Outcome and complications after dual mobility total hip replacement

P. Guillaumot; A. Autefage; T. Dembour; J.-L. Chancrin

doi:10.3415/VCOT-11-08-0116

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25(06): 511-517
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-11-08-0116

Clinical Communication

Schattauer GmbH

Outcome and complications after dual mobility total hip replacement

Fifty cases with a minimum of six months clinical and radiographic follow-up

P. Guillaumot

¹Clinique vétérinaire Olliolis, Ollioules, France

,

A. Autefage

²Service de chirurgie, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, France

,

T. Dembour

¹Clinique vétérinaire Olliolis, Ollioules, France

,

J.-L. Chancrin

¹Clinique vétérinaire Olliolis, Ollioules, France

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Objectives: To report the clinical and radiographic outcome of a canine total hip prosthesis with a dual mobility acetabular component, with a minimum of six months follow-up.

Methods: The outcome of dogs that underwent primary cemented unilateral dual mobility hip prosthesis surgery by one of the authors for hip dysplasia or trauma, and which had a minimum of six months clinical and radiologic follow-up, was evaluated.

Results: Fifty dogs were included in the study. Follow-up ranged from six to 38 months (mean 14.4 months). Perioperative complications were acetabular collapse (n = 1) and greater trochanter fracture (n = 1), both of which were successfully managed perioperatively. Postoperative complications were aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (n = 2; both surgically revised), implant sepsis (n = 3; all explanted), acetabular fracture (n = 1; conservatively managed), greater trochanter fracture (n = 1; conservatively managed) and sciatic neurapraxia (n = 1). No cases of postoperative luxation or femoral implant aseptic loosening were encountered. Outcome was poor for three cases (3 implant sepsis), fair for three cases (including 1 acetabular component loosening and 1 acetabular fracture), and good or excellent for 44 cases (88%).

Clinical significance: There were not any cases of postoperative coxofemoral luxation observed in this series of 50 dogs with dual mobility hip prosthesis. Studies with more patients and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the satisfactory results observed to date with this implant.

Keywords

Hip - prosthesis - replacement - arthroplasty - dual mobility

Full Text

References

References
1 Conzemius MG, Vandervoort J. Total joint replacement in the dog. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2005; 35: 1213-1231.
2 Cross AR, Newell SM, Chambers JN. et al. Acetabular component orientation as an indicator of implant luxation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 517-523.
3 Dyce J, Wisner ER, Wang Q. et al. Evaluation of risk factors for luxation after total hip replacement in dogs. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 524-532.
4 Nelson LL, Dyce J, Shott S. Risk factors for ventral luxation in canine total hip replacement. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 644-653.
5 Hayes GM, Ramirez J, Langley Hobbs SJ. Does the degree of preoperative subluxation or soft tissue tension affect the incidence of postoperative luxation in dogs after total hip replacement?. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 6-13.
6 Edwards MR, Egger EL, Schwarz PD. Aseptic loosening of the femoral implant after cemented total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 11 cases in 10 dogs (1991-1995). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 211: 580-586.
7 Hunter S, Dyce J, Buktus L. et al. Acetabular cup displacement after polyethylene cement interface failure: A complication of total hip replacement in seven dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 99-104.
8 Ota J, Cook JL, Lewis DD. et al. Short-term aseptic loosening of the femoral component in canine total hip replacement: effects of cementing technique on cement mantle grade. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 345-352.
9 Skurla CP, James SP. Assessing the dog as a model for human total hip replacement: analysis of 38 postmortem-retrieved canine cemented acetabular components. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 73: 260-270.
10 Skurla CP, Pluhar GE, Frankel DJ. et al. Assessing the dog as a model for human total hip replacement: analysis of 38 canine cemented femoral components retrieved at post-mortem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87-B: 120-127.
11 Palmisano MP, Dyce J, Olmstead ML. Extraosseous cement granuloma associated with total hip replacement in 6 dogs. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 80-90.
12 Dyce J, Olmstead ML. Removal of infected canine cemented total hip prostheses using a femoral window technique. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 552-560.
13 Liska WD. Femur fractures associated with canine total hip replacement. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 164-172.
14 Yates GD, Wasik SM, Edwards GA. Femoral component failure in canine cemented total hip replacement: a report of two cases. Aust Vet J 2010; 88: 225-230.
15 Andrews CM, Liska WD, Roberts DJ. Sciatic neurapraxia as a complication in 1000 consecutive canine total hip replacements. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 254-262.
16 Liska WD, Poteet BA. Pulmonary embolism associated with canine total hip replacement. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 178-186.
17 Sebestyen P, Marcellin-Little DJ, DeYoung BA. Femoral medullary infarction secondary to canine total hip arthroplasty. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 227-236.
18 Marcellin-Little DJ, DeYoung DJ, Thrall DE. et al. Osteosarcoma at the site of bone infarction associated with total hip arthroplasty in a dog. Vet Surg 1999; 28: 54-60.
19 Sarrau S. Comparaison biomécanique, in vitro de deux tiges fémorales de prothèse totale de hanche chez le chien [In vitro biochemical comparison of two total hip prostheses femoral stems in dogs]. Veterinary degree. Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse: 2004
20 Chancrin JL, Dembour T, Autefage A. et al. La prothèse de hanche Amplitude scellée à double mobilité: principe, conception, premiers résultats. À propos de 24 cas [Dual mobility Amplitude total hip prosthesis: principle, conception, first results. About 24 cases]. Prat Med Chir Anim Comp 2009; 44: 83-92.
21 Guillaumot P, Autefage A, Palierne S. et al. Dual mobility canine total hip prosthesis: implant characteristics and surgical procedure. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 506-510.
22 Olmstead ML, Hohn RB, Turner TM. A five-year study of 221 total hip replacements in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983; 183: 191-194.
23 Paul HA, Bargar WL. A modified technique for canine total hip replacement. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1987; 23: 13-18.
24 Bardet JF, Matis U. La prothèse totale de hanche cimentée chez le chien : suivi post-opératoire de 100 prothèses Richards [Cemented total hip prosthesis in dog: post-operative follow-up of 100 Richards prostheses]. Prat Med Chir Anim Comp 1990; 25: 457-462.
25 Olmstead ML. The canine cemented modular total hip prosthesis. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1995; 31: 109-124.
26 Bardet JF. Cemented total hip replacement: experience in France with the Porte Prosthesis [Pre-congress Communication]. ESVOT Pre-congress: Total hip replacement seminar. 2004. September 9 Munich, Germany: pg. 14.
27 Bergh MS, Gilley RS, Shofer FS. et al. Complications and radiographic findings following cemented total hip replacement: a retrospective evaluation of 97 dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19: 172-179.
28 Iwata D, Broun HC, Black AP. et al. Total hip arthroplasty outcomes assessment using functional and radiographic scores to compare canine systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 221-230.
29 Guerrero TG, Montavon PM. Zurich cementless total hip replacement: retrospective evaluation of 2nd generation implants in 60 dogs. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 70-80.
30 Hach V, Delfs G. Initial experience with a newly developed cementless hip endoprosthesis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 153-158.
31 Hummel DW, Lanz OI, Werre SR. Complications of cementless total hip replacement. A retrospective study of 163 cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 424-432.
32 Liska WD. Micro total hip replacement for dogs and cats: surgical technique and outcomes. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 797-810.
33 Hayes GM, Ramirez J, Langley Hobbs SJ. Use of the cumulative summation technique to quantitatively assess a surgical learning curve: canine total hip replacement. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 1-5.
34 Massat BJ, Vasseur PB. Clinical and radiographic results of total hip arthroplasty in dogs: 96 cases (1986-1992). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994; 205: 448-454.
35 Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B. et al. The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop 2009; 33: 927-932.
36 Skurla CP, James SP. Postmortem retrieved canine THR: femoral and acetabular component interaction. Biomed Sci Instrum 2004; 40: 255-260.
37 Torres BT, Chambers JN, Budsberg SC. Successful cementless cup reimplantation using cortical bone graft augmentation after an acetabular fracture and cup displacement. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 87-91.
38 Budsberg SC, Chambers JN, Lue SL. et al. Prospective evaluation of ground reaction forces in dogs undergoing unilateral total hip replacement. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 1781-1785.