Maintained effectiveness of an electronic alert system to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients

Summary

Despite current guidelines, venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is underused. Computerized programs to encourage physicians to apply thromboprophylaxis have been shown to be effective in selected populations. Our aim was to analyze the impact of the implementation of a computer- alert system for VTE risk in all hospitalized patients of a teaching hospital. A computer program linked to the clinical record database was developed to assess all hospitalized patients’VTE risk daily. The physician responsible for patients at high risk was alerted, but remained free to order or withhold prophylaxis. Over 19,000 hospitalized, medical and surgical, adult patients between January to June 2005 (pre-intervention phase), January to June 2006 and January to June 2007 (postintervention phase), were included. During the first semesters of 2006 and 2007, an electronic alert was sent to 32.8% and 32.2% of all hospitalized patients, respectively. Appropriate prophylaxis among alerted patients was ordered in 89.7% (2006) and 88.5% (2007) of surgical patients, and in 49.2% (2006) and 64.4% (2007) of medical patients. A sustained reduction of VTE during hospitalization was achieved, Odds ratio (OR): 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.25–1.10) and OR: 0.51, 95%CI (0.24–1.05) during the first semesters of 2006 and 2007 respectively, the impact being significant (p<0.05) among medical patients in 2007, OR: 0.36, 95%CI (0.12–0.98). The implementation of a computer- alert program helps physicians to assess each patient’s thrombotic risk, leading to a better use of thromboprophylaxis, and a reduction in the incidence of VTE among hospitalized patients. For the first time, an intervention aimed to improveVTE prophylaxis shows maintained effectiveness over time.

Keywords

Electronic alert - hospitalized patients - prophylaxis - venous thromboembolism

• References

• 1 Cohen AT, Agnelli G, Anderson FA. et al. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost 2007; 98: 756-764.
• 2 Anderson FA, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ. et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: the Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 933-938.
• 3 Dunn AS, Brenner A, Halm EA. The magnitude of an iatrogenic disorder: a systematic review of the incidenceofvenous thromboembolism for general medical inpatients. Thromb Haemost 2006; 95: 758-762.
• 4 Baglin TP, White K, Charles A. Fatal pulmonary embolism in hospitalized medical patients. J Clin Pathol 1997; 50: 609-610.
• 5 Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN. et al. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 809-815.
• 6 Dentali F, Douketis JD, Gianni M. et al. Metaanalysis: anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 278-288.
• 7 Wein L, Wein S, Haas SJ. et al. Pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients. A meta-analysis of ramdomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1476-1486.
• 8 Cayley WE. Preventing deep vein thrombosis in hospital inpatients. Br Med J 2007; 335: 147-151.
• 9 Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA. et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126 (Suppl. 03) 338S-400S.
• 10 Ageno W, Squizzato A, Ambrosini F. et al. Thrombosis prophylaxis in medical patients: a retrospective review of clinical practice patterns. Haematologica 2002; 87: 746-750.
• 11 Goldhaber SZ, Tapson VF. for the DVT FREE Steering Committee. A prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 259-262.
• 12 Tapson VF, Decousus H, Pini M. et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutelly ill hospitalized medical patients: findings from the international medical prevention registry on venous thromboembolism. Chest 2007; 132: 936-945.
• 13 Amin A, Stemkovwski S, Lin J. et al. Thromboprophylaxis rates in US medical centers: success or failure?. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 05: 1610-1616.
• 14 Seddighzadeh A, Zurawska U, Shetty R. et al. Venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing surgery: low rates of prophylaxis and high rates of filter insertion. Thromb Haemost 2007; 98: 1220-1225.
• 15 Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF. et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet 2008; 371: 387-384.
• 16 Chopard P, Dörffler-Melly J, Hess U. et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutelly ill medical patients: definite need for improvement. J Intern Med 2005; 257: 352-357.
• 17 Goldhaber SZ. Preventing pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis: a ‘call to action’ for vascular medicine specialists. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 05: 1607-1609.
• 18 Scaglione L, Piobbici M, Pagano E. et al. Implementing guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in a large Italian teaching hospital: lights and shadows. Haematologica 2005; 90: 678-684.
• 19 Tooher R, Middleton P, Pham C. et al. A systematic review of strategies to improve prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospitals. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 397-415.
• 20 Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R. et al. Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 967-977.
• 21 Alonso C, Medrano FJ, Romero A. et al. Guía PRETEMED 2003. Guía de profilaxis de enfermedad tromboembólica en patología médica. SADEMI, Córdoba; 2003
• 22 Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Clasificación internacional de Enfermedades, 9^a revisión, Modificación Clínica. 5a ed. Madrid, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo; 2006
• 23 Anderson FA, Zayaruzny M, Heit JA. et al. Estimated annual numbers of US acute-care hospital patients at risk for venous thromboembolism. Am J Hematol 2007; 82: 777-782.
• 24 Monreal M, Kakkar AK, Caprini JA. et al. The outcome after treatment of venous thromboembolism is different in surgical and acutely ill medical patients. Findings from the RIETE registry. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 02: 1892-1898.
• 25 Samama MM, Dahl OE, Mismetti P. et al. An electronic tool for venous thromboembolism prevention in medical and surgical patients. Haematologica 2006; 91: 64-70.
• 26 Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM. et al. A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 965-970.
• 27 Mosen D, Elliot CG, Egger MJ. et al. The effect of a computerized reminder system on the prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism. Chest 2004; 125: 1635-1641.
• 28 Baroletti S, Munz K, Sonis J. et al. Electronic alerts for hospitalized high-VTE risk patients not receiving prophylaxis: a cohort study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2008; 25: 146-150.
• 29 Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 157: 408-416.
• 30 Spencer FA, Lessard D, Emery C. et al. Venous thromboembolism in the outpatient setting. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1471-1475.
• 31 Goldhaber SZ. Outpatient venous thromboembolism: the importance of optimum prophylaxis. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008; 05: 12-13.
• 32 Hull RD, Schellong SM, Tapson VF. et al. Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis in acutelly ill medical patients with recent reduced mobility: methodology for the EXCLAIM study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2006; 22: 31-38.