Download PDF
Arthritis und Rheuma 2020; 40(05): 326-340
DOI: 10.1055/a-1202-9300
Schwerpunkt

Die Endoprothetik des Handgelenkes

Wann, wie und bei wem?Wrist arthroplastyRecommendations against reservations
Ingo Arnold∗
1   Klinik Orthopädie und operative Rheumatologie. Rotes Kreuz Krankenhaus, Bremen
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

In der Vergangenheit wurde der endoprothetische Ersatz des Handgelenkes nahezu ausschließlich bei älteren, „low-demand“ Patienten und bestehender rheumatoider Arthritis durchgeführt. Ein jüngeres Lebensalter, insbesondere im Zusammenhang mit einer posttraumatischen Arthrose gilt z. T. immer noch als Kontraindikation. Dieses Dogma hat sich inzwischen mit den guten mittelfristigen Erfahrungen im Umgang mit der 4. Prothesengeneration deutlich geändert. Für die derzeit verfügbaren Implantate werden Standzeiten von 86 % nach 10 Jahren (Motec) [1], 78 % über 15 Jahre (Universal 2) [2], oder 94 % für 8 Jahre (ReMotion) berichtet [3]. Hierbei ließen sich auch für die vermeintlich schwierigere Klientel der Jüngeren ein zuverlässiger Erhalt eines für die täglichen Dinge ausreichenden Bewegungsumfanges, eine zuverlässige Schmerzbefreiung und ein Zugewinn für die Griffstärke darstellen. Alternativ garantiert auch die Arthrodese des Handgelenkes keineswegs immer eine hohe Patientenzufriedenheit und niedrige Komplikationsrate. Dennoch reichen die bisherigen Publikationen, insbesondere aufgrund ihrer geringen Fallstärke, weiterhin nicht aus, um den künstlichen Handgelenkersatz über die Anwendung in wenigen Spezialzentren hinaus generell empfehlen zu können. Weiterhin lässt sich nicht beantworten, warum diesbezüglich die OP-Frequenz im Widerspruch zu den deutlich verbesserten Ergebnissen eher wieder abzunehmen scheint [4].

ABSTRACT

In the past, the endoprosthetic replacement of the wrist was performed almost exclusively in older, low-demand patients and existing rheumatoid arthritis. A younger age and thus post-traumatic arthrosis (PTOA) applies e. g. still as a contraindication. This dogma has meanwhile changed significantly with the good medium-term experience in dealing with the 4th generation of prostheses. For the currently available implants, survival rates of 86 % after 10 years (Motec), 78 % over 15 years (Universal 2) or 94 % for 8 years (ReMotion) are reported. In this way, even for the supposedly more difficult clientele of the younger generation, reliable preservation of a range of motion sufficient for everyday things, reliable pain relief and an increase in grip strength could be represented. Alternatively, wrist arthrodesis does not always guarantee high patient satisfaction and a low complication rate. Nevertheless, the previous publications, especially due to their low drop size, are still insufficient to generally recommend artificial wrist replacement beyond use in a few special centers. Furthermore, there is no answer as to why the op frequency has dropped discordantly with the good results.

Schlüsselwörter

Arthrodese Handgelenk - rheumatoide Arthritis - Handgelenkarthrose - Totalendoprothese Hand - ReMotion® - Freedom® - Motec®

Keywords

Wrist arthroplasty - total wrist fusion - rheumatoid arthritis - wrist arthritis - ReMotion - Freedom - Motec


Publication History

Article published online:
02 November 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Reigstad O, Holm-Glad T, Bolstad B. et al Five- to 10-Year Prospective Follow-Up of Wrist Arthroplasty in 56 Nonrheumatoid Patients. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (10) 788-796 doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.097
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gil JA, Kamal RN, Cone E. et al High Survivorship and Few Complications With Cementless Total Wrist Arthroplasty at a Mean Followup of 9 Years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (12) 3082-3087 doi:10.1007/s11999-017-5445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Boeckstyns ME, Herzberg G, Merser S. Favorable results after total wrist arthroplasty: 65 wrists in 60 patients followed for 5–9 years. Acta Orthop 2013; 84 (04) 415-419 doi:10.3109/17453674.2013.823588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 REPORT June 2019, Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Arthroplasty and Hip Fractures Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Register, Helse Bergen HF, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, ISBN: 978–82–91847–24–5 http://nrlweb.ihelse.ne
  • 5 Bergstra SA, Chopra A, Saluja M. et al Evaluation of the joint distribution at disease presentation of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a large study across continents. RMD Open 2017; 3 (02) e000568 doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2017
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Diller M, Tarner IH. Pharmakotherapie des älteren, multimorbiden Patienten in der Rheumatologie. Arzneimitteltherapie 2020; 38: 125-136
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Musculoskeletal Health in Europe. Report v5.0. Im Internet: http://www.eumusc.net/workpackages_wp4.cfm Stand: 28.07.2015.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Rikli DA, Honigmann P, Babst R. et al Intra-articular pressure measurement in the radioulnocarpal joint using a novel sensor: in vitro and in vivo results. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (01) 67-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Palmer AK, Werner FW, Murphy D. et al Functional wrist motion: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am 1985; 10 (01) 39e46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Laulan J, Martea E, Bacle G. Wrist osteoarthritis. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2015; 101: S1-S9 doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.0251877-0568
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bala SV, Samuelson K, Hagell P. et al Living with persistent rheumatoid arthritis: a BARFOT study. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26 17–18 2646-2656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sauerbier M, Kluge S, Bickert B. et al Subjective and objective outcomes after total wrist arthrodesis in patients with radiocarpal arthrosis or Kienböck’s disease. Chir Main 2000; 19 (04) 223-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Reigstad O, Holm-Glad T, Korslund J. et al High re-operation and complication rates 11 years after arthrodesis of the wrist for non-inflammatory arthritis. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B (07) 852-859 doi:10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-0943
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 De Smet L, Truyen J. Arthrodesis of the wrist for osteoarthritis: outcome with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. J Hand Surg Br 2003; 28: 575-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Melamed E, Marascalchi B, Hinds RM. et al Trends in the Utilization of Total Wrist Arthroplasty versus Wrist Fusion for Treatment of Advanced Wrist Arthritis. J Wrist Surg 2016; 5 (03) 211-216 doi:10.1055/s-0036-1571841
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Field J, Herbert TJ, Prosser R. Total wrist fusion. A functional assessment. J Hand Surg Br 1996; 21: 429-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nydick JA, Watt JF, Garcia MJ. et al Clinical outcomes of arthrodesis and arthroplasty for the treatment of posttraumatic wrist arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (05) 899-903 doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.013
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Vicar AJ, Burton RI. Surgical management of the rheumatoid wrist – fusion or arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 1986; 11 (06) 790-797
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Murphy DM, Khoury JG, Imbriglia JE. et al Comparison of arthroplasty and arthrodesis for the rheumatoid wrist. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28 (04) 570-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Elbulu AM, Milone MT, Capo JT. et al Trends and Demographics in the Utilization of Total Wrist Arthroplasty. The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume) 2018; 23 (04) 501-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nystad TW, Fenstad AM, Furnes O. et al Reduction in orthopaedic surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a Norwegian register-based study, Scandinavian. Journal of Rheumatology 2016; 45 (01) 1-7 doi:10.3109/03009742.2015.1050451
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Gogna R, Cheung G, Arundell M. et al Rheumatoid hand surgery: is there a decline? A 22-year population-based study. Hand 2015; 10: 272-278 doi:10.1007/s11552-014-9708-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Arnold I. Total wrist arthroplasty – a promising prospect. OUP 2017; 10: 494-503 doi:10.3238/oup.2017.0494-0503
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Wolfe SW, Packer G, Tan D. et al Midcarpal Hemiarthroplasty for Wrist Arthritis: Rationale and Early Result Wrist Surg. 2012; 1: 61-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Botero SS, Yuka I, Facca S. et al Surgical technique. About a new total and isoelastic wrist implant (Prosthelast®). Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2018; 28 (08) 1525-1530 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2271-2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mallory TH. Preparation of the proximal femur in cementless total hip revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 235: 47-60
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Yeoh D, Tourret L. Total wrist arthroplasty: a systematic review of the evidence from the last 5 years. Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40 (05) 458-468 doi:10.1177/1753193414539796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Takwale VJ, Nuttall D, Trail IA. et al Biaxial Total Wrist Replacement in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clinical Review, Survivorship and Radiological Analysis J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (05) 692-699 doi:10.1302/0301-620x.84b5.12276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Eckhoff MD, Bader JM, Nesti LJ. et al Acute Complications in Total Wrist Arthroplasty: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Review. J Wrist Surg 2020; 9 (02) 124-128 doi:10.1055/s-0039-3400465
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Sagerfors M, Gupta A, Brus O. et al Total Wrist Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Study of 219 Cases With 5-Year Follow-up. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (12) 2380-2387 doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.09.0161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Reigstad O, Holm-Glad T, Bolstad B. et al Five- to 10-Year Prospective Follow-Up of Wrist Arthroplasty in 56 Nonrheumatoid Patients. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (10) 788e796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Zijlker HJA, Ritt PF, Jsselstein I. Long-Term Results of Universal 2 Total Wrist Arthroplasty. J Wrist Surg 2019; 8 (04) 317-320 doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0039-1685469
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Brinkhorst ME, Selles RW, Dias J. et al Results of the Universal 2 Prosthesis in noninflammatory Osteoarthritic Wrists. J Wrist Surg 2017 DOI: doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0037-1606258
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Herzberg G. Prospective study of a new total wrist arthroplasty: short term results. Chir Main 2011; 30 (01) 20-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Boeckstyns ME, Herzberg G, Merser S. Favorable results after total wrist arthroplasty: 65 wrists in 60 patients followed for 5–9 years. Acta Orthop 2013; 84 (04) 415-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Nydick JA, Greenberg SM, Stone JD. et al Clinical outcomes of totalwrist arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (08) 1580-1584
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Honecker S, Igeta Y, Al Hefzi A. et al Survival Rate on a 10-Year Follow-Up of Total Wrist Replacement Implants: A 23-Patient Case Series. J Wrist Surg 2018 DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668152
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Nicoloff M. Handgelenksprothetik – Indikation und aktueller Stand. Z Orthop Unfall 2015; 153: 38-45
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Froschauer SM, Zaussinger M, Hager D. et al Re-motion total wrist arthroplasty: 39 non-rheumatoid cases with a mean follow-up of 7 years. Journal of Hand Surgery 2019 (European Volume); 0 (0) 1-5 DOI: doi:10.1177/1753193419866117
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Schmidt I. RE-MOTION total wrist arthroplasty for treatment of advanced stage of scaphoid non-union advanced collapse. Does excision of the entire scaphoid bone prevent impingement at terminal range of radial deviation?. Trauma Emerg Care 2017; 2 (02) 1-4 doi:10.15761/TEC.1000127
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Fischer P, Sagerfors M, Jakobsson H. et al Total Wrist Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Follow-Up. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45 (08) 780.e1-780e10 doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.02.006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Herzberg G, Boeckstyns M, Sorensen AI. et al „Remotion” total wrist arthroplasty: preliminary results of a prospective international multicenter study of 215 cases. J Wrist Surg 2012; 1 (01) 17-22 doi:10.1055/s-0032-1323642
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Menon J. Universal Total Wrist Implant: experience with a carpal component fixed with three screws. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 515-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Meuli HC. Total wrist arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 187: 107-111 PMID: 6744703
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Youm Y, McMurthy RY, Flatt AE. et al An experimental study of radial-ulnar deviation and flexion-extension. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60 (04) 423-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Karjalainen T, Pamilo K, Reito A. Implant Failure After Motec Wrist Joint Prosthesis Due to Failure of Ball and Socket-Type Articulation-Two Patients With Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris and Polyether Ether Ketone. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43 (11) 1044.e1-1044.e4 doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.03.010
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Giwa L, Siddiqui A, Packer G. Motec Wrist Arthroplasty: 4 Years of Promising Results. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol 2018; 23 (03) 364-368 doi:10.1142/S2424835518500388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Cobb TK, Beckenbaugh RD. Biaxial total-wrist arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21: 1011-1021
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Kretschmer F, Fansa H. Die Biax Handgelenkprothese: Management und Erfahrungen bei 42 Patienten. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2007; 39 (04) 238-248 doi: 10.1055/s-2007-964878
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Arnold I. Update Endoprothetik des Handgelenkes. Akt Rheumatol 2014; 39: 1-5 doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1383588
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Damert H-G. Handgelenkendoprothetik – ein Erfahrungsbericht. Orthopäde 2019; 48: 402-412 doi.org/10.1007/s00132-019-03725-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Sugiura Y, Iwamoto T, Suzuki T. et al Computed tomography-based three-dimensional preoperative planning for total wrist arthroplasty. J Modern Rheumatology Case Reports 2020; 4: 208-211 doi.org/10.1080/24725625.2020.1741115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Boeckstyns MEH. My personal experience with arthroplasties in the hand and wrist over the past four decades. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2019; 44 (02) 129-137 doi:10.1177/1753193418817172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Petscavage-Thomas JM, Gustas-French C, Walker EA. Radiologic Update on Arthroplasties in the Wrist and Hand. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2019; 23 (02) 151-161 doi:10.1055/s-0038-1677464
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Yeoh D, Tourret L. Total wrist arthroplasty: a systematic review of the evidence from the last 5 years. Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40 (05) 458-468 doi:10.1177/1753193414539796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Gaspar MP, Kane PM, Shin EK. Arthroplasty and Wrist Fusion. Hand Clin 2015; 31: 277-292 doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2015.01.004
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Gaspar MP, Lou J, Kane PM. et al Complications Following Partial and Total Wrist Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Retrospective Review. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (01) 47-53.e4 doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.10.021
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Berber O, Garagnani L, Gidwani S. Systematic Review of Total Wrist Arthroplasty and Arthrodesis in Wrist Arthritis. Journal of Wrist Surger 2017; 20 doi:10.1055/s-0038-1646956
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Arnold I. Die operative Korrektur rheumatischer Handgelenkdeformitäten – Tipps und Tricks, Surgery for Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Wrist – A Special Focus on New Treatment Options. Akt Rheumatol 2016; 41 (06) 462-470 doi:10.1055/s-0042-114977
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar