Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28(01): 039-044
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368167
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Robot-Assisted Surgery of the Shoulder Girdle and Brachial Plexus

Sybille Facca
1   Department of Hand Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Illkirch, France
,
Sarah Hendriks
1   Department of Hand Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Illkirch, France
,
Gustavo Mantovani
2   Department of Hand Surgery, Sao Paolo Hand center, Ben Portuguesa Hospital, Sao Paolo, Brazil
,
Jesse C. Selber
3   Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
,
Philippe Liverneaux
1   Department of Hand Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Illkirch, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 March 2014 (online)

Abstract

New developments in the surgery of the brachial plexus include the use of less invasive surgical approaches and more precise techniques. The theoretical advantages of the use of robotics versus endoscopy are the disappearance of physiological tremor, three-dimensional vision, high definition, magnification, and superior ergonomics.

On a fresh cadaver, a dissection space was created and maintained by insufflation of CO2. The supraclavicular brachial plexus was dissected using the da Vinci robot (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). A segment of the C5 nerve root was grafted robotically. A series of eight clinical cases of nerve damage around the shoulder girdle were operated on using the da Vinci robot. The ability to perform successful microneural repair was confirmed in both the authors' clinical and experimental studies, but the entire potential of robotically assisted microneural surgery was not realized during these initial cases because an open incision was still required.

Robotic-assisted surgery of the shoulder girdle and brachial plexus is still in its early stages. It would be ideal to have even finer and more suitable instruments to apply fibrin glue or electrostimulation in nerve surgery. Nevertheless, the prospects of minimally invasive techniques would allow acute and subacute surgical approach of traumatic brachial plexus palsy safely, without significant and cicatricial morbidity.

 
  • References

  • 1 Burman MS. Arthroscopy or the direct visualization of joints: an experimental cadaver study. 1931. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 390 (390) 5-9
  • 2 Watanabe M. Atlas of Arthroscopy. 2nd ed. Tokyo, Japan: Igakui-Shoin; 1969
  • 3 Neviaser A, Braman J, Parsons B. What's new in shoulder and elbow surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95: 1896-1901
  • 4 Johnson LL. Arthroscopy of the shoulder. Orthop Clin North Am 1980; 11 (2) 197-204
  • 5 Poehling GG, Whipple TL, Sisco L, Goldman B. Elbow arthroscopy: a new technique. Arthroscopy 1989; 5 (3) 222-224
  • 6 Fontes D. [Historical developments of upper limp arthroscopy]. Chir Main 2006; 25(Suppl 1): S4-S7 [in French]
  • 7 Rockwood Jr CA. Shoulder arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70 (5) 639-640
  • 8 Boileau P, Old J, Gastaud O, Brassart N, Roussanne Y. All-arthroscopic Weaver-Dunn-Chuinard procedure with double-button fixation for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (2) 149-160
  • 9 Lafosse L, Baier GP, Leuzinger J. Arthroscopic treatment of acute and chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (8) 1017
  • 10 Nourissat G, Kakuda C, Dumontier C, Sautet A, Doursounian L. Arthroscopic stabilization of Neer type 2 fracture of the distal part of the clavicle. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (6) e1-e4
  • 11 Pujol N, Philippeau JM, Richou J, Lespagnol F, Graveleau N, Hardy P. Arthroscopic treatment of distal clavicle fractures: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (9) 884-886
  • 12 Tavakkolizadeh A, Hales PF, Janes GC. Arthroscopic excision of sternoclavicular joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (4) 405-408
  • 13 Clavert P. Arthroscopie of the scapulo-thoracic joint. In: Allieu Y, , ed. The Shoulder Girdle—Actualités Thérapeutiques. Montpellier, France: Sauramps; 2010: 53-58 . [in French]
  • 14 Barber FA. Percutaneous arthroscopic release of the suprascapular nerve. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (2) e1-e4
  • 15 Ghodadra N, Nho SJ, Verma NN , et al. Arthroscopic decompression of the suprascapular nerve at the spinoglenoid notch and suprascapular notch through the subacromial space. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (4) 439-445
  • 16 Lafosse L, Tomasi A, Corbett S, Baier G, Willems K, Gobezie R. Arthroscopic release of suprascapular nerve entrapment at the suprascapular notch: technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (1) 34-42
  • 17 Garcia Jr JC, Mantovani G, Liverneaux PA. Brachial plexus endoscopy: feasibility study on cadavers. Chir Main 2012; 31 (1) 7-12
  • 18 Pan WJ, Teo YS, Chang HC, Chong KC, Karim SA. The relationship of the lateral cord of the brachial plexus to the coracoid process during arthroscopic coracoid surgery: a dynamic cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (10) 1998-2001
  • 19 Xu WD, Lu JZ, Qiu YQ , et al. Hand prehension recovery after brachial plexus avulsion injury by performing a full-length phrenic nerve transfer via endoscopic thoracic surgery. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (6) 1215-1219
  • 20 Liverneaux P, Nectoux E, Taleb C. The future of robotics in hand surgery. Chir Main 2009; 28 (5) 278-285
  • 21 Taleb C, Nectoux E, Liverneaux PA. Telemicrosurgery: a feasibility study in a rat model. Chir Main 2008; 27 (2-3) 104-108
  • 22 Nectoux E, Taleb C, Liverneaux P. Nerve repair in telemicrosurgery: an experimental study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25 (4) 261-265
  • 23 Panchulidze I, Berner S, Mantovani G, Liverneaux P. Is haptic feedback necessary to microsurgical suturing? Comparative study of 9/0 and 10/0 knot tying operated by 24 surgeons. Hand Surg 2011; 16 (1) 1-3
  • 24 Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (6) 1305-1312
  • 25 Germain M, Liverneaux P, Missana MC. Microsurgery with the Da Vinci robot S. The telemicrosurgery: the imminent rise. E-mémoires de l'Académie Nationale de Chirurgie, Paris 2010; 9: 74-77 [in French]