Complication rate, outcome, and risk factors associated with surgical repair of fractures of the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle in dogs

Summary

Objective: To determine outcome, report complications, and risk factors for complications associated with the surgical treatment of fractures of the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle (FLHC) in dogs. Study design: Fifty dogs with FLHC that had been repaired surgically were included in this retrospective case series. Methods: The medical records and radiographs from 50 dogs with FLHC from 1990–2006 were analyzed. Results: The complication rate was 30%. For every 30-minute increase in surgical time the odds of a complication increased by 2.00 (95% CI: 1.06, 3.77). For every 10° increase in the angle between the transcondylar screw and a line between the epicondyles viewed on a craniocaudal radiograph there was a 4.82 (95% CI: 1.23, 18.86) greater odds of an intracondylar fracture gap appearing on postoperative radiographs. When an intracondylar fracture gap was present after surgery there was a 25% long-term radiographic outcome failure rate, whereas there was a 0% radiographic failure rate in the dogs in which an intracondylar fracture gap was not present. In conclusion, transcondylar screw placement parallel to the epicondylar line should be attempted for the repair of FLHC. An increase in surgical time leads to an increase in postoperative complication rate. The presence of an intracondylar fracture gap may be associated with fracture failure. Clinical significance: Screw angulation predisposed to postoperative intracondylar fracture gap which in turn may be associated with higher fracture fixation failure rate. The dogs that had prolonged surgical times had an increased complication rate.

Keywords

Humerus - fractures - dogs - lateral - angulation

• References

• 1 Phillips IR. A survey of bone fractures in the dog and cat. J Small Anim Pract 1979; 20: 661-673.
• 2 Vannini R, Olmstead ML, Smeak DD. An Epidemiological study of 151 distal humeral fractures in dogs andcats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1988; 24: 531-536.
• 3 Denny JR. Condylar fractures of the humerus in the dog: a review of 133 cases. J Small Animal Pract 1983; 24: 185-197.
• 4 Evans HE. Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog.. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB. Saunders Company; 1993. .
• 5 Bojrab MJ. Disease Mechanisms in Small Animal Surgery. (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1993. .
• 6 Vannini R, Smeak DD, Olmstead ML. Evaluation of surgical repair of 135 distal humeral fractures in dogs andcats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1988; 24: 537-545.
• 7 Rorvik AM. Risk factors for humeral condylar fractures in the dog: a retrospective study. J Small Anim Pract 1993; 34: 277-282.
• 8 Vannini R, Olmstead ML, Smeak DD. Humeral condylar fractures caused by minor trauma in 20 adult dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1988; 24: 355-362.
• 9 Kaderly RE, Lamothe M. Incomplete humeral condylar fracture due to minor trauma in amature cocker spaniel. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1992; 28: 361-364.
• 10 Marcellin-Little DJ, DeYoung DJ, Ferris KK. et al. Incomplete Ossification of the humeral condyle in spaniels. Vet Surg 1994; 23: 475-487.
• 11 Meyer-Lindenberg A, Heinen V, Fehr M. et al. Incomplete ossification of the humeral condyle as the cause of lameness in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2002; 15: 187-194.
• 12 Sumner-Smith G. Variation in ages of growth plate fusioninthedog. J Small Anim Pract 1966; 7: 303-311.
• 13 Matthiessen DT, Walter M. Surgical management of distal humeral fractures Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet. 1984; 6: 1027-1036.
• 14 Cook JL, Tomlinson JL, Reed AL. Fluoroscopically guided closed reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the lateral portion of the humeral condyle: prospective clinical study of the technique and results in ten dogs. Vet Surg 1999; 28: 315-321.
• 15 Herron MR. Lateral condylar fractures of the humerus: amethod of closedrepair. Canine Pract 1975; Jan-Feb: 30-34.
• 16 Sumner-Smith G. Fixing intercondylar fractures of the humerus of the dog. Vet Rec 1962; 74: 293.
• 17 Guille AE, Lewis DD, Anderson TP. et al. Evaluation of surgical repair of humeral condylar fractures using self-compressing Orthofix pins in 23 dogs. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 314-322.
• 18 Daubs BM, McLaughlin RM, Silverman E. et al. Evaluation of compression generated by self compressing Orthofix bone pins and lag screws in simulated lateral humeral condylar fractures. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 175-179.
• 19 Vida JT, Pooya H, Vasseur PB. et al. Biomechanical comparison of Orthofix pins and cortical bone screws in a canine humeral condylar fracture model. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 491-498.
• 20 Lanz OI, Lewis DD, Newell SM. Stabilization of a physeal fracture using an Orthofix partially-threaded kirschner wire. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12: 88-91.
• 21 Cockett PA, Clayton Jones DG. The repair of humeral condylar fractures in the dog: a review of seventynine cases. J Small Anim Pract 1985; 26: 493-520.
• 22 Morshead D, Stambaugh JE. Kirschner wire fixation of lateral humeral condylar fractures in small dogs. Vet Surg 1984; 13: 1-5.
• 23 Bardet JF, Hohn RB, Rudy RL. et al. Fractures of the humerus in dogs and cats: A retrospective study of 130 cases. Vet Surg 1983; 12: 73-77.
• 24 Gordon WJ, Besançon MF, Conzemius MG. et al. Frequency of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in dogs after repair of a humeral condylar fracture. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 1-5.
• 25 Brown DC, Conzemius MG, Shofer F. et al. Epidemiologic evaluation of postoperative wound infections in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 210: 1302-1306.
• 26 Cruse P, Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A10 year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am 1980; 60: 27-40.
• 27 Haley RW, Culver DH, Morgan WH. et al. Identifying patients at high risk of surgical wound infection. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121: 206-215.