation.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  334 1578-1582
• 2 Casarett D, Fishman J M, MacMoran H J, Pickard A, Asch D A. Epidemiology and prognosis of coma in daytime television dramas.  BMJ. 2005;  331 1537-1539
• 3 Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial I Study Group . Randomized clinical study of thiopental loading in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest.  N Engl J Med. 1986;  314 397-403
• 4 Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial II Study Group . A randomized clinical study of a calcium-entry blocker (lidoflazine) in the treatment of comatose survivors of cardiac arrest.  N Engl J Med. 1991;  324 1225-1231
• 5 Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group . Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest.  N Engl J Med. 2002;  346 549-556
• 6 Jastremski M, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Vaagenes P et al.. Glucocorticoid treatment does not improve neurological recovery following cardiac arrest.  JAMA. 1989;  262 3427-3430
• 7 Roine R O, Kaste M, Kinnunen A et al.. Nimodipine after resuscitation from out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial.  JAMA. 1990;  264 3171-3177
• 8 Thel M C, Armstrong A L, McNulty S E et al.. Randomised trial of magnesium in in-hospital cardiac arrest.  Lancet. 1997;  350 1272-1276
• 9 Longstreth Jr W T, Copass M K, Dennis L K et al.. Intravenous glucose after out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: a community-based randomized trial.  Neurology. 1993;  43 2534-2541
• 10 Longstreth Jr W T, Fahrenbruch C E, Olsufka M et al.. Randomized clinical trial of magnesium, diazepam, or both after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.  Neurology. 2002;  59 506-514
• 11 Herlitz J, Andersson E, Bang A et al.. Experiences from treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during 17 years in Goteborg.  Eur Heart J. 2000;  21 1251-1258
• 12 Pusswald G, Fertl E, Faltl M et al.. Neurological rehabilitation of severely disabled cardiac arrest survivors: Part II. Life situation of patients and families after treatment.  Resuscitation. 2000;  47 241-248
• 13 The Pew Research Center .Strong Public Support for Right to Die: More Americans Discussing-and Planning-End-of-Life Treatment [Internet]. Washington, DC; The Pew Research Center 2006 Available at: http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/266.pdf Accessed March 11, 2006
• 14 Larriviere D, Bonnie R J. Terminating artificial nutrition and hydration in persistent vegetative state patients: current and proposed state laws.  Neurology. 2006;  66 1624-1628
• 15 The American Academy of Neurology Code of Professional Conduct.  Neurology. 1993;  43 1257-1260
• 16 Field MJ, Cassel CK Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. Washington, DC; National Academy Press 1997
• 17 Curtis JR, Rubenfeld GD Managing Death in the ICU: The Transition from Cure to Comfort. New York; Oxford University Press 2001
• 18 Geocadin R G, Buitrago M, Torbey M T et al.. Neurological prognosis and withdrawal of life support after resuscitation from cardiac arrest.  Neurology. 2006;  67 105-108
• 19 The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network .Deceased Donors Recovered in the U.S. by Cause of Death. Available at: http://www.optn.org/latestData/viewDataReports.asp Accessed April 27, 2006
• 20 The American Academy of Neurology .Practice Parameter? Determining Brain Death in Adults. Available at: http://www.aan.com/professionals/practice/guideline/index.cfm Accessed March 25, 2006
• 21 Wijdicks E FM. Determining brain death in adults.  Neurology. 1995;  45 1003-1011
• 22 Chase C M, Williams M A. Brain death and organ donation. In: Bhardwaj A, Mirski MA, Ulatowski JA Current Clinical Neurology: Handbook of Neurocritical Care. Totowa, NJ; Humana Press 2005: 311-324
• 23 American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Brain Death in Children . Report of the Special Task Force: guidelines for the determination of brain death in children.  Pediatrics. 1987;  80 298-300
• 24 Wijdicks E FM. The diagnosis of brain death.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  344 1215-1221
• 25 American EEG Society . Guidelines in EEG and evoked potentials.  J Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;  11 1-143
• 26 US Department of Health and Human Services .Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule [Internet]. Washington, DC; US Department of Health and Human Services 2003 Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacysummary.pdf Accessed March 25, 2006
• 27 Childress JF, Liverman CT Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action. Washington, DC; National Academy Press 2006
• 28 The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network .OPTN/SRTR Annual Report-Chapter II: Organ Donation and Utilization. Available at: http://www.optn.org/AR2005/Chapter_II_AR_CD.htm?cp=3 Accessed March 25, 2006
• 29 Herdman R, Potts J T. Non-Heart-Beating Organ Transplantation: Medical and Ethical Issues in Procurement. Washington, DC; National Academy Press 1997
• 30 Committee on Non-Heart-Beating Transplantation II .The Scientific and Ethical Basis for Practice and Protocols. Non-Heart-Beating Organ Transplantation: Practice and Protocols. Washington, DC; National Academy Press 2000
• 31 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services .Collaborative Home. Available at: http://www.organdonationnow.org/ Accessed April 27, 2006
• 32 American College of Critical Care Medicine . Ethics Committee: recommendations for nonheartbeating organ donation.  Crit Care Med. 2001;  29 1826-1831
• 33 Bernat J L, D'Alessandro A M, Port F K et al.. Report of a National Conference on Donation after Cardiac Death.  Am J Transplant. 2006;  6 281-291
• 34 D'Alessandro A M, Fernandez L A, Chin L T et al.. Donation after cardiac death: the University of Wisconsin experience.  Ann Transplant. 2004;  9 68-71
• 35 Morgenweck C J. Innovation to research: some transitional obstacles in critical care units.  Crit Care Med. 2003;  31 S172-S177
• 36 National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research . The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Available at: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html Accessed May 10, 2006
• 37 World Medical Association .Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Available at: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm Accessed May 10, 2006
• 38 Bigatello L M, George E, Hurford W. Ethical considerations for research in critically ill patients.  Crit Care Med. 2003;  31 S178-S181
• 39 Luce J M. Research ethics and consent in the intensive care unit.  Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;  9 540-544
• 40 Schweickert W, Hall J. Informed consent in the intensive care unit: ensuring understanding in a complex environment.  Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005;  11 624-628
• 41 Luce J M. Is the concept of informed consent applicable to clinical research involving critically ill patients?.  Crit Care Med. 2003;  31 S153-S156
• 42 Chen D T, Miller F G, Rosenstein D L. Clinical research and the physician-patient relationship.  Ann Intern Med. 2003;  138 669-672
• 43 Karlawish J H. Research involving cognitively impaired adults.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  348 1389-1392
• 44 Coppolino M, Ackerson L. Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research?.  Chest. 2001;  119 603-612
• 45 Beauchamp T L, Childress J F. Principles of Medical Ethics. 4th ed. New York; Oxford University Press 1994: 120-188
• 46 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services .Informed Consent Requirements in Emergency Research. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/hsdc97-01.htm Accessed May 10, 2006
• 47 Baren J M, Nathanson P G. Recruitment and communication process of participation in the 2005 AEM consensus conference on the ethical conduct of resuscitation research: methodology, challenges, lessons learned.  Acad Emerg Med. 2005;  12 1027-1030
• 48 Hiller K M, Haukoos J S, Heard K, Tashkin J S, Paradis N A. Impact of the final rule on the rate of clinical cardiac arrest research in the United States.  Acad Emerg Med. 2005;  12 1091-1098
• 49 Delorio N M, McClure K B. Does the emergency exception from informed consent process protect research subjects?.  Acad Emerg Med. 2005;  12 1056-1059