References and Notes
1
Balalaie S.
Kowsari E.
Monatsh. Chem.
2001,
132:
1551
2a
Balasubramanian M.
Keay JG. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II
Vol. 5:
Katritzky AR.
Rees CW.
Scriven EFV.
Pergamon Press;
Oxford / New York:
1996.
p.245
2b
Michael JP.
Nat. Prod. Rep.
1997,
14:
605
3a
Aggarwal AK.
Jenekhe SA.
Macromolecules
1991,
24:
6806
3b
Zhang X.
Shetty AS.
Jenekhe SA.
Macromolecules
1999,
32:
7422
3c
Jenekhe SA.
Lu L.
Alam MM.
Macromolecules
2001,
34:
7315
3d
Aoki S.
Sakurama K.
Matsuo N.
Yamada Y.
Takasawa R.
Tanuma S.
Shiro M.
Takeda K.
Kimura E.
Chem. Eur. J.
2006,
12:
9066
3e
Qu S.
Lin Z.
Duan C.
Zhang H.
Bai Z.
Chem. Commun.
2006,
4392
3f
Shavaleev NM.
Adams H.
Best J.
Edge R.
Navaratnam S.
Weinstein JA.
Inorg. Chem.
2006,
45:
9410
For recent reports on the synthesis of quinoline derivatives, see:
4a
Duvelleroy D.
Perrio C.
Parisel O.
Lasne M.-C.
Org. Biomol. Chem.
2005,
3:
3794
4b
Kouznetsov VV.
Méndez LYV.
Gómez CMM.
Curr. Org. Chem.
2005,
9:
141
4c
Familoni OB.
Klaas PJ.
Lobb KA.
Pakade VE.
Kaye PT.
Org. Biomol. Chem.
2006,
4:
3960
4d
Wu J.
Xia H.
Gao K.
Org. Biomol. Chem.
2006,
4:
126
4e
Tanaka S.
Yasuda M.
Baba A.
J. Org. Chem.
2006,
71:
800
4f
Wu Y.
Liu L.
Li H.
Wang D.
Chen Y.
J. Org. Chem.
2006,
71:
6592
4g
Korivi RP.
Cheng C.
J. Org. Chem.
2006,
71:
7079
4h
Sakai N.
Annaka K.
Konakahara T.
J. Org. Chem.
2006,
71:
3653
4i
Asao N.
Iso K.
Yudha SS.
Org. Lett.
2006,
8:
4149
4j
Sromek AW.
Rheingold AL.
Wink DJ.
Gevorgyan V.
Synlett
2006,
2325
4k
Abbiati G.
Arcadi A.
Marinelli F.
Rossi E.
Verdecchia M.
Synlett
2006,
3218
4l
Muscia GC.
Bollini M.
Carnevale JP.
Bruno AM.
Asis SE.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2006,
47:
8811
4m
Cho CS.
Ren WX.
Shim SC.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2006,
47:
6781
4n
Lin X.-F.
Cui S.-L.
Wang Y.-G.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2006,
47:
3127
4o
Wang G.-W.
Jia C.-S.
Dong Y.-W.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2006,
47:
1059
4p
Li A.
Ahmed E.
Chen X.
Cox M.
Crew AP.
Dong H.
Jin M.
Ma L.
Panicker B.
Siu KW.
Steinig AG.
Stolz KM.
Tavares PAR.
Volk B.
Weng Q.
Werner D.
Mulvihill MJ.
Org. Biomol. Chem.
2007,
5:
61
4q
Arcadi A.
Bianchi G.
Inesi A.
Marinelli F.
Rossi L.
Synlett
2007,
103
There are a few reports for the synthesis of 2-aryl-3-carboalkoxy quinoline using Friedländer reaction. For examples, see:
5a
Patteux C.
Levacher V.
Dupas G.
Org. Lett.
2003,
5:
3061
5b
Leleu S.
Papamicaël C.
Marsais F.
Dupas G.
Levacher V.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2004,
15:
3919
6 When this reaction was carried out at reflux in toluene, the major product was the 1,4-dihydropyridines. The investiga-tion regarding the synthesis of 1,4-dihydropyridines will be reported elsewhere in due course.
7 We performed this reaction using TfOH (10 mol%) at reflux in EtOH, and obtained the quinoline 4aa in 50% yield.
8
General Procedure: To the EtOH (5 mL) solution of 1a (53.9 mg, 0.5 mmol), 2a (55 µL, 0.54 mmol) and Lewis acid (0.05 mmol, 10 mol%) was added 3 (61 µL, 0.6 mmol) using a microsyringe and then the mixture was refluxed for 24 h. The reaction was quenched with sat. aq NaHCO3 and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4. The organic layer was filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The yield of 4aa was determined by GC using biphenyl as the internal standard. The quinoline 4aa was purified by preparative TLC (SiO2; hexane-EtOAc, 7:1) and/or recycling preparative HPLC (GPC column, CHCl3 as an eluent) and was fully characterized.
Ethyl 6-Methyl-2-phenylquinoline-3-carboxylate (4aa): 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.06 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 2.55 (s, 3 H), 4.17 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.44 (m, 3 H), 7.62 (m, 4 H), 8.07 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.55 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ = 13.6, 21.5, 61.4, 125.4, 125.8, 126.8, 128.1, 128.3, 128.4, 129.1, 133.8, 137.2, 138.3, 140.8, 146.9, 157.2, 168.1.
9 The reaction with imine 5, which was prepared from 1a and 2a, using Sc(OTf)3 yielded the quinoline 4aa in 60% yield.
10 CCDC 650434 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compound 4ha. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12, Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44(1223)336033.
11
Typical Procedure (Scheme 2): To the EtOH (7 mL) solution of 1a (107.2 mg, 1.0 mmol), 2d (110 µL, 1.1 mmol), which was distilled from P2O5 before use, and Sc(OTf)3 (49.2 mg, 0.10 mmol) was added 3 (122 µL, 1.2 mmol) using a microsyringe and then the mixture was refluxed for 24 h. The reaction was quenched with sat. aq NaHCO3 and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4. This organic layer was filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by short column chromatography (hexane-EtOAc, 6:1) and recycling preparative HPLC (GPC column, CHCl3 as an eluent) to give the pure 4ad in 34% yield.
Diethyl 6-Methylquinoline-2,3-dicarboxylate (4ad): 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.45 (m, 6 H), 2.57 (s, 3 H), 4.43 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 4.52 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.67 (m, 2 H), 8.09 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 1 H), 8.67 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ = 14.1, 21.6, 61.4, 62.2, 122.5, 127.1, 127.3, 129.4, 134.6, 138.7, 138.9, 146.6, 147.0, 165.3, 166.9.
12 The CuOTf-catalyzed 1,4-addition of EtOH to ethyl propiolate has been reported. See: Bertz SH.
Dabbagh G.
Cotte P.
J. Org. Chem.
1982,
47:
2216
13a
Makioka Y.
Shindo T.
Taniguchi Y.
Takaki K.
Fujiwara Y.
Synthesis
1995,
801
13b
Kobayashi S.
Ishitani H.
Nagayama S.
Synthesis
1995,
1195
14 In this reaction, ethyl 3,3-diethoxypropionate was obtained predominantly.