CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2021; 16(01): 208-211
DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_480_20
Case Report

Primary intraosseous xanthogranuloma in adult cervical spine: A case report of benign cause of lytic bone lesion

Sundus Ali
Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore
,
Adnan Qasim
Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore
,
Muhammad Sarwar
Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore
,
Attah Munam
Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore
,
Shahzad Shams
Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore
› Author Affiliations
 

Lytic lesions in adult spine are a common manifestation of aggressive disease such as primary bone tumor, metastasis, myeloma, or infectious pathology. Xanthoma arising in the spine with purely intraosseous component is an extremely rare occurrence with only six cases reported in the adult population, none in the cervical region. We report the first case of primary xanthoma of the cervical spine in a 50-year-old male solely confined to osseous compartment. The imaging mimics of lytic lesion with expansile mass in adult spine are reiterated.


#

Introduction

Bone xanthoma is a known entity with predilection for the appendicular skeleton, but involvement of the axial skeleton is also well mentioned in the literature.[[1]] The spine is an atypical site for xanthoma and can be divided into osseous, extradural, intradural, and intramedullary types.[[2]],[[3]],[[4]],[[5]],[[6]],[[7]],[[8]] Intraosseous involvement is rare, and only six cases have been reported in the adult population.[[9]],[[10]],[[11]],[[12]],[[13]],[[14]] Here, we report a case of primary xanthoma occurring in the cervical spine in a 50-year-old male, presenting as lytic expansile lesion which was presumed to be aggressive lesion such as mets, myeloma, or tuberculous granuloma. This is the seventh case among adult spinal intraosseous xanthoma. Cervical involvement has been reported in seven cases till date,[[2]],[[3]],[[5]],[[6]],[[7]],[[15]],[[16]] with only one case of intraosseous involvement in the pediatric age group.[[16]] To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of cervical spine involvement as primary intraosseous lesion in the adult age group.


#

Case Report

A 50-year-old male patient was referred to our hospital, with a 4-month history of neck pain and gradually progressive weakness of all four limbs. Over the past 2 weeks, the patient noticed significant deterioration and became bed bound. The patient denies any previous history of trauma, malignancy, or medical history of note. Clinical examination revealed spastic quadriparesis of 3/5 with 80% decreased sensation of all modalities below C5. Sphincters were found to be intact.

Imaging

Plain X-ray cervical spine on anterior-posterior (AP) view showed a large lucent lesion replacing the C5 vertebra with loss of the left pedicle [[Figure 1]]a. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine demonstrated a T1 and T2 isointense, expansile mass lesion involving the C5 vertebral body extending into the left pedicle but sparing neural foramina. On T2, small hyperintense intralesional cavity was noted in the anterior part. The lesion extended across the C5/6 intervertebral disc and into the anteroinferior part of the C4 vertebra. Significant cord compression with absent thecal sac against C5 was noted. The lesion enhanced homogeneously with gadolinium and appeared completely extradural [[Figure 1]]b,[[Figure 1]]c,[[Figure 1]]d. Based on imaging, metastasis, myeloma, and tuberculous granuloma were suspected.{Figure 1}

Zoom Image
Figure 1: (a) Interpedicular and interspinous widening at C5, implementing large expansile lytic lesion replacing C5 vertebral body. Left C5 pedicle absent while right C5 pedicle displaced and thinned out. (b and c) Sagittal cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging showing soft-tissue mass isointense on T1 and T2, replacing C5 body, with T2 hyperintense cavity in the anterior part. (d) Axial section at C5 level, showing homogeneous enhancement of lesion, extension to the left pedicle, and thecal sac compression. Posterior elements are well spared

#

Treatment

The patient underwent standard anterior cervical decompression and fixation. Peroperatively, tumor appeared as a well-encapsulated, firm, multinodular mass, yellow tan in color, 3 cm × 3 cm × 2 cm in size. There was a small necrotic part corresponding to the T2 hyperintensity. The lesion was excised in piecemeal fashion [[Figure 2]]a to completely decompress the cord. No clue of bone was found within the mass. At this point, differential was further narrowed to granulomatous lesion like tuberculosis. Histology revealed sheets of histiocytes with foamy cytoplasm and bland nuclei. Focal cholesterol clefts and multinucleated giant cells were also noticed. There was no cellular atypia. CD68 was positive and S100 was found to be negative [[Figure 2]]b and [[Figure 2]]c.{Figure 2}

Zoom Image
Figure 2: (a) Biopsy specimen as yellow soft-to-firm mass removed piecemeal. (b) Histological findings (hematoxylin and eosin stain): Numerous foamy cells, cholesterol clefts, and multinucleated giant cells. (c) Immunohistochemical findings (streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method): Cells showed strong positivity for CD68

The serum calcium was normal, and lipid profile showed normolipemia. Clinical examination did not reveal any soft-tissue xanthomas. The patient was able to return to his normal activities 4 weeks after the operation. Postoperative imaging as per routine following anterior decompression and fixation consisted of plain X-ray cervical spine AP and lateral views [[Figure 3]]a and [[Figure 3]]b. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) of the same area was planned at the 6-month follow-up both to see the integrity of fixation as well as to rule out the tumor recurrence, but the patient was not able to reach out for imaging because of pandemic restrictions. Currently, he is 1 year out of his surgery, with no reported complaint as per telephonic follow-up.{Figure 3}

Zoom Image
Figure 3: (a) Postoperative X-ray cervical spine, anterior-posterior view. (b) Lateral view, due to very short neck, lower screws are not visible

#
#

Discussion

Abnormal cholesterol deposition within various tissues such as skin, subcutaneous tissue, tendons, and bones constitutes the term “xanthoma.” Bone xanthomas are common and have a predilection for the appendicular skeleton, although skull, ribs, and pelvis are also well mentioned among the axial skeleton.[[17]] Xanthoma arising within the vertebra is a rare occurrence with six cases reported so far in the adult population [[Table 1]].{Table 1}

Zoom Image
Table 1: Summary of the reported cases of intraosseous xanthoma in adult spine

As evident, the term “secondary” means occurring in the setting of endocrine or metabolic diseases with increased cholesterol levels, or a preexisting bony lesion, whereas the term “primary” is reserved for cases with no preexisting lesion as well as normal lipid profile.[[1]] However, it has been reported that bone xanthoma can precede the onset of hyperlipidemia as long as 15 years and can be the first sign of dyslipidemia.[[18]]

The usual reported age of bone xanthoma is after the second decade with male predominance.[[1]] The same demographic distribution has been observed in spinal intraosseous xanthomas reported so far. Regarding systemic associations, hyperlipidemia and cutaneous xanthoma were found in 69% and 53% of patients of bone xanthomas, respectively.[[11]] Among vertebral xanthomas, only two cases have reported hyperlipidemia,[[11]],[[14]] and out of these, only one had documented cutaneous stigmata.[[11]] A case closely resembling to ours in the pediatric age group has been documented.[[16]]

Notably, all reported cases presented as lytic lesion and suspected to be aggressive pathology, and none was predicted on clinical or radiological grounds. The diagnosis was made purely on histological features. On X-ray and/or CT, a large lucent lesion occupying the vertebral body with extension into the pedicles, transgressing the adjacent disc spaces was a consistent finding in all cases. However, in comparison to xanthomas occurring in long bones, no evidence of reactive bone or sclerotic margin was found.[[17]]

So far, no specific MRI features have been demonstrated, making radiological diagnosis ever challenging. The MRI signal depends on the content of lesion. More fibrous spindle cells would give low T2, whereas more foamy cells and cholesterol clefts appear low on fat-saturated sequence.[[19]]

The differential diagnosis of a lytic lesion in adult spine is wide, and common suspects after the fourth decade are myeloma and bone metastases. In Pakistan, tuberculosis is endemic and commonly encountered as lytic lesion with soft-tissue mass, so it was in our top differential. Among the reported cases, one sacral lesion was presumed to be tuberculous granuloma.[[11]]

Myeloma is low on T1 and high on T2. The MRI features of metastasis can be variable, but most of these are low on T1 and mixed to high signal on T2. Although bilateral pedicle involvement is a well-known sign for malignant disease, expansile lesion in contrast to vertebral collapse favors benign pathology.[[20]],[[21]] Cortical disruption and expansion both are documented with bone xanthoma.[[22]] Epidural and paravertebral extension was found in all but one case in the reported literature. Epidural but not paravertebral extension was found in our case.

Although international classification of histiocytic disorders has grouped xanthogranuloma and Langerhans cell histiocytosis together as “dendritic cell-related” histiocytoses, xanthoma is clearly described as non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis and can be differentiated by immunohistochemical stains[[19]] [[Table 2]].{Table 2}

Zoom Image
Table 2: Hallmark features differentiating from similar histological entities

Despite being a benign pathology, treatment depends on the area of bone involved, i.e., anterior or posterior elements and neural compromise. In case of posterior element disease, simple curettage or laminectomy achieves neural decompression, with or without fixation. Anterior disease is dealt anteriorly through corpectomy and graft fixation. More radical approaches such as total spondylectomy are not favored for benign disease in mobile segment of the spine.[[23]] Surgical morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine has been reported to be as high as 35%.[[24]] Subtotal removal is followed by radiotherapy while total removal is considered curative.[[13]],[[16]] Lipid-lowering medical therapy is added as an adjunct in cases of secondary disease. No recurrences have been reported in the literature following appropriate treatment.[[1]]

Our patient was treated with near-total excision of the tumor with C5 corpectomy using standard anterior approach with bone grafting and plate fixation. Postoperatively, the patient had a significant improvement in spasticity and power in all four limbs.

To the best of our knowledge, our case is the first case in the adult age group affecting the cervical spine. Considering both children and adults, this is the second case to be reported in the cervical spine as intraosseous lesion. Intraosseous xanthoma should be added to the differential diagnosis of lytic bone lesion in adult spine.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.


#
#
#

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.


  • References

  • 1 Alhaneedi G, Salameh M, Abu Hejleh H. Xanthoma of bone: A mini review. Arch Surg Oncol 2018;4:130. [Doi: 10.4172/2471-2671.1000130].
  • 2 Cao D, Ma J, Yang X, Xiao J. Solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma in the upper cervical spine: Case report and review of the literatures. Eur Spine J 2008;17:S318-23.
  • 3 Lee SJ, Jo DJ, Lee SH, Kim SM. Solitary xanthogranuloma of the upper cervical spine in a male adult. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012;51:54-8.
  • 4 Purohit D, Chanduka AK, Sharma V, Mittal RS, Singhvi S. Juvenile xanthogranuloma of adult spine: A rare case and review of literature. Asian J Neurosurg 2014;9:239.
  • 5 Oyama H, Ikeda K, Inoue S, Katsumata T, Murakami S, Doi A. A case of intradural xanthogranuloma in the upper cervical spine. Neurol Surg 1997;25:745-8.
  • 6 Inoue H, Seichi A, Yamamuro K, Kojima M, Kimura A, Hoshino Y. Dumbbell-type juvenile xanthogranuloma in the cervical spine of an adult. Eur Spine J 2011;20:S343-7.
  • 7 Konar S, Pandey P, Yasha TC. Solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma in cervical spine: Case report and review of the literature. Turk Neurosurg 2014;24:102-7.
  • 8 Pirillo V, Prontera A, Rizzo P, Cecchi PC, Maffei M, Schwarz A. A rare case of intramedullary solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma of the lumbar spine in the adult: A case report. J Spine Surg 2017;3:504-8.
  • 9 Robertson DP, Langford LA, McCutcheon IE. Primary xanthoma of thoracic spine presenting with myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1933-7.
  • 10 Chung JY, Moon ES, Song EK, Yoon TR, Jung ST, Bae BS, et al. Primary xanthoma of the lumbosacral spine a case report. J Musculoskelet Res 1999;3:167-73.
  • 11 Huang GS, Huang CW, Lee CH, Taylor JA, Lin CG, Chen CY, et al. Xanthoma of the sacrum. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33:674-8.
  • 12 Jain A, Mathur K, Khatri S, Kasana S, Jain SK. Rare presentation of juvenile xanthogranuloma in the thoracic spine of an adult patient: Case report and literature review. Acta Neurochir 2011;153:1813-8.
  • 13 Agabegi SS, Iorio TE, Wilson JD, Fischgrund JS. Juvenile xanthogranuloma in an adult lumbar spine: A case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:69-73.
  • 14 McLoughlin E, Iqbal A, Clamp J, Davies M, James S, Botchu R, et al. Xanthoma of the thoracic spine: A case report and review of literature. Indian J Musculoskelet Radiol 2019;1:68-71.
  • 15 Rampini PM, Alimehmeti RH, Egidi MG, Zavanone ML, Bauer D, Fossali E, et al. Isolated cervical juvenile xanthogranuloma in childhood. Spine 2001;26:1392-5.
  • 16 Bhaisora K, Jaiswal A, Mehrotra A, Sahu RN, Srivastava A, Jaiswal S, et al. Solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma of the cervical spine in a child: A case report and review of literature. Asian J Neurosurg 2015;10:57.
  • 17 Bertoni F, Unni KK, McLeod RA, Sim FH. Xanthoma of Bone. Am J Clin Pathol 1988;90:377-84.
  • 18 Dallari D, Marinelli A, Pellacani A, Valeriani L, Lesi C, Bertoni F, et al. Xanthoma of bone: First sign of hyperlipidemia type IIB: A case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;274-7.
  • 19 Dehner LP. Juvenile xanthogranulomas in the first two decades of life: A clinicopathologic study of 174 cases with cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:579-93.
  • 20 Abdel Razek AA, Castillo M. Imaging appearance of primary bony tumors and pseudo-tumors of the spine. J Neuroradiol 2010;37:37-50.
  • 21 Kim YS, Han IH, Lee IS, Lee JS, Choi BK. Imaging findings of solitary spinal bony lesions and the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012;52:126-32.
  • 22 Alden KJ, McCarthy EF, Weber KL. Xanthoma of bone: A report of three cases and review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J 2008;28:58-64.
  • 23 Margins in Spine Tumor Resection: How Much Is Enough? Is Planned Transgression Okay? | Musculoskeletal Key, Available from: https://musculoskeletalkey.com/margins-in-spine-tumor-resection-how-much-is-enough-is-planned-transgression-okay/. [Last accessed on 2020 Nov 24].
  • 24 Boriani S, Bandiera S, Donthineni R, Amendola L, Cappuccio M, De Iure F, et al. Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine. Eur Spine J 2010;19:231-41.

Address for correspondence

Dr. Sundus Ali
Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital
Lahore
Pakistan   

Publication History

Received: 24 October 2020

Accepted: 28 December 2020

Article published online:
16 August 2022

© 2021. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

  • References

  • 1 Alhaneedi G, Salameh M, Abu Hejleh H. Xanthoma of bone: A mini review. Arch Surg Oncol 2018;4:130. [Doi: 10.4172/2471-2671.1000130].
  • 2 Cao D, Ma J, Yang X, Xiao J. Solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma in the upper cervical spine: Case report and review of the literatures. Eur Spine J 2008;17:S318-23.
  • 3 Lee SJ, Jo DJ, Lee SH, Kim SM. Solitary xanthogranuloma of the upper cervical spine in a male adult. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012;51:54-8.
  • 4 Purohit D, Chanduka AK, Sharma V, Mittal RS, Singhvi S. Juvenile xanthogranuloma of adult spine: A rare case and review of literature. Asian J Neurosurg 2014;9:239.
  • 5 Oyama H, Ikeda K, Inoue S, Katsumata T, Murakami S, Doi A. A case of intradural xanthogranuloma in the upper cervical spine. Neurol Surg 1997;25:745-8.
  • 6 Inoue H, Seichi A, Yamamuro K, Kojima M, Kimura A, Hoshino Y. Dumbbell-type juvenile xanthogranuloma in the cervical spine of an adult. Eur Spine J 2011;20:S343-7.
  • 7 Konar S, Pandey P, Yasha TC. Solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma in cervical spine: Case report and review of the literature. Turk Neurosurg 2014;24:102-7.
  • 8 Pirillo V, Prontera A, Rizzo P, Cecchi PC, Maffei M, Schwarz A. A rare case of intramedullary solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma of the lumbar spine in the adult: A case report. J Spine Surg 2017;3:504-8.
  • 9 Robertson DP, Langford LA, McCutcheon IE. Primary xanthoma of thoracic spine presenting with myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1933-7.
  • 10 Chung JY, Moon ES, Song EK, Yoon TR, Jung ST, Bae BS, et al. Primary xanthoma of the lumbosacral spine a case report. J Musculoskelet Res 1999;3:167-73.
  • 11 Huang GS, Huang CW, Lee CH, Taylor JA, Lin CG, Chen CY, et al. Xanthoma of the sacrum. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33:674-8.
  • 12 Jain A, Mathur K, Khatri S, Kasana S, Jain SK. Rare presentation of juvenile xanthogranuloma in the thoracic spine of an adult patient: Case report and literature review. Acta Neurochir 2011;153:1813-8.
  • 13 Agabegi SS, Iorio TE, Wilson JD, Fischgrund JS. Juvenile xanthogranuloma in an adult lumbar spine: A case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:69-73.
  • 14 McLoughlin E, Iqbal A, Clamp J, Davies M, James S, Botchu R, et al. Xanthoma of the thoracic spine: A case report and review of literature. Indian J Musculoskelet Radiol 2019;1:68-71.
  • 15 Rampini PM, Alimehmeti RH, Egidi MG, Zavanone ML, Bauer D, Fossali E, et al. Isolated cervical juvenile xanthogranuloma in childhood. Spine 2001;26:1392-5.
  • 16 Bhaisora K, Jaiswal A, Mehrotra A, Sahu RN, Srivastava A, Jaiswal S, et al. Solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma of the cervical spine in a child: A case report and review of literature. Asian J Neurosurg 2015;10:57.
  • 17 Bertoni F, Unni KK, McLeod RA, Sim FH. Xanthoma of Bone. Am J Clin Pathol 1988;90:377-84.
  • 18 Dallari D, Marinelli A, Pellacani A, Valeriani L, Lesi C, Bertoni F, et al. Xanthoma of bone: First sign of hyperlipidemia type IIB: A case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;274-7.
  • 19 Dehner LP. Juvenile xanthogranulomas in the first two decades of life: A clinicopathologic study of 174 cases with cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:579-93.
  • 20 Abdel Razek AA, Castillo M. Imaging appearance of primary bony tumors and pseudo-tumors of the spine. J Neuroradiol 2010;37:37-50.
  • 21 Kim YS, Han IH, Lee IS, Lee JS, Choi BK. Imaging findings of solitary spinal bony lesions and the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012;52:126-32.
  • 22 Alden KJ, McCarthy EF, Weber KL. Xanthoma of bone: A report of three cases and review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J 2008;28:58-64.
  • 23 Margins in Spine Tumor Resection: How Much Is Enough? Is Planned Transgression Okay? | Musculoskeletal Key, Available from: https://musculoskeletalkey.com/margins-in-spine-tumor-resection-how-much-is-enough-is-planned-transgression-okay/. [Last accessed on 2020 Nov 24].
  • 24 Boriani S, Bandiera S, Donthineni R, Amendola L, Cappuccio M, De Iure F, et al. Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine. Eur Spine J 2010;19:231-41.

Zoom Image
Figure 1: (a) Interpedicular and interspinous widening at C5, implementing large expansile lytic lesion replacing C5 vertebral body. Left C5 pedicle absent while right C5 pedicle displaced and thinned out. (b and c) Sagittal cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging showing soft-tissue mass isointense on T1 and T2, replacing C5 body, with T2 hyperintense cavity in the anterior part. (d) Axial section at C5 level, showing homogeneous enhancement of lesion, extension to the left pedicle, and thecal sac compression. Posterior elements are well spared
Zoom Image
Figure 2: (a) Biopsy specimen as yellow soft-to-firm mass removed piecemeal. (b) Histological findings (hematoxylin and eosin stain): Numerous foamy cells, cholesterol clefts, and multinucleated giant cells. (c) Immunohistochemical findings (streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method): Cells showed strong positivity for CD68
Zoom Image
Figure 3: (a) Postoperative X-ray cervical spine, anterior-posterior view. (b) Lateral view, due to very short neck, lower screws are not visible
Zoom Image
Table 1: Summary of the reported cases of intraosseous xanthoma in adult spine
Zoom Image
Table 2: Hallmark features differentiating from similar histological entities